Goldman and Goldman
Case
•
[2007] FamCA 578
•13 June 2007
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Goldman and Goldman [2007] FamCA 578
[2007] FamCA 578
13 June 2007
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Full Court of the Family Court of Australia, comprising Kay, Coleman and Cronin JJ, considered an application by the husband for leave to appeal orders made by Barry J on 12 February 2007. The specific nature of the dispute between the parties, Mr and Mrs Goldman, and the subject matter of Barry J's orders are not detailed in the provided text.
The primary legal issue before the Full Court was whether the husband should be granted leave to appeal the earlier orders. This required the Court to assess the merits of the proposed appeal and determine if there were sufficient grounds to permit it to proceed.
The Court granted the husband leave to appeal the orders of Barry J. The costs associated with this application for leave to appeal were ordered to be costs in the substantive appeal.
The primary legal issue before the Full Court was whether the husband should be granted leave to appeal the earlier orders. This required the Court to assess the merits of the proposed appeal and determine if there were sufficient grounds to permit it to proceed.
The Court granted the husband leave to appeal the orders of Barry J. The costs associated with this application for leave to appeal were ordered to be costs in the substantive appeal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Goldman and Goldman [2007] FamCA 578
Most Recent Citation
Rinsky and Rinsky [2008] FamCA 427
Cases Cited
13
Statutory Material Cited
1
Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc
[1981] HCA 39
Rogers, Alan v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority
[1996] FCA 750
Minister for Army v Parbury Henty & Co Pty Ltd
[1945] HCA 52