Golding Contractors Pty Ltd

Case [2019] FWCA 7504


[2019] FWCA 7504
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Golding Contractors Pty Ltd
(AG2019/3133)

GOLDING CONTRACTORS PTY LTD KOGAN CREEK AGREEMENT 2019

Coal industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT BULL

SYDNEY, 31 OCTOBER 2019

Application for approval of the Golding Contractors Pty Ltd Kogan Creek Agreement 2019.

[1] An application has been filed by Golding Contractors Pty Ltd(the applicant) for the approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Golding Contractors Pty Ltd Kogan Creek Agreement 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement as per s.172(2) of the Act.

[2] The applicant provided undertakings regarding rostering of Trainees and rates of pay for employees where a roster change occurs.

[3] The undertakings are attached at the end of the Agreement. I am satisfied pursuant to s.190(3) of the Act that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial change to the Agreement. Pursuant to s.201(3) of the Act, I note that the undertakings are taken to be terms of the Agreement.

[4] Subject to the undertaking referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[5] The Agreement’s consultation term was not in accordance with s.205(1) of the Act. Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the model consultation term is attached at the end of the Agreement.

[6] The Agreement’s individual flexibility term was not in accordance with s.203(2) of the Act. Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the model flexibility term is attached at the end of the Agreement.

[7] The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the CFMMEU. The views of the CFMMEU, and the employee bargaining representatives, were sought regarding the undertakings provided by the employer in accordance with s.190(4) of the Act.

[8] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days from the date of approval. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 4 years from the date of approval.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE505941  PR713870>

Details
AGLC
Golding Contractors Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 7504
Case
[2019] FWCA 7504
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Golding Contractors Pty Ltd involved an application by Golding Contractors for approval of the Kogan Creek Agreement 2019. The application was brought before the Fair Work Commission (FWC) in Australia, which oversees the implementation and approval of enterprise agreements under the Fair Work Act 2009. The dispute centred around whether the agreement met the legal requirements for approval, specifically whether it contained the necessary terms and was free from any contravention of the Act.

The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement complied with the formal requirements for approval and whether it contained all the mandatory terms required by the Act. The Commission had to consider whether the agreement provided for wages and other conditions of employment, and if it ensured that employees were not disadvantaged compared to their previous conditions. Additionally, the Commission assessed whether the agreement was free from any unfair content and if it was made in good faith.

In delivering its decision, the Commission examined the provisions of the agreement and found that it satisfied all the necessary formal requirements. The agreement included all mandatory terms and provided for the wages and conditions of employment, ensuring that employees were not worse off. The Commission also determined that the agreement was free from any unfair content and was made in good faith. Based on these findings, the Commission approved the agreement.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Kogan Creek Agreement 2019, confirming its compliance with the Fair Work Act. This decision ensures that the terms of the agreement are legally sound and that the rights and conditions of the employees are adequately protected.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.