| [2015] FWCA 7421 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Goldclass Corporation Pty Ltd as trustee for the Chris Litas Family Trust & Runwild Enterprises Pty Ltd as trustee for the Mainstone Family Trust
(AG2015/6409)
LITAS MAINSTONE MINIMUM RATES AGREEMENT 2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | SYDNEY, 29 OCTOBER 2015 |
Application for approval of the Litas Mainstone Minimum Rates Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Litas Mainstone Minimum Rates Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Goldclass Corporation Pty Ltd as trustee for the Chris Litas Family Trust & Runwild Enterprises Pty Ltd as trustee for the Mainstone Family Trust. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 29 October 2015 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 5 November 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 29 October 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE416391 PR573371>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Goldclass Corporation Pty Ltd as trustee for the Chris Litas Family Trust & Runwild Enterprises Pty Ltd as trustee for the Mainstone Family Trust [2015] FWCA 7421
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 7421
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Court considered the nature of the agreement, the interests of the parties, and the commercial considerations involved. It found that the agreement was fair and reasonable and in the best interests of the parties. The Court also found that the agreement was consistent with the terms of the joint venture and that it was a necessary and appropriate means of ensuring that the parties could effectively manage their joint venture.
The Court approved the Litas Mainstone Minimum Rates Agreement 2015, subject to certain conditions. These conditions included the requirement that the parties provide notice to each other of any proposed changes to the agreement and that they provide certain documentation to the Court. The Court also ordered that the agreement be registered with the relevant authorities. The Court's decision provides clarity and certainty to the parties in relation to the minimum rates that are payable under the joint venture.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.