Goda & Karnik

Case [2024] FedCFamC2F 604


FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

(DIVISION 2)

Goda & Karnik [2024] FedCFamC2F 604   

File number(s): PAC 2901 of 2021
Judgment of: JUDGE OBRADOVIC
Date of judgment: 16 May 2024
Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – PARENTING – Finding of family violence – Whether mother’s parenting impacted by father spending time – Presumption of equal shared parental responsibility rebutted – Whether the child spends time with the father and whether such time be supervised – Injunctions ordered – The child’s time with the father suspended in certain circumstances  
Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 60CC, 60CA, 61DA, 68B
Cases cited:

Banks & Banks [2015] FamCAFC 36

Blinko & Blinko [2015] FamCAFC 146

Isles v Nelissen [2022] FedCFamC1A 97

Johnson & Page [2007] FamCA 1235

M & M (1989) 166 CLR 69

Mazorski & Albright [2007] FamCA 520

McCall & Clark [2009] FamCAFC 92

MRR v GR [2010] HCA 4

Slater & Light [2011] FamCAFC 1

Division: Division 2 Family Law
Number of paragraphs: 165
Date of hearing: 6-9 November 2023, 22 February 2024
Place: Parramatta
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Moutasallem
Solicitor for the Applicant: Avondale Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Hegedus
Solicitor for the Respondent: Circle Bridge Legal
Counsel for the Independent Children's Lawyer: Ms Yu
Solicitor for the Independent Children's Lawyer: Harb Lawyers

ORDERS

PAC 2901 of 2021

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 2)

BETWEEN:

MR GODA

Applicant

AND:

MS KARNIK

Respondent

INDEPENDENT CHILDREN'S LAWYER

ORDER MADE BY:

JUDGE OBRADOVIC

DATE OF ORDER:

16 MAY 2024

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The Respondent (“mother”) shall have sole parental responsibility for the child X, born in 2019 (“child”).

2.The child shall live with the mother.

3.Subject to orders 6 and 7 below, the child is to spend time with the Applicant (“father”) as follows:

(a)For a period of 12 months from the date of these orders:

(i)Supervised by B Contact Service or another professional supervision service as agreed between the parents in writing; and

(ii)For 2 hours each month on a date and time as agreed between the parents and the supervising service.

(b)Thereafter:

(i)In the presence of the paternal grandmother Ms C or either of the paternal aunts, Ms D or Ms E; and

(ii)For 4 hours on the first Sunday of each month at times as agreed between the parents in writing, and failing agreement, from 12noon to 4pm.

4.For the purposes of order 3(a):

(a)The father is to bear the costs of supervision; and

(b)Each parent must:

(i)Contact the supervision service within seven (7) days of these orders to arrange an appointment for assessment for suitability;

(ii)Attend the assessment;

(iii)Comply with any appointment made by the service;

(iv)Comply with all reasonable rules of the service; and

(v)Comply with all reasonable requests or directions of the staff of the service.

5.For the purposes of order 3(b) changeover shall occur at a place nominated by the mother, with such nomination to occur no later than 24 hours before time is to occur.

6.Pursuant to s.68B…

Continue reading Goda & Karnik

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Goda & Karnik [2024] FedCFamC2F 604
Case
[2024] FedCFamC2F 604
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Goda v Karnik, the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) considered a parenting dispute between the parties. The central issues involved the allocation of parental responsibility and the conditions under which the child could spend time with the father. The court was tasked with determining whether the mother's parenting was adversely affected by the father spending time with the child, and if the presumption of equal shared parental responsibility should be rebutted. Additionally, the court had to decide on the appropriate conditions for the child's time with the father, including the necessity for supervision and the imposition of injunctions.

The court found that family violence had occurred, which influenced the mother's capacity to parent effectively. Consequently, the presumption of equal shared parental responsibility was rebutted, and the mother was granted sole parental responsibility for the child. The court ordered that the child would spend time with the father under specific conditions, including supervised visits for the first 12 months and thereafter, in the presence of specified family members. The father was also required to bear the costs of supervision and comply with various conditions to ensure the safety and well-being of the child. Furthermore, the court issued several injunctions to protect the mother and the child from the father's potentially harmful actions and communications.

In its judgment, the court highlighted the importance of ensuring the child's safety and stability, given the history of family violence. The orders reflect a balanced approach, aiming to facilitate the father's involvement in the child's life while mitigating risks associated with his past conduct. The court's decision includes provisions for the immediate and permanent suspension of the father's parenting time if he is found guilty of certain offences or breaches related to family violence or protection orders.

The final orders grant sole parental responsibility to the mother, outline specific conditions for the father's time with the child, impose various restrictions and requirements on the father, and provide mechanisms for the suspension or staying of parenting time in certain circumstances.

Orders

Orders of the court

PAC 2901 of 2021

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 2)

BETWEEN:

MR GODA

Applicant

AND:

MS KARNIK

Respondent

INDEPENDENT CHILDREN'S LAWYER

ORDER MADE BY:

JUDGE OBRADOVIC

DATE OF ORDER:

16 MAY 2024

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. The Respondent (“mother”) shall have sole parental responsibility for the child X, born in 2019 (“child”).

2. The child shall live with the mother.

3. Subject to orders 6 and 7 below, the child is to spend time with the Applicant (“father”) as follows:

(a) For a period of 12 months from the date of these orders:

(i) Supervised by B Contact Service or another professional supervision service as agreed between the parents in writing; and

(ii) For 2 hours each month on a date and time as agreed between the parents and the supervising service.

(b) Thereafter:

(i) In the presence of the paternal grandmother Ms C or either of the paternal aunts, Ms D or Ms E; and

(ii) For 4 hours on the first Sunday of each month at times as agreed between the parents in writing, and failing agreement, from 12noon to 4pm.

4. For the purposes of order 3(a):

(a) The father is to bear the costs of supervision; and

(b) Each parent must:

(i) Contact the supervision service within seven (7) days of these orders to arrange an appointment for assessment for suitability;

(ii) Attend the assessment;

(iii) Comply with any appointment made by the service;

(iv) Comply with all reasonable rules of the service; and

(v) Comply with all reasonable requests or directions of the staff of the service.

5. For the purposes of order 3(b) changeover shall occur at a place nominated by the mother, with such nomination to occur no later than 24 hours before time is to occur.

6. Pursuant to s.68B of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) the father is restrained by injunction from:

(a) Approaching or contacting the mother or the child, or causing any third party to do so, unless in accordance with these Orders;

(b) Attending, entering or remaining within 50 metres of any school attended by the child, or causing any third party to do so;

(c) Attending, entering or remaining within 50 metres of the mother’s home or workplace, or causing any third party to do so;

(d) Consuming illicit substances within 24 hours of the child spending time with him;

(e) Using physical discipline on the child, or causing, permitting or allowing any third party to do so;

(f) Discussing these proceedings with the child, or causing, permitting or allowing any third party to do so;

(g) Showing the child any documents pertaining to these proceedings or causing, permitting, or allowing any third party to do so; and

(h) Denigrating the mother or her family in the presence or hearing of the child, or causing, permitting, or allowing any third party to do so.

7. Orders 3 and 4 above are immediately and permanently stayed if the father is found guilty of:

(a) Any offence of violence and/or any offence of stalking or intimidation against the mother and/or child; and/or

(b) Any breach of apprehended domestic violence order or any order for the protection of the mother and/or child.

8. Orders 3 and 4 above are immediately suspended if the father is:

(a) Alleged to have contravened any of the injunctions in order 6 above, such that an application alleging such contravention is filed and proceedings are commenced;

(b) Charged with any breach of an apprehended domestic violence order or of any order for the protection of the mother and/or child; and/or

(c) Charged with any offence of violence and/or any offence of stalking or intimidation against the mother and/or child,

pending the outcome of those charges and any proceedings.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).

Part XIVB of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish an account of proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.