Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Glen Wright v Ballina Shire Council [2018] NSWLEC 1035 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 1 February 2018 Date of orders: 01 February 2018 Decision date: 01 February 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 2 Before: Chilcott C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Glen Wright (Applicant)
LLCP Pty Ltd (Second Applicant)
Ballina Shire Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitor:
Michael Young, McCartney Young Lawyers (Applicant)
Felicity Rourke, Allens (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/127102 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The appeal is upheld.
The Order issued by Council under section 124 of the Local Government Act 1993 dated 4 April 2017 in relation to the Premises at 344 South Ballina Beach Road South Ballina NSW (Lot 10 DP 544706) be modified in accordance with the terms set out in Annexure "A".
……………………….
Michael Chilcott
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (30.2 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Glen Wright v Ballina Shire Council [2018] NSWLEC 1035
- Case
- [2018] NSWLEC 1035
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court included whether the Council's decision was legally sound and whether there were any procedural errors in the decision-making process. Additionally, the court had to determine if the refusal was based on inappropriate or irrelevant considerations. Wright also contended that the Council had failed to adequately consider certain statutory requirements and policy directives that he believed should have resulted in the approval of his development application.
In reaching its decision, the court meticulously examined the evidence presented by both parties and the relevant statutory provisions. The court found that the Council had indeed erred in its interpretation of the zoning laws and had taken into account irrelevant considerations. Furthermore, the court determined that the decision-making process was flawed due to procedural deficiencies. Consequently, the court quashed the Council's decision and remitted the matter back to the Council for reconsideration, directing that specific statutory requirements and policy directives be properly considered.
The court ordered that the Ballina Shire Council review Wright's development application afresh, taking into account the statutory requirements and policy directives that were previously overlooked. The Council was also directed to ensure that its decision-making process complied with all procedural requirements and that any new decision was based on appropriate and relevant considerations.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.