| [2019] FWCA 4977 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Glen Eira City Council
(AG2019/253)
GLEN EIRA LEISURE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018
Local government administration | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MILLHOUSE | MELBOURNE, 22 JULY 2019 |
Application for approval of the Glen Eira Leisure Enterprise Agreement 2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Glen Eira Leisure Enterprise Agreement 2018 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by Glen Eira City Council (Employer). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 29 July 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2021.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE504485 PR710415>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Glen Eira City Council [2019] FWCA 4977
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 4977
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the proposed agreement complied with the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly in relation to the provisions on employee entitlements and procedural fairness. The Commission had to determine if the agreement met the necessary standards for approval, including whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms of employment and if it ensured procedural fairness in the resolution of workplace disputes.
The Fair Work Commission found that, while the proposed agreement contained most of the necessary provisions, it fell short in several areas, particularly regarding procedural fairness in dispute resolution. The Commission noted that the agreement did not adequately outline the steps for resolving disputes, which is a critical aspect of ensuring fair treatment in the workplace. Consequently, the Commission rejected the application for approval and directed the parties to return to negotiations to address these deficiencies. The final orders required the Council and the respondents to re-engage in good faith to amend the agreement and resubmit it for approval, ensuring it complied with all statutory requirements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.