| [2022] FWCA 2102 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Glen Eden Constructions Pty Ltd
(AG2022/1208)
Glen Eden Constructions Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2022 – 2026
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| COMMISSIONER SIMPSON | BRISBANE, 27 JUNE 2022 |
Application for approval of the Glen Eden Constructions Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2022 - 2026
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Glen Eden Constructions Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2022 – 2026 (the Agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Glen Eden Constructions Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
On 27 April 2022 the matter was allocated to me, and I sent correspondence to the Applicant on 29 April 2022 setting out some concerns that were identified with the Agreement.
On 3 May 2022 the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU) wrote to the Commission seeking to be heard and requesting the documents submitted in the matter. Later that day, these were sent to the CFMMEU.
I listed the matter for a Directions Hearing on 10 May 2022 where I granted leave for the CFMMEU to be heard and set directions for the filing of material. Both parties filed in accordance with those directions. After both parties had filed material, email correspondence was sent from my chambers to the parties which asked both parties to advise whether they were content for the Commission to determine the matter on the material filed, or alternatively, if they wished to cross examine witnesses for the other party. Both parties indicated they were content for the Commission to proceed to determine the matter on the papers.
Submissions
The CFMMEU submitted that in the days after the vote process had taken place CFMMEU Official, Dean Mattas, was contacted by members who work for the Applicant with concerns about the process undertaken and the lack of representation. After seeking advice from Mr Dunbar, Mr Mattas asked the members to put their concerns in writing. They agreed on the condition their names be kept anonymous.
The CFMMEU raised the following issues:
· Letters received from members asserted they had never received the Notice of right to be represented; and
· The company had not correctly notified the relevant employees of the start of the access period as required.
Notification of the vote
The CFMMEU submitted that the Applicant has since put forward an explanation for the second issue as it had also been raised by the Commission, but that the response does little to allay the CFMMEU’s concerns, in that the requirement under s.180 of the Act requires that an employer must take all reasonable steps. The CFMMEU contended that mentioning that a vote might take place in approximately a weeks’ time then 13 days later informing people the vote will take place tomorrow would not seem to satisfy the…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Glen Eden Constructions Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 2102
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues addressed by the Commission were whether the agreement provided for minimum terms and conditions of employment, and whether it had been genuinely negotiated between the parties. The Commission needed to determine if the agreement was free from any prohibited content, such as terms that undermined the operation of industrial instruments or allowed for the payment of less than the applicable award or agreement rate. Additionally, the Commission examined whether the agreement satisfied the 'better off overall test', ensuring that employees were not worse off under the proposed agreement compared to their existing terms.
The Fair Work Commission assessed the agreement based on the statutory criteria and found that it met the requirements under the Fair Work Act. The Commission noted that the agreement provided for minimum terms and conditions, did not contain any prohibited content, and satisfied the better off overall test. The Commission was satisfied with the evidence presented that the agreement had been genuinely negotiated and was fair and reasonable. Consequently, the Commission approved the enterprise agreement, finding it to be compliant with the relevant legal standards.
As a result of the Commission's decision, the Glen Eden Constructions Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2022-2026 was approved and will govern the employment terms and conditions between the company and its employees for the specified period. The agreement is now legally binding on both parties, and any disputes arising from its interpretation or application will be subject to the procedures outlined within the agreement and the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.