| [2017] FWCA 546 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Gladstone Community Linking Agency Inc. T/A Gladstone Community Linking Agency
(AG2017/54)
GLADSTONE COMMUNITY LINKING AGENCY INC. ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016
Social, community, home care and disability services | |
COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS | MELBOURNE, 25 JANUARY 2017 |
Application for approval of the Gladstone Community Linking Agency Inc. Enterprise Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Gladstone Community Linking Agency Inc. Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Gladstone Community Linking Agency Inc. T/As Gladstone Community Linking Agency. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings (the Undertakings). A copy of the Undertakings is attached in Annexure A to this decision. I am satisfied that the effect of accepting the Undertakings is not likely to:
(a) cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement; or
(b) result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] The views of each person who the Fair Work Commission knows is a bargaining representative for the Agreement have been sought in relation to the Undertakings.
[4] Pursuant to subsection 190(3) of the Act, I accept the Undertakings.
[5] Subject to the Undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 1 February 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 24 January 2021.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE423161 PR589709>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Gladstone Community Linking Agency Inc. T/A Gladstone Community Linking Agency [2017] FWCA 546
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 546
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the proposed agreement provided employees with a safety net of no worse than the applicable award or registered agreement, and whether the agreement was procedurally sound. The Commission needed to examine the fairness and reasonableness of the agreement's terms, particularly in light of any potential detriment to employees compared to the safety net provided by the applicable award. Additionally, the Commission had to consider whether the negotiation process was conducted in good faith and whether the agreement was made without coercion.
The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was fair and reasonable, meeting the better-off-overall test. The Commission acknowledged the improvements in pay and conditions that the agreement provided to the employees, which were considered to be of benefit to the employees overall. The Commission also noted that the negotiation process was conducted in good faith and without coercion. The agreement was therefore deemed to be compliant with the Fair Work Act 2009 and was approved. The Commission's decision ensured that the employees would benefit from the enhanced terms and conditions while still being protected by the safety net of minimum entitlements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.