Giroud v Sharif
[2014] NSWLEC 1119
•23 June 2014
Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Giroud & Anor v Sharif & Anor [2014] NSWLEC 1119 Hearing dates: 23 June 2014 Decision date: 23 June 2014 Jurisdiction: Class 2 Before: Moore SC
Galwey AC
Durland ACDecision: Application dismissed
Catchwords: TREE DISPUTE: tree on boundary; need for certainty of tree's location; no survey Legislation Cited: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Category: Principal judgment Parties: L & D Giroud (Applicants)
H & N Nehme (Respondents)Representation: First Applicant in person
First Respondent in person
Applicants in person
Mr D Simpson, solicitor
Redmond Hale Simpson (Respondents)
File Number(s): 20272 of 2014
Judgment
COMMISSIONERS: We have attended the site in Railway Parade, Carlton. We can see from the front of the property that the tree that is subject to application is straddling the fence that is located between the two properties.
There is no survey demonstrating on which side of the fence is the location of the dominant portion of the tree. There is no basis upon which we can conclude that the fence follows a properly surveyed boundary between the two properties.
As a consequence, we do not have any jurisdiction to entertain the application as we cannot be satisfied the tree is principally located on the respondents' property [see s 4(3) of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006].
This does not prevent the applicants and the respondents jointly approaching the local council to seek consent pursuant to the Tree Preservation Order for the removal of the tree - it does, however, in the absence of proof as to where the tree is principally located, exclude us from having any jurisdiction to order removal of the tree and override the provisions of the Tree Preservation Order.
As a consequence of the inability to determine the location of the tree, it is necessary that the application be dismissed and we so order.
Tim Moore David Galwey Lisa Durland
Senior Commissioner Acting Commissioner Acting Commissioner
Decision last updated: 25 June 2014
0
1