| [2015] FWCA 2205 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Gippsland & Southern Rural Water Corporation T/A Southern Rural Water
(AG2015/2092)
SOUTHERN RURAL WATER (SRW) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Water, sewerage and drainage services | |
COMMISSIONER BISSETT | MELBOURNE, 30 MARCH 2015 |
Application for approval of the Southern Rural Water (SRW) Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Southern Rural Water (SRW) Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Gippsland & Southern Rural Water Corporation T/A Southern Rural Water. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union, and The Australian Workers’ Union being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54(1) of the Act, will operate from 6 April 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 September 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE413313 PR562598>
- AGLC
- Gippsland & Southern Rural Water Corporation T/A Southern Rural Water [2015] FWCA 2205
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 2205
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues addressed by the Commission were whether the proposed agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it met the "better off overall test" (BOOT) to ensure employees were not disadvantaged by the new terms. This involved scrutiny of various clauses concerning wages, hours of work, leave provisions, and other employment conditions. The Commission also considered the process by which the agreement was negotiated and whether it adhered to the procedural fairness principles.
The Fair Work Commission concluded that the proposed agreement was compliant with the statutory requirements of the Fair Work Act. It found that the negotiation process was fair and that the agreement satisfied the better off overall test. The Commission approved the Southern Rural Water (SRW) Enterprise Agreement 2014, noting that it provided a fair and reasonable set of terms for employees, and did not lead to a detriment for any of the parties involved. This decision was based on detailed analysis and consideration of the evidence presented by both the employer and the employees' representatives.
The final orders of the Commission were that the Southern Rural Water (SRW) Enterprise Agreement 2014 be approved and registered, effective from the date of the decision. This approval signified that the agreement could be implemented as the governing document for employment terms within the corporation, thereby resolving the dispute in favour of the applicant.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.