Gingham and Gingham
Case
•
[2013] FamCA 727
•17 September 2013
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Gingham and Gingham [2013] FamCA 727
[2013] FamCA 727
17 September 2013
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Gingham and Gingham*, Hogan J of the Federal Court of Australia considered an Application in a Case filed on 27 September 2012. The specific nature of the dispute between the parties, the Applicant and the Respondent, is not detailed in the provided text, nor is the underlying cause of action.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether to grant the Applicant's Application in a Case. The Court was also required to determine the appropriate procedure for dealing with any subsequent application for costs by the Respondent, should they choose to pursue it.
Hogan J dismissed the Applicant's Application in a Case. The Court then outlined a detailed process for the Respondent to make submissions in support of an application for costs, followed by the Applicant's opportunity to respond and the Respondent's right to file brief further submissions in reply. The determination of any costs application will occur in Chambers.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether to grant the Applicant's Application in a Case. The Court was also required to determine the appropriate procedure for dealing with any subsequent application for costs by the Respondent, should they choose to pursue it.
Hogan J dismissed the Applicant's Application in a Case. The Court then outlined a detailed process for the Respondent to make submissions in support of an application for costs, followed by the Applicant's opportunity to respond and the Respondent's right to file brief further submissions in reply. The determination of any costs application will occur in Chambers.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Gingham and Gingham [2013] FamCA 727
Most Recent Citation
Swanson & Swanson [2022] FedCFamC2F 1705
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
1
Caracini & Paglietta
[2009] FamCAFC 188
Miller v Harrington
[2008] FamCAFC 150
Marsden & Winch
[2009] FamCAFC 152