Gilson and Gilson (Child support) [2023] AATA 840 (28 February 2023)
DIVISION:Social Services & Child Support Division
REVIEW NUMBER: 2022/MC024608
APPLICANT: Ms Gilson
OTHER PARTIES: Child Support Registrar
Mr Gilson
REVIEW NUMBER: 2022/MC024650
APPLICANT: Mr Gilson
OTHER PARTIES: Child Support Registrar
Ms Gilson
TRIBUNAL:Member M Douglas
DECISION DATE: 28 February 2023
DECISION:
The Tribunal sets aside the decision under review and, in substitution, decides that the annual rate of child support payable by Mr Gilson be varied to:
a)$23,400 for the period 1 January 2022 to 6 April 2022;
b)$15,600 for the period 7 April 2022 to 31 December 2023.
CATCHWORDS
CHILD SUPPORT – departure determination – income, property and financial resources of the liable parent – a ground for departure established – decision to depart - decision under review set aside and substituted
Names used in all published decisions are pseudonyms. Any references appearing in square brackets indicate that information has been omitted from this decision and replaced with generic information so as not to identify involved individuals as required by subsections 16(2AB)-16(2AC) of the Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988.
REASONS FOR DECISION
BACKGROUND
Ms Gilson and Mr Gilson are the separated parents of [Child 1], [Child 2] and [Child 3]. Assessments of child support have been issued for those children with the first taking effect on 20 May 2021.
Broadly speaking, an assessment of child support is made in accordance with the provisions of Part 5 of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (the Act). Those provisions prescribe a formula that applies to several variables to work out the amount of child support one parent must pay the other for their children. Those variables include the parents’ taxable incomes from the financial year before the start of the child support period to which the assessment relates, the level of care that each parent provides for their children, the cost of the children and whether a parent supports any children from a separate relationship. Section 98B of the Act permits a parent, if a parent believes there are special circumstances, to apply to Services Australia for a determination to be made to depart from those provisions. Services Australia describes such an application as a “change of assessment application”.
On 20 December 2021 Ms Gilson made such an application. At that time the assessment of child support, which was for the child support period 20 May 2021 to 28 February 2022, obligated Mr Gilson to pay child support to Ms Gilson for the children at an annual rate of $3,378. The assessment was calculated on an adjusted taxable income for Mr Gilson of $43,000 and an adjusted taxable income for Ms Gilson of nil. Mr Gilson’s adjusted taxable income reflected his taxable income for the 2020 financial year.
The assessment for the following child support period commencing 1 March 2022 obligated Mr Gilson to pay child support at an annual rate of $4,321. That was based on Mr Gilson’s adjusted taxable income of $47,900, which reflected his…
Continue reading Gilson and Gilson (Child support)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Gilson and Gilson (Child support) [2023] AATA 840
- Case
- [2023] AATA 840
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether a ground for departure was established based on the liable parent's financial circumstances. Specifically, the court had to assess whether the liable parent's actual income, property, and financial resources were significantly different from those presumed by the child support formula, and if this difference would result in an unjust or inequitable outcome if the assessment were not departed from.
The court found that a ground for departure was indeed established. In reaching this conclusion, the court considered the specific financial information presented regarding the liable parent's income, property, and financial resources. The court applied the principles of the *Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988* to these facts, determining that the disparity in financial circumstances justified a departure from the standard assessment to ensure a just and equitable outcome for the child. The decision to depart was upheld.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.