Gillfillan v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (No 2)
Case
•
[2013] NSWCA 143
•31 May 2013
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Gillfillan v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (No 2) [2013] NSWCA 143
[2013] NSWCA 143
31 May 2013
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appeal concerned the appropriate costs award following a decision where the appellants, Gillfillan and others, achieved only partial success against the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). The Court of Appeal of New South Wales was required to determine whether interest should be awarded on the costs ordered.
The central legal issue was how to apportion costs when a party has had mixed success on appeal. Specifically, the court had to consider whether the general rule that costs follow the event should be departed from, and if so, to what extent. Furthermore, the court was asked to determine whether the discretion to award interest on costs should be exercised in this instance, and if so, at what rate and for what period.
The court reasoned that while the appellants had not been entirely successful, their partial success was significant enough to warrant a departure from the usual order that the unsuccessful party pays the costs of the successful party. The court noted that ASIC had also achieved a degree of success. Consequently, the court ordered that each party should bear their own costs of the appeal. Regarding interest, the court declined to award interest on the costs, finding no exceptional circumstances to justify such an order in this particular case.
The central legal issue was how to apportion costs when a party has had mixed success on appeal. Specifically, the court had to consider whether the general rule that costs follow the event should be departed from, and if so, to what extent. Furthermore, the court was asked to determine whether the discretion to award interest on costs should be exercised in this instance, and if so, at what rate and for what period.
The court reasoned that while the appellants had not been entirely successful, their partial success was significant enough to warrant a departure from the usual order that the unsuccessful party pays the costs of the successful party. The court noted that ASIC had also achieved a degree of success. Consequently, the court ordered that each party should bear their own costs of the appeal. Regarding interest, the court declined to award interest on the costs, finding no exceptional circumstances to justify such an order in this particular case.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Remedies
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Judicial Review
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Thompson v NSW Land and Housing Corporation (No 3) [2013] NSWSC 1658
Cases Citing This Decision
5
McKeith v Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC; Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC v James (No 2)
[2016] NSWCA 260
Western Land Developments Pty Limited v Maganic Brothers and Sister Pty Limited (No. 4)
[2016] NSWSC 1506
Grace v Grace (No 9)
[2014] NSWSC 1239
Cases Cited
8
Statutory Material Cited
5
Gillfillan v Australian Securities and Investments Commission
[2012] NSWCA 370
Morley v Australian Securities and Investments Commission
[2010] NSWCA 331