District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Giles Payne & Co v Penson [2016] NSWDC 72 Hearing dates: 18 March 2016 Date of orders: 18 March 2016 Decision date: 18 March 2016 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Neilson DCJ Decision: Clause (3) to the schedule of the subpoena for production, sealed on 16 February 2016, issued at the request of the appellant and addressed to the first and second respondents in these proceedings set aside
Appellant to pay the respondents' costs of the motion
Costs thrown away on 11 March 2016 are the respondents' costs in the notice of motion
Stood over for directions on Friday 13 May 2016Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Motion to set aside, in part, subpoena issued by Appellant – Principal proceedings appeal against decision of costs review panel – Appellant wishes to view electronic documents which record each piece of work done by each practitioner or employee in the respondent firm – Relief sought in appeal is remitter for fresh determination, therefore appellant cannot agitate, on appeal, the quantum of charges made or whether the services were provided – Category of documents which the appellant seeks is irrelevant and extraneous to the appeal
COSTS – Costs of motion to set aside, in part, subpoena issued by appellant – Appellant sought costs of preparation of meeting whole of subpoena – Limiting of issues would have be anticipated by any reasonable person upon reading affidavit supporting motion – Litigant in person must act reasonably, must act rationally, must act coherently and must read carefully the material presented – Costs ought to follow eventLegislation Cited: Legal Profession Act 2004
Legal Professional Uniform Law Application Act 2014
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW)Cases Cited: Penson v Joseph John Gilles trading as Giles Payne & Co [2013] NSWSC 1796 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Joseph John Gilles trading as Giles Payne & Co (Applicant/Respondent)
Shirely Penson (Respondent/Appellant)Representation: Mr L Fermanis (Applicant/Respondent)
In person (Respondent/Appellant)
File Number(s): 2015/00274066 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
HIS HONOUR: Before me is notice of motion filed on 23 February 2006. The first prayer in the notice of motion is this:
"Pursuant to r 33.4 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), the subpoena filed by the appellant on 16 February 2015 be set aside."
Prior to the luncheon adjournment, I granted leave to the respondent to amend that prayer so that it now reads thus:
"Pursuant to r 33.4 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) cl (3) of the schedule to the subpoena filed by the appellant on 16 February 2016 be set aside."
-
To understand the nature of the dispute currently before me it is important to bear in mind the background to the current proceedings. These proceedings were commenced by a summons commencing an appeal filed on 18 September 2015. Under the heading "Details of Appeal" are cited the following matters:
"(1) this appeal is brought under the Legal Professional Act 2004,
(2) the appellant has filed…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Giles Payne and Co v Penson and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2016] NSWDC 72
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues in this case centred around the appellant's motion to set aside, in part, a subpoena issued by them. The appellant sought costs of preparation of the meeting for the whole of the subpoena. The court found that the limiting of issues would have been anticipated by any reasonable person upon reading the affidavit supporting the motion. The court emphasised that a litigant in person must act reasonably, rationally, coherently and read carefully the material presented. The court found that costs ought to follow the event.
The court set aside Clause (3) to the schedule of the subpoena for production, sealed on 16 February 2016, issued at the request of the appellant and addressed to the first and second respondents in these proceedings. The court ordered that the appellant pay the respondents' costs of the motion. The costs thrown away on 11 March 2016 are the respondents' costs in the notice of motion. The matter was stood over for directions on Friday 13 May 2016.
Orders
Orders of the court
Clause (3) to the schedule of the subpoena for production, sealed on 16 February 2016, issued at the request of the appellant and addressed to the first and second respondents in these proceedings set aside
Appellant to pay the respondents' costs of the motion
Costs thrown away on 11 March 2016 are the respondents' costs in the notice of motion
Stood over for directions on Friday 13 May 2016
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.