FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| GERZINA v REPATRIATION COMMISSION | [2003] FMCA 490 |
| ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Appeal from Administrative Appeals Tribunal – post traumatic stress disorder – Veterans Entitlements Act 1975 – war caused disease – whether diagnostic criteria for post traumatic stress disorder requires finding of “intense horror” or “horror” – meaning of “intense fear, helplessness or horror”. |
Veterans Entitlements Act 1975, ss.9(1)(a), 9(1)(b), 13(1)
Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, s.44
Repatriation Commission v Cooke (1998) 160 ALR 17
Benjamin v Repatriation Commission (2001) 34 AAR 270
Kuswardana v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1981) 54 FLR 335
Woodward v Repatriation Commission (2003) 200 ALR 332
Hill v Repatriation Commission (2001) FCA 1775
Repatriation Commission v Hill (2002) 69 ALD 581
Richardson v Austin (1911) 12 CLR 463
Harris v Repatriation Commission (2000) 32 AAR 84
Knight v Repatriation Commission (2002) FCA 103
| Applicant: | ALDO ANDRE GERZINA |
| Respondent: | REPATRIATION COMMISSION |
| File No: | MZ 668 of 2003 |
| Delivered on: | 7 November 2003 |
| Delivered at: | Melbourne |
| Hearing Date: | 6 October 2003 |
| Judgment of: | McInnis FM |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Mr Moore |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Peter J Liefman |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Mr P. Hanks QC, with Ms J. McDonnell |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | Australian Government Solicitor |
ORDERS
The Application dated 1 April 2003 be dismissed.
The Applicant shall pay the Respondent’s costs pursuant to the Federal Court scale up to and including the date of transfer from the Federal Court to the Federal Magistrates Court and thereafter pursuant to Schedule 1 of the Federal Magistrates Court Rules with the costs to be taxed in default of agreement pursuant to Order 62 of the Federal Court Rules.
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT MELBOURNE |
MZ 668 of 2003
| ALDO ANDRE GERZINA |
Applicant
and
| REPATRIATION COMMISSION |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
By an application filed in the Federal Court and dated 1 April 2003 Aldo Andre Gerzina, the applicant, seeks to appeal from a decision of the Veterans Appeals Division of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. The decision which is the subject of the appeal was made by the AAT on 5 March 2003. This application was transferred to the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia by order of the Federal Court made on 19 June 2003.
The appeal relates to a decision made by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal following a decision before that tribunal of the Repatriation Commission made on 9 September 1999, affirmed by the Veterans Review Board (VRB) on 5 December 2000.
The notice of appeal in the present application essentially raises a single ground of appeal. The ground of appeal in the notice reads as follows:
“The Tribunal erred in law in finding that the diagnostic criteria for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (ICD_9-CM CODE 309.81) set out in the ‘Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders’ Fourth Edition required it to find on the evidence before it that the Applicant's response to a traumatic event involved ‘intense horror’, and distinct from ‘horror’ simpliciter, before it could conclude that…
Continue reading Gerzina v Repatriation Commission
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Gerzina v Repatriation Commission [2003] FMCA 490
- Case
- [2003] FMCA 490
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine whether the Repatriation Commission correctly applied the relevant statutory provisions in denying Gerzina's claim. Additionally, the court needed to assess if there were any procedural flaws in the Commission's decision-making that might have prejudiced Gerzina's rights. The court also examined whether the Commission's interpretation of the statutory provisions was consistent with the legislative intent and whether there were any errors in law that warranted overturning the Commission's decision.
After a thorough review of the statutory provisions, the legislative intent, and the Commission's decision-making process, the court found that the Repatriation Commission had correctly applied the relevant provisions of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986. The court held that there were no procedural errors that prejudiced Gerzina's rights, and the Commission's interpretation of the statutory provisions was consistent with the legislative intent. Consequently, the court dismissed Gerzina's application. The court also ordered that Gerzina pay the Repatriation Commission's costs in accordance with the specified scale and rules.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The Application dated 1 April 2003 be dismissed.
2.
The Applicant shall pay the Respondent’s costs pursuant to the Federal Court scale up to and including the date of transfer from the Federal Court to the Federal Magistrates Court and thereafter pursuant to Schedule 1 of the Federal Magistrates Court Rules with the costs to be taxed in default of agreement pursuant to Order 62 of the Federal Court Rules.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.