| [2015] FWCA 5971 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
George Weston Foods Pty Ltd t/a George Weston Foods Speedibake
(AG2015/4352)
SPEEDIBAKE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT KOVACIC | MELBOURNE, 28 AUGUST 2015 |
Application for approval of the Speedibake Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Speedibake Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by George Weston Foods Pty Ltd t/a George Weston Foods Speedibake. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] Subject to concerns that have been addressed by way of undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] As noted, pursuant to s.190(3), I have accepted undertakings from George Weston Foods Pty Ltd t/a George Weston Foods Speedibake. In accordance with s.191(1) of the Act the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the undertakings are attached to this decision.
[4] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 4 September 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 29 April 2017.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE415495 PR571337>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- George Weston Foods Pty Ltd t/a George Weston Foods Speedibake [2015] FWCA 5971
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 5971
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court centred on whether the agreement contained all the mandated terms and conditions as stipulated by the Fair Work Act, and whether the negotiation process complied with the procedural fairness requirements. Specifically, the court had to determine if the union had genuinely negotiated the agreement and if the agreement met the criteria for a certified agreement.
The court examined the evidence and submissions from both parties. It found that the agreement was genuinely negotiated and contained all the required terms and conditions, including those related to pay and conditions, dispute resolution, and employee benefits. The court also concluded that the negotiation process was procedurally fair and that the union had adequately represented the employees. Based on these findings, the court approved the Speedibake Enterprise Agreement 2015.
The final orders of the court were that the Speedibake Enterprise Agreement 2015 be approved and registered under the Fair Work Act. This decision ensures that the terms and conditions outlined in the agreement are legally binding and enforceable between the company and its employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.