| [2020] FWCA 4896 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
George Weston Foods Ltd T/A MAURI
(AG2020/2122)
MAURI - (ENFIELD) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2020
Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT CROSS | SYDNEY, 11 SEPTEMBER 2020 |
Application for approval of the MAURI - (Enfield) Enterprise Agreement 2020.
[1] An application has been made for the approval of an enterprise agreement known as the MAURI – (Enfield) Enterprise Agreement 2020 (‘the Agreement’). The application was made by George Weston Foods Ltd (‘the Applicant’) pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (‘the Act’). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that the relevant requirements of ss 186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act concerning this application for approval have been met, with the provision of written undertakings from the Applicant addressing miscellaneous matters. Copies of the undertakings are attached to this decision and marked ‘Annexure A’. I note that the undertakings are taken to be terms of the Agreement.
[3] The United Workers Union (“the UWU”), have given notice under s 183 of the Act that they wish to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s 201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the UWU.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s 54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this approval decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2021.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE508998 PR722723>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- George Weston Foods Ltd T/A MAURI [2020] FWCA 4896
- Case
- [2020] FWCA 4896
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to decide if the proposed changes in the enterprise agreement complied with the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act. This included examining whether the agreement was fairly negotiated and if it provided for the minimum entitlements prescribed by the Act. The court also needed to consider the impact of the changes on the employees' rights and if the agreement adequately protected the employees’ interests.
The court found that the agreement was fairly negotiated and met the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The changes proposed were deemed to be in the best interests of the employees as they provided for improved terms and conditions, while still meeting the minimum standards set by the Act. The court also noted that the agreement provided adequate protections for the employees, ensuring their rights were not adversely affected by the changes.
The Fair Work Commission approved the MAURI (Enfield) Enterprise Agreement 2020. The court determined that the agreement was compliant with the Fair Work Act and that the applicants had met their obligations in negotiating the changes with the employees' representatives.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.