General Motors-Holden's Automotive Limited v Robbins

Case

[1994] HCATrans 468

No judgment structure available for this case.

'

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry

Adelaide No A25 of 1994

B e t w e e n -

GENERAL MOTORS-HOLDEN'S

AUTOMOTIVE LIMITED

Applicant

and

MARK ROBBINS

First Respondent

GRAHAM HARBORD

Second Respondent

Application for special leave

to appeal

MASON CJ

Motors 15 26/8/94

TOOHEY J

McHUGH J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT ADELAIDE ON FRIDAY, 26 AUGUST 1994, AT 9.55 AM

(Continued from 25/8/94)

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

MASON CJ:  Having regard to the scheme of Part VI of the

Workers Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1986,

the Court is not persuaded that the terms of the
order made by the Full Court necessarily give rise

to any question of general principle sufficient to

attract a grant of special leave to appeal. The
application is therefore refused.
MR HEYWOOD-SMITH:  I would ask for an order for costs, if

the Court pleases.

MASON CJ:  You do not oppose that, Mr Walsh?
MR WALSH:  No, I do not, Your Honour.
MASON CJ:  The application is refused with costs.

AT 9.56 AM THE MATTER WAS ADJOURNED SINE DIE

Motors 16 26/8/94

Areas of Law

  • Employment Law

  • Statutory Interpretation

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Costs

  • Jurisdiction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0