Gemelli v ARCHFIELD Holdings Pty Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 16 min read
GEMELLI -v- ARCHFIELD HOLDINGS PTY LTD [2004] WADC 193
Last Update:  29/09/2004
GEMELLI -v- ARCHFIELD HOLDINGS PTY LTD [2004] WADC 193
Jurisdiction: DISTRICT COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   Citation No: [2004] WADC 193
Case No: CIVO:148/2004   Heard: 23 AUGUST 2004
Coram: O'BRIEN DCJ   Delivered: 24/09/2004
Location: PERTH   Supplementary Decision:
No of Pages: 12   Judgment Part: 1 of 1
Result: Leave to commence proceedings granted
Parties: ROBERT GEMELLI
ARCHFIELD HOLDINGS PTY LTD

Catchwords: Application for leave to commence proceedings pursuant to s 93D(4) of the Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 1981 Turns on own facts
Legislation: Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 1981

Case References: Glen-Craig Villages Pty Ltd v Donaghy (1992) 7 WAR 122
Newcombe v AME Properties Ltd (1995) 14 WAR 259
Sampson v Industrial Progress Corporation Pty Ltd, unreported; FCt SCt of WA; Library No 970058; 21 February 1997
Thomas v O'Shea (1989) A Tort Rep 80-251
Waddington v Silver Chain Association (1998) 20 WAR 269
Whittall-Wood v Drake Overload, unreported; FCt SCt of WA; Library No 920279; 22 May 1992

Andrews v Electricity Commission, unreported; DCt of WA; Library No 4454; 22 May 1995
Eng Mee Yong v Letchumanan [1980] AC 331
Lend Lease Employer Systems Ltd v Lydon, unreported; FCt SCt of WA; Library No 980088; 27 February 1998
Mackenzie v Disability Services Commission, unreported; DCt of WA; Library No 4975; 28 June 1996
Pemberton v Chappell (1987) 1 NZLR 1
Pollitt v Midland Brick Co (1995) 14 SR (WA) 251
Re Monger; ex parte Cross [2004] WASCA 176
Sgro v New Cement Co Pty Ltd (1995) 15 SR (WA) 44

JURISDICTION : DISTRICT COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA

                  IN CHAMBERS
LOCATION : PERTH CITATION : GEMELLI -v- ARCHFIELD HOLDINGS PTY LTD [2004] WADC 193 CORAM : O'BRIEN DCJ HEARD : 23 AUGUST 2004 DELIVERED : 24 SEPTEMBER 2004 FILE NO/S : CIVO 148 of 2004 BETWEEN : ROBERT GEMELLI
                  Applicant

                  AND

                  ARCHFIELD HOLDINGS PTY LTD
                  Respondent



Catchwords:

Application for leave to commence proceedings pursuant to s 93D(4) of the Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 1981 - Turns on own facts


Legislation:

Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 1981


Result:

Leave to commence proceedings granted


(Page 2)

Representation:

Counsel:


    Applicant : Mr B L Nugawela
    Respondent : Mr J R Wilson


Solicitors:

    Applicant : Bradley & Bayly
    Respondent : Srdarov Richards Burton


Case(s) referred to in judgment(s):

Glen-Craig Villages Pty Ltd v Donaghy (1992) 7 WAR 122
Newcombe v AME Properties Ltd (1995) 14 WAR 259
Sampson v Industrial Progress Corporation Pty Ltd, unreported; FCt SCt of WA; Library No 970058; 21 February 1997
Thomas v O'Shea (1989) A Tort Rep 80-251
Waddington v Silver Chain Association (1998) 20 WAR 269
Whittall-Wood v Drake Overload, unreported; FCt SCt of WA; Library No 920279; 22 May 1992

Case(s) also cited:

Andrews v Electricity Commission, unreported; DCt of WA; Library No 4454; 22 May 1995
Eng Mee Yong v Letchumanan [1980] AC 331
Lend Lease Employer Systems Ltd v Lydon, unreported; FCt SCt of WA; Library No 980088; 27 February 1998
Mackenzie…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Gemelli v ARCHFIELD Holdings Pty Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2004] WADC 193
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Gemelli, sought leave to commence proceedings against ARCHFIELD Holdings Pty Ltd under section 93D(4) of the Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 1981. The dispute arose from an injury sustained by Gemelli during his employment, and he claimed that the employer had breached their duty of care under the Act. The application was heard in the Industrial Court of Queensland.

The central legal issue was whether the applicant had demonstrated a prima facie case sufficient to warrant leave to commence proceedings. The court had to determine whether Gemelli had established a valid claim for damages under the Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 1981. Specifically, the court needed to assess if the employer had breached their duty of care towards Gemelli and whether the breach led to the injury.

The court concluded that Gemelli had presented a prima facie case warranting leave to commence proceedings. It found that the evidence provided supported the claim that the employer had breached their duty of care, leading to Gemelli's injury. The court determined that the application satisfied the criteria set out in section 93D(4) of the Act, granting Gemelli the leave to commence proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

Leave to commence proceedings granted

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.