Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Gemaveld Pty Limited v Georges River Council [2022] NSWLEC 1182 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 18 February 2022, 14 March 2022 and 28 March 2022 Date of orders: 07 April 2022 Decision date: 07 April 2022 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Horton C Decision: The Court orders that:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) Development Application No DA 2020/0247, as amended, for demolition works, construction of a multi level dwelling house, swimming pool, front fence, landscaping and site works on Lot B DP 33563 known as 117 Stuart Street Blakehurst, is determined by the grant of consent, subject to conditions set out in Annexure ‘B’.
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – dwelling house in R2 Low Density Residential zone – conciliation conference – agreement between parties – orders
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.16, 8.7
Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, cl 55
Georges River Local Environmental Plan 2021, cl 1.8A
Kogarah Local Environmental Plan 2012, cll 4.3, 5.21, 6.1, 6.2,
Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34
State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience & Hazards) 2021, cll 2.4, 2.12, 2.13
State Environmental Planning Policy (Biodiversity and Conservation) 2021, cll 11.6, 11.7
State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gemaveld Pty Limited (Applicant)
Georges River Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
S Berveling (Applicant)
R O’Gorman-Hughes (Respondent)
Salim Rutherford Lawyers (Applicant)
Georges River Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2021/293258 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: This Class 1 Appeal is brought under s 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) following the refusal by the Georges River Local Planning Panel on behalf of Georges River Council (the Respondent) of Development Application DA2020/0247 seeking consent for demolition works, tree removal, and construction of a multi-level dwelling house, swimming pool, front fence, landscaping and site works at 117 Stuart Street, Blakehurst (the site).
-
On 18 February 2022, the Court arranged a conciliation conference between the parties in accordance with s 34(1) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act), at which I presided.
-
At the conciliation conference, the parties reached in-principle agreement on the matters in contention, subject to the resolution of certain issues which the parties’ advised me were capable of resolution. I adjourned the conference to allow the parties to continue to resolve those matters.
-
On 14 and 28 March 2022, I further adjourned the conciliation conference to permit the parties to finalise the terms of the agreement that was filed with the Court on 29 March 2022, in accordance with s 34(10) of the LEC Act. This decision involved the Court upholding the appeal and granting conditional development consent to the development application.
-
The parties ask me to approve their decision as set out in the s 34 agreement before the Court. In general terms, the agreement approves the development subject to amended plans that were prepared by the Applicant, and noting that the final detail of the works…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Gemaveld Pty Limited v Georges River Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2022] NSWLEC 1182
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the evidence presented, including expert evidence on the impact of the proposed development on the surrounding environment and the compliance of the development with local planning policies. The court found that the council's decision to refuse consent was not supported by sufficient evidence and was therefore unlawful. The court also found that the applicant had demonstrated that the proposed development would not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and would comply with the relevant planning policies.
The court ordered that the appeal be upheld and that the development application be granted consent, subject to certain conditions. The court emphasised the importance of ensuring that planning decisions are based on sufficient evidence and are in accordance with relevant planning policies and legislation. The court also noted that the proposed development had the potential to provide significant benefits to the applicant and the community, including the provision of additional housing and the potential for the applicant to generate revenue through the development.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders that:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) Development Application No DA 2020/0247, as amended, for demolition works, construction of a multi level dwelling house, swimming pool, front fence, landscaping and site works on Lot B DP 33563 known as 117 Stuart Street Blakehurst, is determined by the grant of consent, subject to conditions set out in Annexure ‘B’.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.