Gee N Gee Pty Limited v Canterbury-Bankstown Council

Case

[2017] NSWLEC 1432

11 August 2017

No judgment structure available for this case.

Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Gee N Gee Pty Limited v Canterbury-Bankstown Council [2017] NSWLEC 1432
Hearing dates: Conciliation Conference on 11 August 2017
Date of orders: 11 August 2017
Decision date: 11 August 2017
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Martin SC
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Cases Cited: Nil
Texts Cited: Nil
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Gee N Gee Pty Limited(Applicant)
Canterbury-Bankstown Council (Respondent)
Representation: Mr D Creais (Solicitor) (Applicant)
Mr A Seton (Solicitor) (Respondent)
File Number(s): 32177 of 2017
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The appeal is upheld.

  2. The Applicant is granted leave to amend Development Application No.DA-256/2016 and to rely upon the following amended plans and documents, copies of which are behind Annexure “A”:

Drawing No.

Drawing Name

Prepared by

Date

DA000, Revision E

Cover Sheet

CD Architects

10 July 2017

DA100, Revision E

Basement 2 Floor Plan

CD Architects

10 July 2017

DA101, Revision E

Basement 1 Floor Plan

CD Architects

10 July 2017

DA102, Revision D

Ground Floor Plan

CD Architects

10 July 2017

DA103, Revision D

Level 01 Floor Plan

CD Architects

20 June 2017

DA104, Revision D

Level 02 Floor Plan

CD Architects

20 June 2017

DA105, Revision E

Level 03 Floor Plan

CD Architects

10 July 2017

DA106, Revision E

Level 04 Floor Plan

CD Architects

10 July 2017

DA107, Revision E

Level 05 Floor Plan

CD Architects

10 July 2017

DA108, Revision E

Rooftop Floor Plan

CD Architects

10 July 2017

DA200, Revision D

East & West Elevations

CD Architects

10 July 2017

DA201, Revision D

North & South Elevations

CD Architects

20 June 2017

DA300, Revision D

Section A

CD Architects

10 July 2017

DA301, Revision D

Section B

CD Architects

10 July 2017

DA302, Revision E

Section C

CD Architects

10 July 2017

DA310, Revision D

Ramp Section

CD Architects

10 July 2017

DA708, Revision B

Detailed Section Adjoining Building Interface (Sheet 1)

CD Architects

10 July 2017

DA709, Revision B

Detailed Section Adjoining Building Interface (Sheet 2)

CD Architects

10 July 2017

DA900, Revision B

Typical Floor to Floor Details Section – 3.0m – 150mm Slab

CD Architects

10 July 2017

  1. The Applicant is to pay the Respondent’s costs pursuant to section 97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, as agreed or assessed.

  2. Development Application No. DA-256/2016 (as amended) for the construction of a six-storey mixed use development containing two ground floor commercial tenancies, 47 residential units and two levels of basement car parking on Lots 21 and 22 in Deposited Plan 3970, otherwise known as 349-357 Beamish Street, Campsie, be approved subject to the conditions contained at Annexure “B”.

…………….

Rosemary Martin

Senior Commissioner

32177.17 (Annexure A) (4.74 MB, pdf)

32177.17 (Annexure B) (279 KB, pdf)

Decision last updated: 11 August 2017

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

1