Geary v Cessnock City Council

Link copied
Case Copied 12 min read

Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: Geary v Cessnock City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1397
Hearing dates: 26 July 2017
Date of orders: 01 August 2017
Decision date: 01 August 2017
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: O’Neill C
Decision:

1.   The appeal is dismissed.
2.   Development Application No. 8/2016/337/1 for the change of use of an existing garage to a dwelling, at 10 Glennie Street, Ellalong, is refused.
3.   The exhibits, other than exhibits 1, 6, A, C and F, are returned.

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: change of use from a garage in a shed to a dwelling; whether the proposal is consistent with the existing character of development in the street; privacy impacts.
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Cases Cited: Ireland v Cessnock City Council (1999) 103 LGERA 285
Texts Cited: Nil
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Mr Allan Geary (Applicant)
Cessnock City Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
Mr K. Nichols agent (Applicant)
Mr A. Pickup solicitor (Respondent)

  Solicitors:
Local Government Legal (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/81584
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to the provisions of s 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) against the refusal of Development Application No. 8/2016/337/1 for the change of use of an existing garage in a shed to a dwelling and ancillary alterations and additions (the proposal) at 10 Glennie Street, Ellalong (the site) by Cessnock City Council (the Council).

  2. The appeal was subject to mandatory conciliation on 26 July 2017, in accordance with the provisions of s 34AA of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act). As agreement was not reached during the conciliation conference, it was terminated and a hearing held forthwith, pursuant to s 34AA(2)(b)(i) of the LEC Act.

Issues

  1. The Council’s contentions can be summarised as:

  • The dwelling as proposed will be out of character with the existing character in Glennie Street and the proposal is contrary to the zone objectives;

  • The elevated verandah at the rear of the shed will result in overlooking of the rear yard of 12 Glennie Street;

  • Approving a change of use from a shed to a dwelling will set an undesirable planning precedent for the conversion and use of sheds as dwellings and it is not in the public interest to do so.

The site and its context

  1. The site has an area of 2131sqm with a frontage of 20m to Glennie Street. The site is on the eastern side of Glennie Street. The neighbouring dwellings on the eastern side of Glennie Street are single storey bungalows, some with a separate garage structure. The allotment sizes on both sides of the street vary widely and 10 Glennie Street is a comparatively narrow allotment when compared to some of the neighbouring properties.

Background and the proposal

  1. The shed currently accommodates a double garage with dwelling at the rear of the shed, consisting of a bedroom, a living/dining/kitchen room and a bathroom. There is…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Geary v Cessnock City Council and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2017] NSWLEC 1397
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Geary v Cessnock City Council involved a dispute concerning a development application. Geary, the applicant, sought to change the use of an existing garage at 10 Glennie Street, Ellalong, to a dwelling. The Cessnock City Council, the respondent, refused the application, leading Geary to appeal the decision. The appeal was heard in the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales. The court had to determine whether the council's decision to refuse the development application was lawful, reasonable, and in accordance with the relevant planning and zoning laws.

The legal issues before the court centred on the interpretation and application of the Cessnock City Council Local Environment Plan 2012 and the relevant provisions of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW). The primary concern was whether the proposed change of use of the garage to a dwelling complied with the zoning and planning regulations. The court also had to consider whether the council's decision was supported by sufficient evidence and whether it was a proper exercise of the council's statutory powers.

The court found that the proposed change of use did not comply with the zoning regulations and the council's local environment plan. The evidence presented demonstrated that the proposed dwelling would not be in keeping with the character of the area and would result in adverse impacts on neighbouring properties. The court was satisfied that the council's decision was based on relevant considerations and was not unreasonable. The appeal was dismissed, and the development application was refused. The exhibits, except for specified ones, were to be returned to the parties.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Development Application No. 8/2016/337/1 for the change of use of an existing garage to a dwelling, at 10 Glennie Street, Ellalong, is refused.

3. The exhibits, other than exhibits 1, 6, A, C and F, are returned.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.