| [2014] FWCA 6755 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
GD Engineering & Construction Pty Ltd
(AG2014/7407)
GD ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION GAS PLANTS, WATER PLANTS, PIPELINES, CIVIL AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS | BRISBANE, 24 SEPTEMBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the GD Engineering & Construction Gas Plants, Water Plants, Pipelines, Civil and Infrastructure Works Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) was made on 4 September 2014 by GD Engineering & Construction Pty Ltd for the approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the GD Engineering & Construction Gas Plants, Water Plants, Pipelines, Civil and Infrastructure Works Enterprise Agreement 2014(“the Agreement”).
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Australian Workers’ Union (“the AWU”) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the AWU.
[4] The consultation clause does not conform with s.205 of the Act. Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Regulations is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE410335 PR555908>
- AGLC
- GD Engineering & Construction Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 6755
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 6755
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues before the court were whether the agreement met the requirements for being a ‘single-enterprise agreement’ under the Fair Work Act and whether it complied with procedural fairness. The court had to determine if the agreement was genuinely negotiated and if it contained the necessary provisions to be considered a modern award. Additionally, the court examined whether there was sufficient evidence to show that the agreement was not disadvantageous to the employees.
The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was a single-enterprise agreement and had been genuinely negotiated. It also held that the agreement complied with all the necessary statutory requirements and did not disadvantage employees. The court noted that the process of negotiation was thorough and involved multiple meetings with the unions. The agreement was deemed to be fair and balanced, with provisions that were consistent with the objectives of the Fair Work Act.
The Fair Work Commission approved the GD Engineering & Construction Gas Plants, Water Plants, Pipelines, Civil and Infrastructure Works Enterprise Agreement 2014. The decision confirmed the validity of the agreement and its compliance with the relevant legislative framework.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.