Gavin WILLIAMS v The Queen

Case [2011] ACTCA 24


GAVIN WILLIAMS v THE QUEEN
[2011] ACTCA 24 (10 November 2011)

APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – general principles – in general and right of appeal – appeal against conviction on plea of guilty – no grounds on which to permit plea of guilty to be withdrawn – appeal dismissed.

APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – general principles – in general and right of appeal – appeal against conviction – adjournment refused by trial judge – no error in refusing adjournment – appeal dismissed.

APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – general principles – in general and right of appeal – appeal against sentence – appeal against sentence withdrawn – appeal dismissed.

Crimes (Sentence Administration) Act 2005 (ACT)

Meissner v The Queen (1995) 184 CLR 132
R v Gomez (2007) 1 ACTLR 145

ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY

No. ACTCA 32 of 2009
No. SCC 107 of 2008
No. SCC 169 of 2008

Judges:         Refshauge, Penfold and Lander JJ
Court of Appeal of the Australian Capital Territory
Date:            10 November 2011

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE       )          No. ACTCA 32 of 2009
  )          No. SCC 107 of 2008
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY    )          No. SCC 169 of 2008
  )

COURT OF APPEAL  )

ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY

BETWEEN:GAVIN WILLIAMS

Appellant

AND:THE QUEEN

Respondent

ORDER

Judges:  Refshauge, Penfold and Lander JJ
Date:  10 November 2011
Place:  Canberra

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

  1. The appeal be dismissed.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE       )          No. ACTCA 32 of 2009
  )          No. SCC 107 of 2008
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY    )          No. SCC 169 of 2008
  )

COURT OF APPEAL  )

ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY

BETWEEN:GAVIN WILLIAMS

Appellant

AND:THE QUEEN

Respondent

Judges:  Refshauge, Penfold and Lander JJ
Date:  10 November 2011
Place:  Canberra

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

REFSHAUGE AND LANDER JJ:

  1. On 15 October 2009, the appellant was convicted on his own plea of guilty of one charge of assault on a Mr Gardner, and one charge of contravening a protection order.

  1. The appellant’s plea to the two charges was accepted by the respondent in satisfaction of an indictment that included a second count of assault on Mr Gardner.

  1. The following day, the court ordered that the appellant be released immediately on the following conditions:

(a)       the offender sign an undertaking to comply with the conditions of this order;

(b)       the offender be of good behaviour for a period of 12 months;

(c) the offender comply with the offender’s good behaviour obligations including, the core conditions of the order, under sections 85 and 86 of the Crimes (Sentence Administration) Act 2005;

(d)       the offender is to perform 120 hours of community service in respect of each count to be completed in a period of 12 months from today;

(e)       the offender is to present himself to Corrective Services within 7 days;

(f)        the…

Continue reading Gavin WILLIAMS v The Queen

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Gavin WILLIAMS v The Queen [2011] ACTCA 24
Case
[2011] ACTCA 24
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Court of Criminal Appeal of New South Wales heard an appeal by Gavin Williams against his conviction. The appeal concerned both the conviction itself, which followed a plea of guilty, and the sentence imposed.

The primary legal issues before the Court were whether the trial judge erred in refusing an adjournment of the proceedings and whether there were grounds to permit the appellant to withdraw his plea of guilty. The appeal against sentence was withdrawn by the appellant.

The Court found no error in the trial judge's refusal of the adjournment, determining that the circumstances did not warrant such an intervention. Furthermore, the Court concluded that there were no valid grounds upon which to allow the withdrawal of the guilty plea. Consequently, the appeal against conviction was dismissed. The appeal against sentence was also dismissed as it had been withdrawn.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The appeal be dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.