Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Gates v The Owners - Strata Plan No 5165 [2024] NSWCATCD 53 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 25 September 2024 Decision date: 25 September 2024 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: G Blake AM SC, Senior Member Decision: (1) The costs application of the respondent is dismissed.
(2) Each of the applicants and the respondent are to pay their costs of the interim application.
Catchwords: COSTS – costs application by the respondent – principles – withdrawal of interim application - no hearing on the merits – costs application dismissed
Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), ss 5, 36, 45, 60
Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), s 596
Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW), ss 102, 106
Uniform Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42.20
Cases Cited: Balout v Bella Ikea Cronulla Pty Ltd (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 1173
BDK v Department of Education and Communities [2015] NSWCATAP 129
Brodyn Pty Ltd v Owners Corporation Strata Plan 73019 (No 2) [2016] NSWCATAP 224
Brunsprop Pty Ltd v Joanne Hay & Wes Davies [2015] NSWCATAP 152
CPD Holdings Pty Ltd t/as The Bathroom Exchange v Baguley [2015] NSWCATAP 21
eMove Pty Ltd v Naomi Dickinson [2015] NSWCATAP 94
Fitzgerald v Woolworths Ltd [2017] FWCFB 2797; (2017) 270 IR 128
Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, Re Minister for; ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622; [1997] HCA 6
Knox v Bollen; Bollen v Knox [2018] NSWCATAP 106
MacDermott v Wang [2022] NSWCATCD 71
New Island Developments Pty Ltd v New Island Investments One Pty Ltd (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 454
N & T Buildings Pty Ltd v Ball [2018] NSWCATAP 83
Nichols v NFS Agribusiness Pty Ltd (2018) 97 NSWLR 681; [2018] NSWCA 84
ONE.TEL Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2000) 101 FCR 548; [2000] FCA 270
The Owners – Strata Plan 5319 v Price [2020] NSWCATAP 245
Texts Cited: None cited
Category: Costs Parties: Judith Gates and Paul Carpenter (Applicants)
The Owners - Strata Plan No 5165 (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
Sarvaas Ciappara Lawyers (Applicants)
Kerin Benson Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2024/00260610 Publication restriction: Nil
REASONS FOR DECISION
Overview
-
On 16 August 2024, the application in these proceedings by the applicants, Judith Gates (Ms Gates) and Paul Carpenter (Mr Carpenter) and the then applicant Pete Williams (Mr Williams) against the respondent, The Owners - Strata Plan No 5165 (OSP5165), for interim orders under the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) (SSM Act) (the interim application) was dismissed.
-
On 21 August 2024, OSP5165 made an application for its costs of preparing for and attending the hearing of the interim application (the OSP5165 costs application).
-
I have decided that the OSP5165 costs application should be dismissed.
The hearing on the papers
-
On 16 August 2024, I relevantly made the following orders together with procedural orders in respect of any application for costs by OSP5165 (the 16 August 2024 orders):
“…
2 By consent, leave…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Gates v The Owners - Strata Plan No 5165 and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2024] NSWCATCD 53
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue the court had to address was whether the defendant was entitled to costs following the withdrawal of the interim application by the plaintiff. The court considered the principles governing costs applications and the circumstances in which a party may be entitled to recover costs from an opposing party. The court had to determine whether the defendant's costs application should be dismissed, and if so, whether the applicants and the defendant should bear their own costs of the interim application.
In delivering the decision, the tribunal emphasised that the principles governing costs in the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales are consistent with those in other superior courts. The tribunal noted that where an application is withdrawn without a hearing on the merits, the applicant is generally not entitled to costs unless there are exceptional circumstances justifying an award of costs. The tribunal found that no such exceptional circumstances existed in this case. Consequently, the tribunal dismissed the defendant's costs application and ordered that each party was to bear their own costs of the interim application.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) The costs application of the respondent is dismissed.
(2) Each of the applicants and the respondent are to pay their costs of the interim application.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.