FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| GARRISON & DOWNEY & ANOR | [2019] FCCA 719 |
| Catchwords: CHILD SUPPORT – Application for departure order for period greater than eighteen months – insufficient evidence provided by Applicant – Application in relation to child support dismissed. |
| Legislation: Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989(Cth), ss.111, 111(1), 112, 112(1), 112(4), 112(5), 116, 117, 117(2), 117(2)(c), 118 Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988 (Cth), s.72Q |
| Cases cited: Bauer & Becker [2009] FMCAfam 480 Manchester & Manchester [2011] FMCAfam 1215 Yewen & Child Support Registrar & Anor [2014] FCCA 2399 |
| Applicant: | MR GARRISON |
| First Respondent: | MS DOWNEY |
| Second Respondent: | CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR |
| File Number: | BRC 10544 of 2009 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Cassidy |
| Hearing date: | 1 March 2019 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 1 March 2019 |
| Delivered at: | Brisbane |
| Delivered on: | 22 March 2019 |
REPRESENTATION
| For the Applicant: | Self-represented |
| For the First Respondent: | Self-represented |
| Solicitors for the Second Respondent: | Child Support Registrar, Department of Human Services |
ORDERS
THE COURT ORDERS UNTIL FURTHER ORDER:
That the Applicant’s Application in regards to child support, filed 7 September 2018, be dismissed.
That the matter remain adjourned for mention only at 9:30am on 29 March 2019 in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia at Brisbane.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Garrison & Downey & Anor is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT BRISBANE |
BRC 10544 of 2009
| MR GARRISON |
Applicant
And
| MS DOWNEY |
First Respondent
And
| CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
The Applicant father seeks leave under sections 111 and 112 of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (“the Assessment Act”), for the Court to make a departure order for a period greater than eighteen months.
The Applicant sets out in his Initiating Application, filed 7 September 2018, the orders he seeks:
“1. That leave be granted under Section 111 of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 for the court to make an order under Section 118 of the Act for departure from the administrative assessment of child support payable by Mr Garrison to Ms Downey for the children [X] born … 2005 and [Y] born … 2008 (“the Children”) as follows.
2. That for the period from 14 May 2014 to 30 September 2015, the total amount of child support be set equal to the monies already paid for that period, including the value of any non-agency payments credited for that same period, with the effect that no arrears remain payable, no penalties apply, no overpayment is created and the departure prohibition can be lifted.
3. That for the period from the date of this order the annual rate of child support be assessed in the usual way.”
The Applicant, in his Affidavit, at paragraph [10] seeks:
“10. I apply for a stay of collection of child support for the period subject of dispute and lifting of the departure prohibition.”
The First Respondent in her Response, filed 1 November 2018,…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Garrison and Downey and Anor and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2019] FCCA 719
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the applicant had provided sufficient evidence to justify a departure from the child support assessment for a period exceeding eighteen months.
Judge Cassidy dismissed the applicant's application, finding that the evidence presented was insufficient to meet the threshold required for a departure order of that duration. The court applied the principles governing applications for departure orders under the relevant child support legislation, which necessitate a robust evidentiary basis to justify altering a child support assessment for an extended period.
Consequently, the court ordered that the applicant's application be dismissed and adjourned the matter for mention only.
Orders
Orders of the court
THE COURT ORDERS UNTIL FURTHER ORDER:
1.
That the Applicant’s Application in regards to child support, filed 7 September 2018, be dismissed.
2.
That the matter remain adjourned for mention only at 9:30am on 29 March 2019 in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia at Brisbane.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.