Garrison and Downey and Anor

Link copied
Case Copied 19 min read

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

GARRISON & DOWNEY & ANOR [2019] FCCA 719
Catchwords:
CHILD SUPPORT – Application for departure order for period greater than eighteen months – insufficient evidence provided by Applicant – Application in relation to child support dismissed.

Legislation:

Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989(Cth), ss.111, 111(1), 112, 112(1), 112(4),

112(5), 116, 117, 117(2), 117(2)(c), 118

Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988 (Cth), s.72Q

Cases cited:

Bauer & Becker [2009] FMCAfam 480

Manchester & Manchester [2011] FMCAfam 1215

Yewen & Child Support Registrar & Anor [2014] FCCA 2399

Applicant: MR GARRISON
First Respondent: MS DOWNEY
Second Respondent: CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR
File Number: BRC 10544 of 2009
Judgment of: Judge Cassidy
Hearing date: 1 March 2019
Date of Last Submission: 1 March 2019
Delivered at: Brisbane
Delivered on: 22 March 2019

REPRESENTATION

For the Applicant: Self-represented
For the First Respondent: Self-represented
Solicitors for the Second Respondent: Child Support Registrar, Department of Human Services

ORDERS

THE COURT ORDERS UNTIL FURTHER ORDER:

  1. That the Applicant’s Application in regards to child support, filed 7 September 2018, be dismissed.

  2. That the matter remain adjourned for mention only at 9:30am on 29 March 2019 in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia at Brisbane.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Garrison & Downey & Anor is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT
OF AUSTRALIA
AT BRISBANE

BRC 10544 of 2009

MR GARRISON

Applicant

And

MS DOWNEY

First Respondent

And

CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR

Second Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. The Applicant father seeks leave under sections 111 and 112 of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (“the Assessment Act”), for the Court to make a departure order for a period greater than eighteen months.

  2. The Applicant sets out in his Initiating Application, filed 7 September 2018, the orders he seeks:

    “1. That leave be granted under Section 111 of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 for the court to make an order under Section 118 of the Act for departure from the administrative assessment of child support payable by Mr Garrison to Ms Downey for the children [X] born … 2005 and [Y] born … 2008 (“the Children”) as follows.

    2. That for the period from 14 May 2014 to 30 September 2015, the total amount of child support be set equal to the monies already paid for that period, including the value of any non-agency payments credited for that same period, with the effect that no arrears remain payable, no penalties apply, no overpayment is created and the departure prohibition can be lifted.

    3. That for the period from the date of this order the annual rate of child support be assessed in the usual way.”

  3. The Applicant, in his Affidavit, at paragraph [10] seeks:

    “10. I apply for a stay of collection of child support for the period subject of dispute and lifting of the departure prohibition.”

  4. The First Respondent in her Response, filed 1 November 2018,…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Garrison and Downey and Anor and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2019] FCCA 719
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Garrison, sought a departure order from the child support assessment in relation to his child with the respondent, Downey. The application was heard by Judge Cassidy in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the applicant had provided sufficient evidence to justify a departure from the child support assessment for a period exceeding eighteen months.

Judge Cassidy dismissed the applicant's application, finding that the evidence presented was insufficient to meet the threshold required for a departure order of that duration. The court applied the principles governing applications for departure orders under the relevant child support legislation, which necessitate a robust evidentiary basis to justify altering a child support assessment for an extended period.

Consequently, the court ordered that the applicant's application be dismissed and adjourned the matter for mention only.

Orders

Orders of the court

THE COURT ORDERS UNTIL FURTHER ORDER:

1.

That the Applicant’s Application in regards to child support, filed 7 September 2018, be dismissed.

2.

That the matter remain adjourned for mention only at 9:30am on 29 March 2019 in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia at Brisbane.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.