Ganapathy Prakash (Migration)

[2022] AATA 3765

Ganapathy Prakash (Migration) [2022] AATA 3765 (27 October 2022)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Mr Jagdheep Ganapathy Prakash

REPRESENTATIVE:  Mr Srinivasa Reddy Gottam (MARN: 1462748)

CASE NUMBER:  2211607

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2020/1941655

MEMBER:Sheridan Lee

DATE:27 October 2022

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets public interest criterion 4001 for the purposes of cl 408.216 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulation 1994.

Statement made on 27 October 2022 at 4:23 pm

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Temporary Activity (Class GG) visa – Subclass 408 (Temporary Activity) – criminal history statement – AFP national police check provided to tribunal – no disclosable outcomes – decision under review remitted

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 65, 360(2)(a)
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), Schedule 2, cl 408.216, Schedule 4, criterion 4001

statement of decision and reasons

application for review

1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs to refuse to grant the applicant a Temporary Activity (Class GG) visa under s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act). The applicant applied for the visa on 21 July 2020. The delegate refused to grant the visa on 25 July 2022.

2. The delegate made the decision on the basis that evidence of criminal history was not provided as required to satisfy a criterion for the grant of the visa under the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations).

3. The Tribunal received a National Police Check issued to Jagdheep Ganapathy Prakash on 19 August 2022, reporting no disclosable court outcomes. In light of the new evidence received, the Tribunal is satisfied that the criterion is met and has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

4. In reaching its decision the Tribunal did not consider a hearing to be necessary, as it was able to find in favour of the applicant on the basis of the material before it, pursuant to s 360(2)(a) of the Act.

   decision

5. The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets public interest criterion 4001 for the purposes of cl 408.216 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulation 1994.

   Sheridan Lee
   Member