| [2022] FWCA 1825 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Galpern Group Pty Ltd
(AG2022/1698)
TEST
| Electrical contracting industry | |
| COMMISSIONER BISSETT | MELBOURNE, 7 JUNE 2022 |
Application for approval of the Galpern Group Pty Ltd Single Enterprise Agreement 2021
“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)
“173 Notice of employee representational rights
Employer to notify each employee of representational rights
(1) An employer that will be covered by a proposed enterprise agreement that is not a greenfields agreement must take all reasonable steps to give notice of the right to be represented by a bargaining representative to each employee who:
(a) will be covered by the agreement; and
(b) is employed at the notification time for the agreement.
Note: For the content of the notice, see section 174.
Notification time
(2) The notification time for a proposed enterprise agreement is the time when:
(a) the employer agrees to bargain, or initiates bargaining, for the agreement; or
(b) a majority support determination in relation to the agreement comes into operation; or
(c) a scope order in relation to the agreement comes into operation; or
(d) a low paid authorisation in relation to the agreement that specifies the employer comes into operation.
Note: The employer cannot request employees to approve the agreement under section 181 until 21 days after the last notice is given (see subsection 181(2)).
When notice must be given
(3) The employer must give the notice as soon as practicable, and not later than 14 days, after the notification time for the agreement.
Notice need not be given in certain circumstances
(4) An employer is not required to give a notice to an employee under subsection (1) in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement if the employer has already given the employee a notice under that subsection within a reasonable period before the notification time for the agreement.
How notices are given
(5) The regulations may prescribe how notices under subsection (1) may be given.”
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE516162 PR742311>
- AGLC
- Galpern Group Pty Ltd [2022] FWCA 1825
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 1825
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court needed to assess whether the agreement contained all the mandatory terms prescribed by the Fair Work Act, including minimum wages and conditions, and whether it had been made in good faith and not under duress. The court also had to determine if the agreement had been negotiated in a manner consistent with the principles of representational fairness and good faith bargaining. Furthermore, the court had to consider if the agreement was in the best interests of the employees it was intended to cover.
The Fair Work Commission found that the Galpern Group Pty Ltd Single Enterprise Agreement 2021 included all the mandatory terms required by the Fair Work Act. The court concluded that the agreement had been made in good faith and that the negotiation process adhered to the principles of representational fairness and good faith bargaining. The commission determined that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees it covered, taking into account their needs and the overall business context. As a result, the Fair Work Commission approved the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.