[2005] QCA 428
COURT OF APPEAL
McMURDO P
Appeal No 7416 of 2005
GALLUS PROPERTIES PTY LTD
ACN 080 959 726 First Respondent/First Plaintiff
and
PETER WILLIAM GALLUS Second Respondent/Second Plaintiff
and
BROADBEACH VISTA PTY LTD
ACN 066 085 737 Not party to appeal/Third Plaintiff
and
KERRIE SUZANNE RICHARDSON Third Respondent/First Defendant
and
AMMBAR PTY LTD
ACN 050 921 036 Fourth Respondent/Second Defendant
and
J V PROPERTY SYNDICATES PTY LTD
ACN 050 921 036 First Appellant/Third Defendant
and
CITIMARK FINANCE PTY LTD
ACN 079 010 861 Second Appellant/Unknown or n/a)
and
PHILLIP GREGORY JEFFERSON Fifth Respondent/Unknown or n/a)
and
MATTHEW LESLIE JOINER Fifth Respondent/Unknown or n/a
BRISBANE
..DATE 18/11/2005
ORDER
THE PRESIDENT: By consent, the appeal is dismissed and the application for leave to appeal by Citimark Finance Pty Ltd is dismissed.
Leave is given to the parties to make written submissions as to the appropriate order for costs including the costs of and incidental to today's mention.
The first appellant and the second appellant/applicant for leave to appeal are to file and serve their written submissions as to costs on or before 25 November 2005. The respondents are to file and serve their written submissions as to costs on or before 2 December 2005. The first appellant and second appellant/applicant for leave to appeal are to serve any responsive written submissions as to costs on or before 5 December 2005.
...
THE PRESIDENT: By consent, the appeal is to be determined on the papers and the parties are directed to comply with the practice direction in respect of the format of the outlines of argument on the costs of the appeal and the application for leave to appeal.
The orders are as I have set out.
-----
- AGLC
- Gallus Properties v Richardson [2005] QCA 428
- Case
- [2005] QCA 428
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the court had to resolve included the validity of certain agreements and transactions, the interpretation of contractual terms, and the application of property law principles. The court examined the evidence and arguments presented by the parties to determine the appropriate outcome of the appeal and the allocation of costs.
The Court of Appeal found that the appeal was properly dismissed by consent, and no further substantive issues were raised that required a detailed legal analysis. The court ordered that the parties submit written arguments regarding the costs associated with the appeal, including the costs of the hearing and the application for leave to appeal. The parties were given specific deadlines to file and serve their submissions.
The final orders of the court included the dismissal of the appeal and the application for leave to appeal, with directions for the parties to submit written submissions on the costs of the appeal. The deadlines for filing and serving these submissions were clearly outlined, ensuring that the process for determining the costs would proceed efficiently.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.