Administrative Appeals Tribunal
DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2008] AATA 127
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL )
) No 2007/4898 & 2008/0002
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION ) Re SEAN GALLAGHER Applicant
And
AUSTRALIAN ELECTORAL COMMISSION
Respondent
DECISION
Tribunal Senior Member M D Allen Date8 February 2008
PlaceSydney
Decision For the reasons given orally at the conclusion of the hearing in these matters, the Decisions under review are AFFIRMED. ..................[sgd]......................
M D Allen
Senior Member
CATCHWORDS
ENROLEMENT OBJECTION – review of decisions made by respondent of objections made by applicant to enrolment of three electors who did not reside at the addresses provided to respondent as their places of abode – factual matrix surrounding decision under review at time decision was made – intention of elector at time decision was made – supervening events altering that intention – assertion that certain facts exist is no evidence of the existence of those facts – electors stated temporarily absent from normal place of abode because of renovations – renovations delayed – absence of any evidence to the contrary – decisions under review affirmed
LEGISLATION
Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 sections 114(4) and 117
CASE LAW
Shi v Migration Agents Registration Authority [2005] AATA 904
REASONS FOR DECISION
8 February 2008 Senior Member M D Allen
1. At the conclusion of the hearing of the above matter the terms of the decision intended to be made and the reasons therefor were stated orally. After service upon the Respondent of a copy of the decision that was in fact made, the Respondent pursuant to Sub‑section 43(2A) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 requested the Tribunal to furnish to the Respondent statement in writing of the reasons of the Tribunal for its decision.
2. The oral reasons for decision have been transcribed by Auscript, the Commonwealth Reporting Service. Whereas those oral reasons may reflect the inelegance of an extempore decision, they are in fact the reasons for the said decision.
3. The said transcript is annexed hereunto and furnished to the Applicant and to the Respondent as it is the reasons for the Tribunal's decision.
I certify that this and the preceding page are a true copy of the decision and reasons for decision herein of:
Senior Member M D Allen
Signed: [sgd] Mwela Kapapa
.................................................Associate
Date of Hearing 8 February 2008
Date of Decision 8 February 2008
Solicitor for the Applicant Self-represented
Solicitor for the Respondent Australian Electoral Commission, Legal Services Branch
EXTRACT OF TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS [11:13 am]
MR ALLEN: There are before me this morning two applications to review decisions of the Australian Electoral Office from State Manager for the Australian Electoral Commission for the State of New South Wales. The proceedings arise out of objections made by the Applicant to the enrolment of three electors residing in Sydney’s eastern suburbs. Basically, the Applicant alleged to the Respondent, initially to the divisional returning officer of the applicable electorate, that the persons concerned did not live at the addresses which they had…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Gallagher and Australian Electoral Commission and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2008] AATA 127
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court needed to determine whether the Commission's decisions were correct. The central issue was whether the electors resided at the addresses they provided. This involved examining the factual matrix surrounding the decision at the time it was made, the intention of the elector at that time, and any supervening events that altered that intention. The court also considered whether an assertion that certain facts exist constitutes evidence of the existence of those facts.
The court found that the electors were temporarily absent from their normal place of abode due to renovations, but these renovations were delayed. The applicant provided no evidence to the contrary, and the court was satisfied that the decisions under review were correct. The court affirmed the Commission's decisions, concluding that the applicants had not demonstrated any error in the Commission's assessment of the electors' residency.
The court affirmed the decisions under review, finding no error in the Commission's assessment of the electors' residency. The court emphasised that the applicants had not provided any evidence to contradict the electors' statements regarding their temporary absence due to renovations. The decisions of the Commission were upheld, and the objections to the enrolment of the three electors were sustained.
Orders
Orders of the court
For the reasons given orally at the conclusion of the hearing in these matters, the Decisions under review are AFFIRMED.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.