| [2015] FWCA 1091 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
GAL (WA) Pty Ltd
(AG2015/1585)
GAL (WA) PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT KOVACIC | MELBOURNE, 16 FEBRUARY 2015 |
Application for approval of the GAL (WA) Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the GAL (WA) Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by GAL (WA) Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] Subject to concerns that have been addressed by way of undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] As noted, pursuant to s.190(3), I have accepted undertakings from GAL (WA) Pty Ltd. In accordance with s.191(1) of the Act the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the undertakings are attached to this decision.
[4] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 23 February 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 16 February 2019.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE412630 PR561067>
ATTACHMENT A
- AGLC
- GAL (WA) Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 1091
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 1091
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission were primarily concerned with whether the provisions of the Enterprise Agreement were consistent with the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission had to determine if the agreement complied with the procedural requirements for certification, if it contained terms that were contrary to the objectives of the Act, and whether it provided adequate protections for employees. The central issue was whether the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms for employees, considering the broader economic and employment context.
The Commission examined the agreement clause by clause, considering the evidence presented by both parties. It noted that the agreement had been negotiated in good faith and that the union had provided adequate representation for the employees. The Commission concluded that the agreement met the procedural requirements for certification and did not contain any terms that were contrary to the objectives of the Act. While acknowledging some concerns raised by the union, the Commission found that the overall provisions of the agreement were fair and reasonable, taking into account the specific circumstances of the workplace and the broader economic environment. Consequently, the Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement, affirming its compliance with the relevant statutory provisions.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.