Gaillard, Gitsadawan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs

Case

[1983] FCA 419

31 Mar 1983

No judgment structure available for this case.

,

/

CATCHWORDS

/

Immigration

a n d

A l i e n s

-

c a n c e l l a t l o n of

Temporary

Ent ry

Permlt -

p r o h l b l t e d

l m m l g r a n t

-

d e p o r t a t l o n

-

w h e t h e r

c o m p l l a n c e

w l t h

p r l n c i p l e s

o f

n a t u r a l

j u s t l c e

r e q u l r e d

-

meanlng

o f

" a b s o l u t e

d l s c r e t i o n "

e

M l g r a t i o n

Act

1 9 5 8

( C t h ) ,

s s . 7 ( 1 ) ,

18

A d m i n l s t r a t i v e

D e c l s i o n s

( J u d i c i a l

Review)

-

Act

1 9 7 7

( C t h ) ,

s . 5

Human

Rlghts

Commiss ion

Act

1 9 8 1

( C t h )

S a l e m i v

Mackellar

NO.^),

( 1 9 7 7 )

1 3 7

C L R

396

The Queen Heat ley v Tasmanlan

v

MacKellar;

Ex

p a r t e

R a t u ,

( 1 9 7 7 )

1 3 7

C L R

461

Racing

and

Gamlng

Commlssion,

(1977)

137

C L R

487

M l n l s t e r

f o r

I m m l g r a t i o n

a n d

E t h n i c

A f f a l r s

v

Raj-Ismall ,

40

ALR

3 4 1

Schmldt v

S e c r e t a r y of

S t a t e f o r Home

A f f a l r s ,

[ l 9691

2

Ch

149

Cinnamond

v

B r l t i s h A l rpo r t s

A u t h o r l t y ,

[ l 9 8 0 1

2

A l l ER

368

e

GITSP.DAWAN

G A I L L A R D v

MINISTER

FOR

IMMIGRATION

AND ETHNIC AFFAIRS

~

No.

ACT G . l of 1 9 8 3

Davies ,

J

Melbourne

31

March

1983

I N THE FEDERAL COURT OF

AUSTRALIA

) )

AUSTRALIAN

CAPITAL

TERRITORY

)

DISTRICT REGISTRY

)

No. ACT G . l of 1983

)

GENERAL DIVISION

)

BETWEEN :

GITSADAWAN GAILLARD

A p p l l c a n t

-

AND :

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION

AND ETHNIC AFFAIRS

Respondent

O R D E R

J U D G E MAKING

ORDER

Davies ,

J

a

DATE OF ORDER

31

March

1983

-

WHERE MADE

Melbourne

T H E COURT

ORDERS

1.

T h a t

t h e Honourable

d e c i s i o n

o f

The

J . C .

Hodges,

MP,

t h e n

M i n i s t e r

o Af fa i r s ,

f

S t a t e

f o r

I m m l g r a t i o n

and E thn lc J a n u a r y

made

on t e m p o r a r y

10

1 9 8 3

t h a t

t h e

e n t r y

p e r m i t

h e l d

b y

G l t s a d a w a n

Pot lkum

be

cance l led

be

and

t h e

same

i s

h e r e b y

5e t

a s i d e .

2.

T h a t

t h e

d e c i s l o n

o f

The

Honourable

J . C .

Hodges,

MP,

t h e n

M l n i s t e r

o A f f a i r s ,

f

S t a t e

for

Immigra t ion

a n d E t h n l c J a n u a r y

made

on

1 0

1 9 8 3

t h a t

G i t s a d a w a n

P o t 1 k u m

d e p o r t e d

b e

f r o m

A u s t r a l l a

b e

a n d

t h e

s a m e

IS

h e r e b y

s e t

a s i d e .

3 .

T h a t

t h e

r e s p o n d e n t

p a y

t h e

applrcan

t ' s

c o s t s

o f

t h i s

a p p l i c a t i o n

to

be

a g r e e d

o r

t a x e d .

4 .

That ' l l b e r t y

be

reserved

to

t h e

p a r t i e s

t o

a p p l y

€or

a n y

f u r t h e r

o r

other

order

a s may

seem

meet.

. ,

,

,”.

/

,I

I N THE

FEDERAL COURT

OF A U S T R A L I A

)

)

AUSTRALIAN

CAPITAL

TERRITORY

)

DISTRICT REGISTRY

1

No.

ACT G . l of

1983

GENERAL

D I V I S I O N

BETWEEN :

GITSADAWAN

GAILLARD

Appl ican t

-

AND :

MINISTER

FOR

I M M I G R A T I O N

AND ETHNIC AFFAIRS

Respondent

REASONS

FOR

JUDGMENT

CORAN : DAVIES, J

e

7

A p r i l

1 9 8 3

T h i s i s (Judicial Review) Act

a n a p p l l c a t i o n u n d e r

s.5

o f

I

t h e A d m i n i s t r a t i v e D e c l s i o n s

1 9 7 7 t o

r e v i e w

two

d e c i s i o n s

made

on

1 0

Janua ry

1983

by

The Honourable J . C .

Hodges,

MP,

t h e n Minister

o f

S t a t e

f o r

I m m i g r a t l o n

a n d

E t h n l c

A f f a i r s .

The

f i r s t

d e c i s i o n

was

a

d e c i s i o n

u n d e r

s.7(1)

o f

t h e

M i q r a t l o n

Act

1 9 5 8

t h a t

a

t e m p o r a r y

e n t r y

p e r m i t

t h e n

h e l d

b y

t h e

a p p l i c a n t

be

c a n c e l l e d

a n d t h c d e c i s i o n s t h e a p p l i c a n t

s e c o n d

t h a t

s h e

b e

d e p o r t e d

f r o m

A u s t r a l i a .

I n

t h e

was

ca l l ed

G i t sadawan

Po t ikum.

2.

T h e

a p p l l c a t l o n

f l l e d

i n

t h i s

Court

r a l s e d

a

number

o f

g r o u n d s

b u t

t h e

o n l y

g r o u n d

p u r s u e d

a t

t h e

h e a r i n g

w

a

s

t h a t ,

I n

m a k l n g

h l s d e c i s l o n s , n a t u r a l

t h e

M l n l s t e r

d i d

n o t

o b s e r v e

t h e

p r i n c l p l e s

o f

j u s t i c e ,

t h a t

h e

d i d

n o t

g l v e

t o c a n c e l l a t l o n

t h e

a p p l l c a n t

a d e q u a t e

n o t l c e

o f

h l s

l n t e n t l o n

t o

c o n s l d e r

t h e

of

h e r

e n t r y

p e r m l t

a n d

h e r

d e p o r t a t i o n

f r o m A u s t r a l l a

a n d

t h a t ,

b e f o r e o p p o r t u n l t y

m a k i n g

h i s

d e c l s l o n s ,

h

e

d l d

n o t

g l v e

her

a n

a d e q u a t e

t o

b

e

h e a r d o n

t h e s e

mat ters .

!)

a

The

a p p l i c a n t ,

who

was

t h e n

Gi t sadawan

P o t i k u m ,

a p p l i e d

I n

1 9 7 8

f o r a acknowledgement

t e m p o r a r y

e n t r y

p e r m l t

a n d ,

o n

27

O c t o b e r

1 9 7 8 ,

s i g n e d

a n

whlch " I , MISS GITSADAWAN

in

,

I ts

h g l l s h form,

r e a d

:

POTIKUM

h e r e b y

a c k n o w l e d g e ,

1 n

r e l a t i o n

t o

my

engagemen t

In

t h e

h o u s e h o l d

I n

A u s t r a l l a

o f

MRS

( X ) ,

ATTACHE

t h a t

my

t e m p o r a r y

e n t r y

a n d

s t a y

I n

A u s t r a l i a

h a v e

b e e n

a p p r o v e d

b y

t h e

A u s t r a l i a n

G o v e r n m e n t

o n

t h e

s t r i c t

c o n d i t i o n

t h a t :

( a )

I

w i l l b e h o u s e h o l d

e m p l o y e d

o n

d o m e s t l c

d u t l e s

i n

t h e

o f

MRS

( X ) ,

ATTACHE

(b) I have

been

made

aware

I n

w r l t l n g

b y c o n d i t l o n s

o r

o n

b e h a l f o f of my employment i n

MRS

( X ) ,

ATTACHE

o f

t h e

h l s / h e r

h o u s e h o l d

a n d

I

h a v e

f u l l y

u n d e r s t o o d

a n d

h a v e

a c c e p t e d

t h o s e

c o n d l t i o n s ;

( c )

I

u n d e r t a k e

t o

d e p a r t

from

A u s t r a l i a

~n

a c c o r d a n c e

w l t h

t h e

t r a v e l

a r r a n g e m e n t s

m

a

d

e

f o r me

by or on

beha l f

o f

my

d i p l o m a t i c

or

c o n s u l a r

e m p l o y e r

u p o n

t h e

c e s s a t i o n

o f

my

employment

in

h l s /her

household ,

whether

upon

t h e t e r m i n a t i o n o f h l s / h e r o f f i c i a l p o s t i n g t o

A u s t r a l i a

o r

t h r o u g h

cessation

o f

my

e m p l o y m e n t

f o r

o t h e r

r e a s o n s ;

( d )

I

w i l l n o t

b e

e l l g l b l e

t o

r e m a i n

I n

A u s t r a l l a

a s

a

r e s l d e n t o r I n a n y o t h e r c a p a c i t y . "

I have used "Mrs X "

f o r

t h e

name

of

t h e

a t t a c h e

a n d

will

c o n t l n u e

t o do

s o h e r e a f t e r .

A

t e m p o r a r y

e n t r y

p e r m l t ,

v a l i d

fo r

t w e l v e

m o n t h s ,

was

g r a n t e d

t o

t h e

a p p l l c a n t

a n d

s h e

a r r i v e d

i n

A u s t r a l i a

o n

5

J a n u a r y

1 9 7 9 .

.

I .

,'

3 .

She

commenced

t o

l i v e ,

a n d

w o r k ,

a t

a n

e m b a s s y

i n

C a n b e r r a .

S u b s e q u e n t

e n t r y

p e r m i t s

were

i s s u e d

w l t h

a

v a l i d l t y

o f

t w e l v e

months

each.

The

l a s t

e n t r y

p e r m i t

e x p l r e d

o n

30

J a n u a r y

1 9 8 3 .

A t

t h e

e n d

o f

J u l y

1 9 8 2 ,

t h e

a p p l l c a n t

m a r r l e d

Mr

Robert

Andre

G a i l l a r d

and

l e f t

t h e

embassy.

Some

o f

t h e

s u b s e q u e n t

e v e n t s

may be December

g leaned

f rom

a

s u b m i s s i o n ,

p u t o f f l c e r

t o

. t h e

M i n l s t e r

o n

2 3

1982

by

Mr A f f a i r s ,

A.E .

F a u b e l ,

a n

o f

t h e

D e p a r t m e n t

a

f

1

0

I m m i g r a t i o n

a n d

E t h n i c

w h i c h

r e c o r d e d ,

" 4

On

28.7.82

Mrs

( X ) ,

A t t a c h e ,

...

Embassy,

C a n b e r r a ,

c o n t a c t e d

t h e e m p l o y .

D e p a r t m e n t

o f

F o r e i g n

A f f a l r s .

S h e

w a s

w o r r l e d

t h a t

MS

Pot lkum

was

p l a n n l n g

t o

a b s c o n d r e m o v e d

f r o m

h e r

MS

Pot lkum

h a d a p p a r e n t l y b e l o n g i n g s

m o s t

o f

h c r

p e r s o n a l

f r o m

t h e

r e s i d e n c e

a n d

l n f o r m a t l o n

h a d

come

t o

t h e

n o t i c e

o f

Mrs

( X )

t h a t MS

Potlkum

had

d e v i s e d

a

p l a n ,

w l t h

t h e

h e l p

o f

a

T h a l

p e r s o n ,

t o

e n t e r i n t o A u s t r a l i a n c i t l z e n .

a

m a r r l a g e

o f

c o n v e n i e n c e

w l t h

a n

5

T h e

F o r e i g n a c t i o n

A f f a i r s

o f f l c e r

l n f o r m e d

Mrs

( X )

t h a t n o P o t l k u m

f o r m a l r e m a l n e d

c o u l d

b e

t a k e n

w h l l e

MS

a

d o m e s t l c

s e r v a n t

~n

t h e

r e s l d e n c e .

I t

was

s u g g e s t e d

t o

Mrs

(X) t h a t

s h e

m l g h t

c o u n s e l

MS

P o t l k u m

t o

l e a v e

A u s t r a l l a

v o l u n t a r l l y

r a t h e r

t h a n

a b s c o n d l n g

a n d

f a c l n g

t h e

p o s s l b l e

c o n s e q u e n c e s .

6

On

2.8.82

Mrs p r e s e n t e d

( X )

c a l l e d

a t t h e

Depar tmen t

o f

F o r e i g n

A f f a i r s

a n d

a

f o r m a l

.. .

E-nbassy

N o t e

w h l c h 'Mlss

s t a t e d Gl t sadawan

t h a t

:

has

r u n away from Mrs

(X)'s

r e s l d e n c e o n T h u r s d a y

29

J u l y

1 9 8 2 . '

7

On

23.8.82

t h e

Department

of

F o r e i g n

Affa i r s

r e c e i v e d

a

f u r t h e r

f o r m a l

n o t e

f r o m

t h e c a n c e l l a t l o n

...

Embassy.

T h e

E m b a s s y

s o u g h t

t h e

o f

MS

P o t l k u r n ' s

a u t h o r i t y

t o

r e m a l n

i n

A u s t r a l i a

a n d

t h a t

s h e

be

d i r e c t e d

t o

l e a v e

A u s t r a l l a

q u i c k l y .

8

Mrs

( X )

(... A t t a c h e )

c a l l e d

a t

t h e

ACT

Reg iona l

Of f l ce

on

6 .10 .82 .

She

was

accompanied

by

a

MS

....

The

l a d l e s

p r o v i d e d

f o l l o w i n g

t h e

i n f o r m a t l o n

:

MS

P o t l k u m

1s

r o m a n t i c a l l y

a t t a c h e d

t o

Mr

S a n c h a i

I s r a b h a d k l

who

h a s

p r o v l d e d

h e r

w l t h

accommodation

and

employment;

r

I

4 .

Mr

I s r a b h a d k l ,

who

came

t o Austral ia

20

y e a r s

a g o

a s

t h e

a d o p t e d

s o n

o f

a

( f o r m e r )

T h a i

Ambassador,

i s

c u r r e n t l y

i n v o l v e d

w l t h

t h r e e

l a d i e s :

MS

.. . (who

has

3

c h i l d r e n

b y

h i m ) ,

Mrs

... and MS Potlkurn.

Mr

I s r a b h a d k i owns 4

t a x i s ,

a

h o u s e

i n

C a n b e r r a

a n d

i s a

p a r t owner

o f

t h e

T h a l

R e s t a u r a n t

i n

P h l l l i p ,

ACT;

Mr

I s r a b h a d k i

a r r a n g e d

t h e

m a r r i a g e

o f

MS

P o t i k u m

t o

Mr

G a l l l a r d ,

a

n

A u s t r a l l a n

c l t i z e n ,

on

31.7.82.

Mr

G a l l l a r d , who

i s employed

by

Mr

I s r a b h a d k l

a s

a t a x i

d r i v e r ,

d o e s

n o t

l i v e

I a

w l t h

MS

Potikum.

M r

I s r a b h a d k l

a r r a n g e d

t h e

m a r r i a g e

s o

t h a t

MS

P o t i k u m

c o u l d

r e m a i n

I n

A u s t r a l i a

t o be

one

o f

h i s l o v e r s .

I n

c o n c l u s i o n ,

Mrs

( X ) g i v e n

and

MS

. . .

s ta ted

MS

P o t i k u m ' s

a c t l o n s

h a v e

a

b a d

r e p u t a t i o n

t o

T h a i ' s

g e n e r a l l y

and

p a r t i c u l a r l y

t h o s e

T h a i

n a t i o n a l s

who

a r e

e m p l o y e d

b y see MS Potikum

d l p l o m a t s

as

d o m e s t i c

s t a f f .

The

l a d i e s

s a i d

t h a t

t h e

. . .

Ambassador

would

l i k e

t o

d e p o r t e d .

R e p r e s e n t a t l o n s f r o m

. . .

Embassy

9

Mrs

( X ) ,

Attache w i t h

t h e

B n b a s s y

o f

... ,

s t a t e d

I n

h e r

l e t t e r

d a t e d

1 7 . 1 1 . 8 2 ,

a t t a c h e d

a t

a n n e x

'B',

t h a t MS

P o t i k u m

absconded

f rom

her

employ

and

e n t e r e d

I n t o

a

non

bona

f i d e

m a r r l a g e

w i t h

a n

A u s t r a l i a n

c i t i z e n .

Mrs

( X ) ,

a n d

also

MS

P o t i k u m ' s

f a m i l y

i n

T h a l l a n d

a r e

c o n c e r n e d

a b o u t

t h e

p r o s p e c t

o f

MS

P o t i k u m

r e m a l n i n g

i n

Australia

n o t

t o

p u r s u e

a

m a r r l a g e ,

b u t

t o

m a l n t a i n

a

d e

f a c t o

r e l a t i o n s h i p

w i t h

a

b o y f r i e n d

who

a b u s e s

A u s t r a l i a n

laws

f o r

h i s

own

p u r p o s e .

I n t e r v i e w

w i t h

MS

P o t i k u m -

10

MS

Pot ikum

responded

t o

a

r e q u e s t

t o

c a l l

a t

t h e

ACT

Reg iona l

OfZ ice

and

was

i n t e r v l e w e d

o n

2 .12 .82 .

She

p rovided

t h e

f o l l o w l n g

i n f o r m a t l o n

:

her

p a r e n t s

a r e

d e c e a s e d .

I n

T h a l l a n d

s h e

h a s

two

s i s t e r s

a n d

a

h a l f - b r o t h e r .

s h e m a r r i e d l o c a l

I n c u s t o m s ,

T h a l l a n d

i n

a c c o r d a n c e

w l t h

i n

t h a t

s h e

c l a i m s

s h e

m a r r i e d

' w l t h o u t

c e r t l f i c a t e '

a n d

t h e r e f o r e

c a n

b e

d i v o r c e d

' w i t h o u t

c e r t l f i c a t e '

a c c o r d i n g

t o

l o c a l

c u s t o m .

S h e

was

t h e n

1 8 y e a r s

o f

a g e

a n d t h e r e d a u g h t e r

was

a

d a u g h t e r ( A c c o r d i n g

of

t h e

u n i o n .

Her

i s

now

5

y e a r s

o f

a g e

a n d

is

i n

t h e

c a r e

o f

t h e

f a t h e r

i n

T h a i l a n d .

5.

t o

t h e

A C T

R e g l s t r a r

o f

M a r r l a g e s ,

w h o s e

o f f i c e

h a s

b e e n

p r o v i d e d

w i t h

d e t a i l s

o f

s t a t e m e n t s

r e l a t i n g

t o

t h e

m a r r i a g e ,

MS

P o t i k u m

r e c o r d e d

h e r

s t a t u s

a s

' s p i n s t e r '

a t

t h e time

o f employment

m a r r i a g e ) .

Durlng

her

wlth

Mrs

( X ) ,

t h e

.. .

A t t a c h e ,

s h e

was

p o o r l y

p a i d

( $ 2 0 - 4 0

P .w . )

and

f r e e d o m

h e r

was

r e s t r i c t e d .

h a d

S h e

d i s a g r e e m e n t s

w i t h

Mrs

( X )

o v e r

m i n o r

m a t t e r s

and

Mrs

( X )

was

j e a l o u s

o f

h e r

when

s h e s a id

s h e had

a

boyf r i end

and

cou ld

mar ry

him

and

be

-

a l l o w e d

t o

r e m a l n

here.

She

met

Mr

Ga i l l a rd

be tween

Sep tember

and

December

1981

and

t h e l r

r e l a t i o n s h i p

d e v e l o p e d

i n March

1982.

She

marrled

Mr

G a l l l a r d

o n

2 9

o r

30

J u l y

1 9 8 2

( s h e

was

u n s u r e

of

t h e e x a c t

d a t e ) .

T h e y

d i d

n o t

h a v e

a

honeymoon.

He

n e v e r

t o o k

h e r

o u t .

She

does

n o t

l i v e

w l t h

Mr

G a l l l a r d

b e c a u s e

t h e y

d

o

n o t

know

e a c h

o t h e r

well.

( From MS

P o t l k u m ' s

s t a t e m e n t s

It

a p p e a r s

t h a t

s h e

h a s G a i l l a r d

n e v e r

l l v e d

w l t h

Mr

G a i l l a r d ) .

Mr

l l v e s

w l t h

f r l e n d s

( i n

a

g r o u p

h o u s e ) .

He

h a s

a

d o g

w h l c h

c a n n o t

b e

k e p t

i n

a

f l a t .

Mr

G a l l l a r d

v i s i t s

h e r

o c c a s i o n a l l y .

She works a t

t h e

T h a i

R e s t a u r a n t

o n

3

n i g h t s

e a c h week

and

a t

S u d a ' s

G l f t

S h o p

3

d a y s

p e r

week.

Her

t o t a l

w e e k l y

i n c o m e

1 s

$135

and

s h e h a s S o c l e t y .

s a v i n g s

o f

a b o u t

$ 5 , 0 0 0

I n

a

B u l l d l n g

S h e

d o e s

n o t

I n t e n d

t o

l e a v e

Aus t r a l i a

b e f o r e

t h e

e x p i r y

o f

h e r

t e m p o r a r y

e n t r y

p e r m l t

o n r e a s o n s

30.1.83.

When asked t o

p r o v i d e

why

h e r

t e m p o r a r y

e n t r y

perm1 t

s h o u l d

n o t

be

c a n c e l l e d

a n d

h e r

d e p a r t u r e

e n f o r c e d

M S

P o t l k u m

r e p o r t e d l y

r e s p o n d e d

t o

t h e

e f f e c t

t h a t

e v e n

t h o u g h

s h e

l e f t

Mrs

(X)'s household

and

i s

e n g a g e d

I n

u n a u t h o r i s e d

w o r k m a r r i e d

a t

t h e

g i f t

s h o p

a n d

t h e

r e s t a u r a n t

s h e

h a s

a n

A u s t r a l l a n

and

l o v e s

h l m

a n d

w a n t s

t o

s t a y

w l t h

hlm

h e r e s u g g e s t i o n

I n

A u s t r a l l a .

S h e

d i d

n o t

r e s p o n d

t o

t h e

t h a t

s h e

was

n o t

s t a y i n g

w i t h

hlm

a t A u s t r a l i a

p r e s e n t

n o r

had

she

been

w l t h

h i m .

MS

P o t l k u m

s a l d

s h e

wishes

t o

remain

p e r m a n e n t l y

i n

b e c a u s e

s h e

1s

m a r r i e d

t o

a n some

A u s t r a l l a n

c l t i z e n .

She

added

t h a t ,

a t

time

i n

t h e

f u t u r e

s h e

would

v i s i t

T h a i l a n d t o

see

h e r

d a u g h t e r .

6.

I n t e r v i e w w i t h

Mr

G a i l l a r d

11

Mr

G a l l l a r d

a c c o m p a n i e d

MS

P o t i k u m

t h e

t o

l n t e r v l e w

o n

2 . 1 2 . 8 2

a n d

h e

w a s

l n t e r v i e w e d

s e p a r a t e l y .

He

s a l d

t h a t

h e s o m e t h i n g

m a r r l e d

h e r

b e c a u s e

h e

knew

t h a t

s h e

wou ld

o the rwise

be

r e q u l r e d

t o

l e a v e

A u s t r a l i a

a n d

t h a t

h e

f e l t

f o r

MS

Potikum.

When

Mr

Gal l la rd

was

a s k e d

a b o u t

h l s

c o u r t s h l p

w i t h

MS f u r t h e r

P o t l k u m ,

h

e

s a l d

t h a t

h

e

d l d

n o t

w l s h

t o

a n s w e r

a n y Gai l la rd was

q u e s t l o n s

w l t h o u t

l e g a l

c o u n s e l .

Mr

i n v l t e d

t o

c a l l

a g a l n

t o

t h e

o f f l c e ,

w l t h

a

s o l i c i t o r ,

a t a

l a t e r

d a t e .

1 2

Mr

G a l l l a r d

h a d

I n

f a c t

moved

I n t o new p r e m l s e s

o n

2 9 . 1 1 . 8 2

w l t h o u t

t e l l i n g

MS o f f i c e r s

P o t i k u m

( h l s

w i f e )

o f

h l s

new

a d d r e s s .

D e p a r t m e n t a l

I n v i t e d

him

t o

a t t e n d

t h e

D e p a r t m e n t

a g a i n

o n

3 . 1 2 . 8 2

w i t h

o r

w i t h o u t

a

s o l i c l t o r .

He

came

a l o n e .

Mr

G a l l l a r d

was

c o u n s e l l e d

I n

h l s

own

b e s t

I n t e r e s t s

t h a t

h e

s h o u l d

d e t a i l s u b s e q u e n t

t h e

c i r c u m s t a n c e s

o f

h l s r e l a t i o n s h i p

c o u r t s h i p

a n d

m a r r l a g e .

I t

was

e x p l a l n e d

t o

h l m

t h a t

I f c o n s l d e r

t h e

was

g e n u i n e

t h e n

t h e

D e p a r t m e n t

w l s h e d

t o

t h e

q u e s t i o n

o f

t h e

g r a n t

o f

r e s i d e n c e

t o

MS

Pot ikum.

I t was r e l a t i o n s h l p

a l s o

e x p l a l n e d

t o

Mr

G a i l l a r d

t h a t

I f

t h e

was

n o t g e n u i n e a n d t h e m a r r i a g e

was

a

m a r r l a g e

c o n t r i v e d

s o l e l y

t o

e n a b l e

MS

P o t l k u m

t o

become

e l l g l b l e

f o r

t h e

g r a n t s l l e n t . "

f o r

r e s l d e n t

s t a t u s ,

t h e n h e G a i l l a r d

m i g h t

b e

l l a b l e

t o

p r o s e c u t i o n .

Mr

r e m a i n e d

A s

t o

t h e

i n t e r v l e w

h e l d

o n

2

December

1982 ,

Mr

P.M.

B u t t o n ,

a n

o f f l c e r

I n

t h e

C o n t r o l I m m i g r a t i o n

S e c t l o n

of

t h e

C a n b e r r a

R e g i o n a l

O f f l c e

o

f

t h e

D e p a r t m e n t

o f

a n d

E t h n l c

A f f a l r s ,

h a s

s w o r n

:

" 2 .

On

2

December

1 9 8 2

1 - i n t e r v i e w e d

t h e

a p p l i c a n t

h e r e l n .

P r e s e n t

a t B a n d a h a r a n g s k i

t h e

i n t e r v l e w

was

a

T h a l

i n t e r p r e t e r

P r a m o n d a

t o

a i d

t h e d l f f l c u l t i e s

a p p l i c a n t h a v e u n d e r s t a n d i n g

s h o u l d

s h e

t h e

h g l l s h

l a n g u a g e .

3 .

A t

t h e

commencemen t

o f

t he

l n t e rv i ew

I

asked

t h e

a p p l l c a n t

h e r

name.

She

r e p l l e d

t h a t

h e r

name

was G l t sadawan I n t e r v i e w

Po t lkum.

Dur ing

t he

cour se

o f

t he

I

asked

MS

P o t i k u m

t h a t

now s h e

h a d

l e f t

Mrs

(X)'s employmen t

wha

r ea sons

t

d ld

she

have

now

t o

s t a y

i n

A u s t r a l l a ?

MS

P o t i k u m

r e p l i e d

t h a t

as

s h e had

l e f t Mrs

(X)'s

h o u s e ,

Mrs

( X )

had

n o t h l n g

t o

d o

w l t h

h e r

b e c a u s e

s h e

was

m a r r i e d ,

h a d

a

h u s b a n d

a n d

h a d

t h e

r l g h t

t o

s t a y

h e r e .

4 .

I

a s k e d

MS

Potlkum why

s h e

t h o u g h t

t h a t

t h e

I

,

7.

d e p a r t m e n t

s h o u l d

n o t

c a n c e l

h e r

e n t r y

p e r m i t

w h i c h

e x p i r e d

o n

3 0

J a n u a r y

1 9 8 3

a n d

i f

we

c a n c e l l e d

I t ,

wha t

r ea sons

she

wou ld husband

have

fo r

us

n o t

t o

d e p o r t

h e r .

MS

Potikurn

r e p l i e d

t h a t

s h e

was

marr ied

and

s h e

loved

her

and

had

t h e

r i g h t

t o

s t a y

h e r e .

5.

I a sked MS Pot ikum

whe

the

r

she

was

l n t end lng

t o

l e a v e

A u s t r a l l a

t o

g o

b a c k

t o

T h a l l a n d

when

h e r

e n t r y p e r m i t r e p l i e d t h a t

e x p l r e d s h e i n t e n d e d t o s t a y h e r e

J a n u a r y

3 0

o n

1 9 8 3 .

S h e

b u t

t h a t s h e

may

g o

t o

T h a l l a n d

f o r

a

v l s l t

I n

a

yea r

o r

wha teve r .

6.

I a sked MS Potikum why she

wlshed

t o

s t a y

h e r e

I n

A u s t r a l l a

t o

w h l c h

s h e

r e p l l e d

s h e

w a n t e d

t o

s t a y

h e r e

w i t h

h e r

h u s b a n d

t h a t

s h e

had

work

here

a n d s a v i n g s T h a l l a n d

a n d

t h a t

t h e r e

was

n o t h i n g

l e f t

i n

f o r

h e r . "

The

a p p l i c a n t ' s

e v i d e n c e

as

t o

t h l s

i n t e r v l e w

was

r a the r

less

p r e c l s e .

However,

I am

satisfied

t h a t

t h e

a p p l l c a n t

i s

a

p e r s o n

of

l i m l t e d

u n d e r s t a n d l n g

a n d

h a s

some

d l f f i c u l t y

w i t h

E n g l i s h

l anguage

and

c o n c e p t s .

I

am

s a t i s f l e d

t h a t

t h e

i n t e r v l e w

o f

2

D e c e m b e r

1 9 8 2

d i d

n o t

p r o v l d e

a n

a d e q u a t e

o p p o r t u n l t y

t o

t h e

a p p l l c a n t

t o

p u t

f o r w a r d

a

c a s e

a s

t o

why

h e r

t h e n

c u r r e n t

t e m p o r a r y

e n t r y

p e r m l t

s h o u l d

n o t

b e

c a n c e l l e d

or

a s

t o

why

s h e

s h o u l d n o t Information-gatherlng

b e

d e p o r t e d .

I n d e e d ,

t h e i n t e r v i e w

i n t e r v l e w

w a s

more

o f

a n

t h a n

a n

i n t e r v i e w w h l c h

s o u g h t

t o

g i v e

t o

t h e c o n s l d e r e d

a p p l i c a n t

a

n

a d e q u a t e

k n o w l e d g e

o

f

t h e a d e q u a t e

m a t t e r s

w h l c h

w e r e

b e i n g

a g a i n s t

h e r

a n d

a n

o p p o r t u n l t y

t o

e x p l a i n

t h e m

or

t o p u t

a

c o n t r a r y v i e w .

On 23

December

1982,

Mr

F a u b e l

p u t

t h e

s u b r n l s s l o n

t o

t h e

M l n i s t e r

w h i c h

i n c l u d e d

p a r a g r a p h s

4 - 1 2

s e t

o u t

a b o v e ,

a n d

a l s o

t h e

f o l l o w l n g

:

" 1 4

MS

Potikum was

a d m l t t e d r e m a i n

t o A u s t r a l i a

Aus t ra l la

t o

be

a

d o m e s t i c

I n 3 0 . 1 . 8 3 .

C a n b e r r a

a t

t h e

home

o f

a

.. .

A t t a c h e

and

was

a u t h o r i s e d

t o

i n

f o r

t h a t

p u r p o s e

u n t i l

She

absconded

f rom

her

employment

on

29.7.82

and

married

a n

A u s t r a l l a n

c l t i z e n

3 1 . 7 . 8 2 .

o n

The

c o u p l e

n o t

d o

l i v e

t o g e t h e r

a n d

t h e

s t a t e m e n t s

made

by

b o t h

p a r t i e s

p o i n t s t r o n g l y

t o t h e p r o b a b i l i t y

t h a t

t h e m a r r i a g e

was

c o n t r i v e d

s o l e l y t o e n a b l e

MS

Potikum

t o remaln

il ,.

<'

8.

I n A u s t r a l i a a c t u a l l y m a d e a n a p p l i c a t i o n f o r r e s i d e n t s t a t u s o n

a s

a

r e s i d e n t ,

a l t h o u g h

s h e

h a s

n o t

o f whlch indicates the re may

m a r r i a g e .

I n

a n y

e v e n t

M S

Potikum

t h e

b a s i s

h a s a d m i t t e d m a r r l a g e

t o

a

' h u s b a n d '

a n d

c h i l d

i n

T h a i l a n d

be

a

p o s s l b l l i t y t h a t t h e

t o

Mr

G a i l l a r d

m a y

b e

bigamous.

C e r t a l n l y MS

P o t i k u m makes

it

p l a i n t h a t

s h e

is n o t

a b o u t

t o

l e a v e A u s t r a l i a

v o l u n t a r i l y .

Recommendation

1 5

I n

a l l

t h e

c i r c u m s t a n c e s ,

I

recommend

t h a t

you

s i g n t h e t e m p o r a r y

a t t a c h e d

f o r m

o f

c a n c e l l a t i o n

o f

t h e

e n t r y

p e r m i t

l s s u e d

t o

MS

Potikum

and

t h a t y o u d e p o r t a t l o n t o be

s i g n

t h e

a t t a c h e d

o r d e r

f o r

h e r

invoked

a s

soon

as

p r a c t i c a b l e . "

On

10

J a n u a r y

1983,

t h e M l n i s t e r

a p p r o v e d

t h e

r ecommenda t lon

pu t

t o

him

by

Mr

F a u b e l

a n d

c a n c e l l e d

t h e

t h e n

e x i s t i n g

t e m p o r a r y

e n t r y

p e r m l t

h e l d

b y

t h e

a p p l i c a n t

a n d

o r d e r e d

t h a t

s h e

b e

d e p o r t e d

f r o m

A u s t r a l i a .

For

t h e

p u r p o s e s

o f

t h i s s u r r o u n d i n g

p r o c e e d l n g ,

i t

wou ld

no t

be

y r o p e r

t o

l n v e s t i g a t e

t h e

f a c t s

t h e

a p p l l c a n t ' s

m a r r l a g e

or

t o

d e t e r m i n e

w h e t h e r

i t

was

v a l i d

or

l n v a l l d ,

c o n t r i v e d

or

g e n u i n e .

0

T h i s

1s

a

p r o c e e d i n g

b y

way

o f

j u d l c l a l

r e v i e w

a n d

t h e

p r l n c l p a l

issue

1s

w h e t h e r ,

b e f o r e

c o m i n g

t o

h l s

d e c l s i o n s ,

t h e

M l n l s t e r

s h o u l d

h a v e

g i v e n

t o

t h e

applicant

n o t i c e

o f

t h e

mat te rs

which

would

be

c o n s i d e r e d

a g a l n s t

h e r

a n d

a

f a i r

o p p o r t u n l t y

t o

p u t

s u b m l s s l o n s

r e s p e c t i n g

t h e

c a n c e l l l n g

o f

t h e

e n t r y

permlt

and

-

r e s p e c t i n g

h e r

d e p o r t a t l o n .

I n S a l e m i pp . 419-420

v

Macke l l a r

(No.2) (1977) 137 C L R

396,

Gibbs

J

s a l d ,

a t

:

"There

i s

n o t h i n g

t e c h n i c a l

a b o u t

t h e

p r i n c l p l e s

o f

n a t u r a l

j u s t i c e .

I t

1 s

s o m e t i m e s

s a i d ,

o r

s u g g e s t e d ,

t h a t

t h o s e

p r l n c l p l e s

a p p l y

o n l y

t o q u a s i - ~ u d l c i a l ,

p r o c e e d i n g s

w h i c h

a r e

j u d l c i a l

o r

o r w h e r e s t a t e t h e r u l e I n t h a t

t h e r e

i s

a

d u t y

t o

a c t

~ u d i c i a l l y .

To

way

seems

t o me

t o b e u n d u l y

r e s t r l c t i v e

a n d

m l s l e a d i n g .

I t

i s

a t

l e a s t

c l e a r

t h a t when

t h e power

whlch

1s

b e i n g

exercised

i s

a

s t a t u t o r y

o n e ,

i t

is

n o t

n e c e s s a r y

t o

be

a b l e

t o

f i n d

i n

t h e

w o r d s

o f

t h e

s t a t u t e

i t s e l f

a

d u t y

t o

I

I .

,

9.

h e a r t h e ~ u d i c i a l l v .

p a r t y i y l e s J i n CooPSr G

a f f e c t e d

o r

o t h e r w l s e

t o

a c t

T o

reDeat

t h e

wel l -known

words

of

~

~~~

~

W a n d s w o r t h

B o a r d

o f

Works,

( 1 8 6 3 )

1 4

C q i % ) - 1 8 0

a t

p.194

1143

ER

4 1 4

a t

p . 4 2 0 1 ,

' a l t h o u g h

t h e r e

a r e

n o

p o s i t l v e

w o r d s

i n h e a r d ,

a

s t a t u t e

r e q u l r l n g

t h a t

t h e

p a r t y common

s h a l l

b e

y e t t h e o m l s s i o n

l u s t l c e

o f

t h e

law

will

s u p p l y

t h e

o f

t h e

l e g l s l a t u r e ' .

A s Lord

Reid s a l d

i n Rldge v

Baldwln ,

[ l 9 6 4 1 AC

4 0 a t

p . 7 6 ,

~t may bc

p o s s i b l e

' t o

I n f e r

a

l u d i c l a l

e l e m e n t

f r o m

t h e

n a t u r e

o f

t h e

p o w e r '

i n

t h e

c a s e .

F u r t h e r ,

t h e

a p p l i c a t l o n

o f p o w e r

t h e

p r l n c i p l e s

i s

n o t

l i m l t e d

t o

cases

w h e r e

t h e

t h a t

i s

e x e r c i s e d

a f f e c t s

r i g h t s

I n

t h e

s t r i c t

s e n s e

:

s e e ,

e g ,

B a n k s

v

T r a n s p o r t

R e g u l a t i o n

B o a r d

( V l c t ) ,

( 1 9 6 8 )

1 1 9

CLR

222.

I t may be

enough

i f

a n

i n t e r e s t

o r

p r l v i l e g e

i s

a f f e c t e d , - o r ,

as

Lord d e p r l v e

Dennlng

MR

h a s

s a l d ,

~f

a

man

h a s

a

' l e g l t l m a t e

e x p e c t a t i o n ' ,

o f

w h i c h

i t

would

not

be

f a i r

t o

hlm

w l t h o u t

a

h e a r l n q ,

or

r e a s o n s

g i v e n

:

v

Amalgamated

Engineer lnq

Unlon

[ l 9 7 1 1

2

QB

175 a t p .191 ;

and

s ee

Schmid t

v

S e c r e t a r y of

S t a t e f o r H o m e A f f a l r s ,

[ l 9 6 9 1

2

Ch

1 4 9 a t p.170.

B u t I t would

be

wrong

t o

a t t e m p t

t o

g l v e

a n

e x h a u s t i v e

c l a s s i f l c a t i o n

o f

t h e

cases

where

t h e

p r i n c i p l e

s h o u l d

b e

a p p l i e d

:

Durayappah

v

Fe rnando ,

[ l 9 6 7 1

2 AC 337 a t p .349 .

The

q u e s t l o n

w h e t h e r

t h e

p r i n c i p l e s

o f

n a t u r a l

be d e p e n d s

a p p l l e d ,

and

i f

s o

w h a t

t h o s e

l u s t i c e

m u s t

p r l n c l p l e s

r e q u i r e ,

o

n

t h e

c l r c u m s t a n c e s

o f

e a c h

c a s e .

I n

t h e c a s e o €

a

s t a t u t o r y

p o w e r ,

t h e

q u e s t l o n

wlll D u r a y a p p a h

depend

on

t he

t r u e

c o n s t r u c t i o n

o f

t h e s t a t u t o r y p r i n c i p l e s

p r o v l s l o n

I n

l i g h t

of

t h e common

l a w

( c f

v

Fernando

[ l 9 6 7 1

2

AC

a t

p . 3 5 0 ) .

In

Durayappah

v

F e r n a n d o ,

L o r d

U p j o h n ,

d e l l v e r l n g

t h e

r e a s o n s

o f

t h e w h i c g

P r l v v

. C o u n c i l ,

s a l d

t h a t

' t h e r e

a re

t h r e e

m a t t e r s

m u s t

a lways

be

bo rne

In

mlnd

when

c o n s i d e r l n g

w h e t h e r

t h e

p r l n c l p l e

s h o u l d

b e

a p p l l e d

or n o t ' , [ l 9 6 7 1 2 AC 337 a t p.349.

He

went

on :

' T h e s e

t h r e e

m a t t e r s

a r e

:

f l r s t , what is t h e

n a t u r e

o f

t h e

p r o p e r t y ,

t h e

o f f l c e

h e l d ,

s t a tus

e n j o y e d

or

s e r v l c e s

t o

be

per formed

by

t h e

c o m p l a l n a n t

o f

Injustice.

S e c o n d l y ,

I n

w h a t

c i r c u m s t a n c e s

o r

upon

what

occasions 1s

t h e

p e r s o n c l a l m i n g

t o

b e e n t i t l e d t o

exerc lse

t h e

measure

o f

c o n t r o l

e n t l t l e d

t o

I n t e r v e n e .

T h l r d l y ,

when

a

r i g h t

t o

i n t e r v e n e

i s

p r o v e d ,

w h a t

s a n c t i o n s

i n

f a c t

i s

t h e

l a t t e r

e n t i t l e d

t o impose

upon

t h e o t h e r . '

10.

There may o f

c o u r s e d e c i d l n g

b e

o t h e r

m a t t e r s

t h a t

wlll

be

r e l e v a n t

I n

w h e t h e r

t h e

p r i n c l p l e s

a p p l y

:

f o r

e x a m p l e ,

t h e

n a t u r e

o f

t h e

b o d y l a n g u a g e

on

w h l c h

t h e

power

i s c o n f e r r e d ,

t h e

I n whlch

t h e power

i s

c o n f e r r e d ,

a n d

t h e

p r e s e n c e

I n

t h e

s t a t u t e

of

p r o v l s l o n s e n a b l l n g

t h e

exerclse

o f

t h e

p o w e r

t o

b e

rev lewed."

I n

The

Queen

v

MacKellar ;

Ex

p a r t e R a t u ,

( 1 9 7 7 )

1 3 7

C L R

4 6 1 ,

Mason

J s a l d ,

a t

p . 4 7 6

:

" I n

Mob11

011

A u s t r a l i a

P t y

L t d

v

F e d e r a l

-__---_-----I--

-----

Commlss lone r

o f

Taxa t ion ,

(1963)

113

C L R

4 7 5 ,

K l t t o

J p o l n t e d o p p o r t u n l t y t o p a r t i e s i n c o n t r o v e r s y

o u t

t h a t

t h e p r e - ~ u d l c i a l

o b l i g a t l o n

t o

g l v e

a

f a i r

t o

c o r r e c t

o r

c o n t r a d l c t

s t a t e m e n t s

t o

t h e l r

v l e w

depended

on

' t h e t o s a y

p a r t l c u l a r

s t a t u t o r y

f r a m e w o r k '

and

went

on

a t p.504

:

'By

t h e

s t a t u t o r y p r o v i s i o n s

f r a m e w o r k

I

mean

t h e

e x p r e s s

a n d

i m p l l e d

o

f

t h e

r e l e v a n t

A c t

and

t h e

I n f e r e n c e s

of

l e g l s l a t l v e

l n t e n t l o n

t o

be

d r a w n

f r o m

t h e

c l r c u m s t a n c e s

t o

w h l c h

t h e

Act

was

d i r e c t e d

a n d

f r o m

I t s

s u b l e c t - m a t t e r

:

c f

Rldge

v

Baldwin ,

[ l 9 6 4 1 AC

40

a t p .73 .

A s

Tucker

L J s a l d

I n

Russe l l

v

Duke o f

N o r f o l k

[ l 9 4 9 1

1 A l l ER

1 0 9 ,

i n a

passage

approved

by

t h e

P r i v y

C o u n c i l

I n

U n l v e r s l t y

of

Ceylon

v

Fe rnando ,

[ l 9 6 0 1 a p p l i c a t i o n

1 WLR

223 a t p .231;

[ l9601

1

A l l ER

631 a t p . 6 3 7 ,

t h e r e

a r e

n

o

w o r d s

w h l c h

a r e

o

f

u n l v e r s a l

t o

e v e r y

k i n d

of

l n q u i r y

a n d

e v e r y

k l n d

o f

t r i b u n a l

:

" t h e

r e q u i r e m e n t s

o f

n a t u r a l

j u s t l c e

m u s t

depend

on

t h e

c i r c u m s t a n c e s

o f

t h e

case,

t h e

n a t u r e

of

1

t h e

I n q u i r y ,

t h e

r u l e s

u n d e r

w h l c h

t h e

t r i b u n a l

i s a c t i n g ,

t h e s u b l e c t

m a t t e r

t h a t

i s

b e l n g

d e a l t

w i t h ,

and

s o

f o r t h " ,

[ l 9 4 9 1

1 A l l

E R

a t p .118 .

What- t h e

law

r e q u i r e s

I n

t h e

d i s c h a r g e

o f

a

q u a s i - ~ u d i c l a l

f u n c t i o n

i s

a

j u d i c l a l

f a l r n e s s .

T h a t

is n o t a

l a b e l

f o r

a n y

f l x e d

b o d y

o f

ru l e s .

What

1 s f a l r

i n

a

s i t u a t i o n

g l v e n

d e p e n d s

u p o n c l r c u m s t a n c e s '

t h e

.I'

See

a l s o

t h e

~ u d g m e n t s

o f Commission,

t h e

F u l l

H l g h

C o u r t

i n

H e a t l e y

v

Tasmanlan

Racing

and

Gamlng

( 1 9 7 7 )

1 3 7

C L R

487.

In

t h e

Sa leml a s c e r t a l n

and

Ra tu

ca ses ,

t h e

Cour t

examlned

t h e

M i g r a t l o n

-

Act

1 9 5 8

t o

w h e t h e r

t h e

M l n i s t e r ,

when

maklng

a

d e c l s l o n

u n d e r

s . 1 8

f o r

t h e

d e p o r t a t i o n

o f

a

p r o h l b l t e d

i m m l g r a n t ,

was

r e q u i r e d

t o

g l v e

t o

t h e

p r o h l b l t e d

i m m l g r a n t

a

11.

r i g h t

t o

be

h e a r d .

I

h a v e

d i s c u s s e d

t h e

judgments

I n

t h i s

r e s p e c t

i n -----I----

M i n i s t e r

f o r

I m m l q r a t l o n

a n d

E t h n l c

A f f a i r s

v

HaJ - I sma l l ,

4 0

ALR

341,

and

I

n e e d

n o t

a d d

t o c o n c l u d e

w h a t

I

t h e r e

s a i d .

I n

my

v i e w ,

t h o s e

a u t h o r l t i e s

b l n d

t h l s

C o u r t

t o

t h a t

t h e

M i n i s t e r

1 s

n o t

r e q u l r e d

t o

c o m p l y

w i t h

t h e

r u l e s

o f

n a t u r a l

l u s t l c e when

maklng

an

o

rder

under

s .18 .

However,

t h a t

v l e w

was

b a s e d

p r i n c l p a l l y

u p o n

t h e

provisions

-of

t h e

M i g r a t i o n

A c t

w h i c h

made

I t c l e a r

t h a t

a

p r o h l b l t e d

l m m l g r a n t

h a s n o C J s a i d , a t

r i g h t

t o

r e m a i n

i n

A u s t r a l i a .

I n

S a l e m i ' s

c a s e ,

B a r w i c k

p . 4 0 6

:

" T h e

p r o h i b i t e d

i m m l g r a n t

h a s ,

I n p e r s o n a l

my

o p i n l o n ,

no

c la lm

t o

t h e

c o n s i d e r a t i o n

o f

h l s

c i r c u m s t a n c e s

:

n o r ,

as

I

h a v e

s a l d ,

a re

t h e r e

a n y

p r l n c l p l e s

w h l c h

t h e

M i n i s t e r

c o u l d

b

e

c o m p e l l e d

t o

o b s e r v e

i n

d e c i d l n g

I n

h l s

case

t h a t

t h e

l a w

m u s t

b e

e n f o r c e d .

A s I have

obse rved ,

t hough

be lng

a

p r o h l b i t e d

l m m l g r a n t

1 s

n o t

a n

o f f e n c e ,

t h e

p r e s e n c e

o f

t h e

p r o h i b i t e d

i m m l g r a n t

i n

Aus t ra l la

i s

u n l a w f u l .

D e p o r t a t i o n

is

c o n s e q u e n c e

t h e

p r e s c r l b e d

:

a n d

t h e

M l n l s t e r

h a s

t h e r e a l i t y

power

t o

o r d e r

i t .

The

p r o v l s l o n s

I n

s.18

a r e

I n

m e r e l y

t h e

m e t h o d

b y

w h i c h

t h e

p r o c e s s

o f

d e p o r t a t l o n

may

be

i n i t l a t e d . "

0

I n R a t u ' s

c a s e ,

Mason

J

s a i d ,

a t

p p . 4 7 8 - 9 ,

"The

c h a r a c t e r

of

t h e

p o w e r

t o

make

a

d e p o r t a t i o n

o r d e r u n d e r c i r c u m s t a n c e

s . 18

m a y

b e

d e d u c e d

p a r t l y

f r o m

t h e r e l a t i o n

t h a t

i t

IS

e x e r c i s a b l e

I n

t o

a

p r o h l b l t e d

i m m i g r a n t ,

t h a t

ls,

a

p e r s o n

who

e n t e r s

o r

r e m a i n s

I n

A u s t r a l i a

w i t h o u t

l a w f u l

a u t h o r i t y .

Un l lke

e n t r y - i n t o

A u s t r a l l a

w i t h o u t

a

p e r m i t

-

w h i c h

d o e s

c o n s t i t u t e

a n

o f f e n c e

u n d e r

s . 2 7 ( l ) ( a )

-

r e m a l n i n g

i n

A u s t r a l l a

a f t e r

a n

e n t r y

p e r m l t

h a s

been

c a n c e l l e d

or

h a s

e x p l r e d

a n d

h a s

n o t b e e n t h o u g h

r e n e w e d

d o e s

n o t

c o n s t l t u t e

a n

o f f e n c e ,

f a l l u r e

t o

c o m p l y

w l t h

a

r e q u l r e m e n t

u n d e r

s . 7 ( 5 )

i s

a n

o f f e n c e .

However,

n e i t h e r

t h e f a c t

t h a t

a

p e r s o n

m a y

r e m a l n

i n

A u s t r a l l a

a f t e r

c a n c e l l a t i o n

o r o f f e n c e

e x p i r y

o f

h i s

e n t r y

p e r m i t

w l t h o u t

c o m m l t t l n g

a n

n o r

t h e

f a c t

t h a t

h e

wlll

cease

t o be

a d e p o r t a t l o n

p r o h l b l t e d

l m m i g r a n t

i f

h e

s t a y s

h e r e

f o r f l v e a g a i n s t

y e a r s ,

n o

o r d e r

b e l n g

made

h i m ,

d e t r a c t s

f r o m

h l s

c h a r a c t e r

as

a

p r o h i b l t e d

I m m i g r a n t

I n

t h e

m e a n t m e .

He

1s

l i a b l e

t o

a r r e s t

a n d

d e t e n t i o n .

He

i s a n

i l l e g a l

i m m l g r a n t ,

h a v l n g

n o

r i g h t

o r

t l t l e

t o

r e m a l n

h e r e

( R e g . v

F o r b e s ;

Ex

p a r t e Kwok

Kwan

Lee,

( 1 9 7 1 ) 124

r

12.

CLR

168

a t p . 1 7 3 ) .

T h e m a k l n g t h e r e f o r e

o f p r o v l d e s

a

d e p o r t a t i o n

o r d e r

u n d e r

s . 1 8

l a w f u l

a u t h o r i t y

f o r

t h e

r e m o v a l

from

Aust ra l la

a g a l n s t h l s

wlll

o f r e m a i n :

a

p e r s o n

who

h a s

n o

r l g h t

t o

r e m a l n

h e r e .

I t

1 s n o t t h e case

t h a t

t h e

o r d e r

t e r m i n a t e s

h i s

r i g h t

t o

n o r

c a n

l t

be

s a i d

I n

t h e

o r d i n a r y

case

t h a t

I t

d e p r i v e s

h l m

o f

a

l e g l t l m a t e

e x p e c t a t l o n

t h a t

h e

will

be

a l l o w e d

t o

r e m a i n

here.

D e p o r t a t l o n ,

f o r

w h i c h

t h e

o r d e r

p r o v l d e s ,

1 s

t h e n f a l l u r e

b u t

a

consequence

o f

t h e

p r o h i b l t e d

i m m l g r a n t ' s

t o

d e p a r t

when

h e

h a s

n o

r i g h t

t o

r e m a i n

.I'

I n

my

o p l n i o n ,

t h e m a t t e r

v i e w s

e x p r e s s e d

I n

S a l e m i ' s

c a s e

a n d

R a t u ' s

c a s e

d l d

n o t

d e a l

w l t h

t h e

w l t h

which

we

a r e

c o n c e r n e d .

l

-

I n d e e d ,

I n

S a l e m i ' s

c a s e ,

G i b b s

J

s a l d ,

a t

p . 4 1 6

:

"Once

a

permit

1s a c t u a l l y

g r a n t e d ,

lt

may

be

c a n c e l l e d o n l y I f

t h e A c t p e r m l t s t h a t t o

be

d o n e

-

we

a r e

n o t

c o n c e r n e d r e g a r d . "

t o

c o n s l d e r

t h e

e f f e c t

o f

t h e

Act I n

t h a t

Ir:

R a t u ' s

c a s e ,

Mason

J

c o n c l u d e d ,

a

t

p p . 4 8 0 - 1

:

" I t i s n o t

a

case

I n a d v a n c e

w h i c h

n a t u r a l

j u s t i c e

o r

f a i r n e s s

d l c t a t e s

t h a t

a n

no t l ce

be

g l v e n ;

I t is n o t a case i n

w h i c h

a e x p e c t a t l o n

c h a r g e

i s

b r o u g h t

a g a i n s t

a

p e r s o n

or

i n

w h i c h

a

p c r s o n

i s

d e p r l v e d

o f

a

r l g h t

o r

t h e

l e g i t l m a t e

o f

a

b e n e f l t .

The

c o n s l d e r a t l o n s

a f f e c t i n g

t h e

g r a n t

o r

e x t e n s i o n

o f

e n t r y

permits

a r e

v e r y

different

f r o m t h o s e 119691 2 Ch a t pp.170-171."

r e l a t i n g

t o

t h e

r e n e w a l

o f

l i c e n c e s

-

s e e

S c h m i d t

v

S e c r e t a r y

o f

S t a t e

f o r

Home

A f f a i r s ,

-

-

I n

so

e x p r e s s l n g

h l m s e l f ,

h i s

Honour

d l s t l n g u l s h e d

b e t w e e n

t h e

c i r c u m s t a n c e s

o f

t h e

g r a n t

o r

e x t e n s l o n

o f

a n

e n t r y

p e r m i t

a n d

t h e

c a n c e l l a t l o n

t h e r e o f ,

t h e

e f f e c t

o f

w h i c h

i s

t o

d e p r l v e

a

p e r s o n

o

f

a

n

e x i s t l n g

r i g h t .

S e c t i o n

7 ( 1 )

o f

t h e

M i g r a t l o n

A

c

t

1 9 5 8

p r o v l d e s

:

"The

M l n l s t e r

may,

i n

h i s

a b s o l u t e

d l s c r e t l o n ,

c a n c e l

a

t e m p o r a r y

e n t r y

permlt

a t

a n y

time

by

w r i t i n g

u n d e r

h i s

h a n d . "

Were

i t

n o t

f o r

t h e

word

" a b s o l u t e "

w h l c h

a p p e a r s

i n

t h i s

L.

I '

.

.'

,-'

1 3 .

s u b - s e c t i o n ,

I

wou ld

have

no

doub

t

t ha t j u s t i c e

t he

Mln l s t e r

was

bound

t o

c o m p l y

w i t h

t h e

rules

o f

n a t u r a l

when

making

s u c h

a

d e c i s l o n .

A

p e r s o n

i n

t h i s

c o u n t r y

p u r s u a n t

t o

a

p e r m l t

h a s

a

r i g h t

t o

r e m a i n

u n l e s s

t h e

p e r m i t

1s

c a n c e l l e d .

T h l s

i s

a

most

s l g n i f i c a n t

r i g h t

a s

1 s

r e c o g n i s e d

i n

A r t l c l e

1 3

o f

t h e

I n t e r n a t l o n a l

C o n v e n a n t

o

n

C i v i l

a n d

P o l i t i c a l

R i g h t s ,

a

S c h e d u l e

t o

t h e

Human Rights

Commiss

lon

Act t e r r i t o r y

1981,

w h i c h

r e a d s

:

"An

a l l e n

l a w f u l l y

i n

t h e

o f

a

S t a t e

-

P a r t y

t o

t h e

p r e s e n t

C o v e n a n t

may

b e

e x p e l l e d

t h e r e f r o m

o n l y

I n

p u r s u a n c e

o f

a e x c e p t

d e c i s i o n

r e a c h e d

i n

a c c o r d a n c e

w i t h

law

a n d s e c u r i t y

s h a l l ,

w h e r e

c o m p e l l i n g

r e a s o n s

o f

n a t l o n a l

o t h e r w l s e

r e q u i r e ,

b e

a l l o w e d

t o

s u b m l t

t h e

r e a s o n s

a g a l n s t

h l s expulsion

a n d

t o p u r p o s e

h a v e b e f o r e ,

h l s

c a s e

r e v l e w e d

b y ,

a n d

be

r e p r e s e n t e d

f o r

t h e

t h e

c o m p e t e n t

a u t h o r i t y

o r

a

p e r s o n

o r

p e r s o n s

e s p e c i a l l y

d e s i g n a t e d b y

t h e c o m p e t e n t

a u t h o r i t y . "

T h l s

A r t l c l e

r e c o g n l s e s

t h a t

a n

a l i e n

may

e s t a b l l s h

s t r o n g

f a m l l y ,

s o c i a l

a n d

b u s i n e s s

t i e s

w i t h

a

c o u n t r y

o t h e r

t h a n

h i s

homeland

of

which

i t would be un-just

t o

d e p r i v e

h lm

wl thou t

g l v l n g

hlm

an

o p p o r t u n i t y

t o

be

h e a r d .

I t

1s n o t

s u r p r l s l n g ,

t h e r e f o r e ,

t h a t

i n

S c h m l d t

v

S e c r e t a r y

o f

0

S t a t e

f o r

Home

A f f a l r s

[ l 9 6 9 1

2

Ch

1 4 9 ,

Lord

Dennlng

FIR

e x p r e s s e d

t h e

v i e w

t h a t

t h e r e

w a s

n o

r e q u l r e m e n t

t o

o b s e r v e

t h e

rules

o f

n a t u r a l

l u s t l c e

i n

r e l a t l o n

t o

a

p e r s o n

who

was

n o t r e l a t i o n

l a w f u l l y

I n

t h e

c o u n t r y

b u t

t h a t t h e same

p o s l t i o n

d l d

n o c

a p p l y

I n

t o

t h e

c a n c e l l a t i o n

o f

a

p e r m i t .

1. His

L o r d s h i p

s a i d

a t

p . 1 7 1

:

" I f

h i s

p e r m i t

i s r e p r e s e n t a t l o n s

r e v o k e d

b e f o r e

t h e

time

limit

e x p l r e s ,

h e

o u g h t ,

I

t h i n k ,

t o

b e

g i v e n

a n

o p p o r t u n i t y

o f

m a k i n g

:

f o r

h e

w o u l d

h a v e

a

l e g l t i m a t e t h e p e r m i t t e d

e x p e c t a t i o n

o f

b e i n g

a l l o w e d

t o

s t a y

f o r

time.

Cxcept

I n

s u c h a

c a s e ,

a

f o r e l g n a l i e n

h a s

no

r l g h t -

a n d ,

I

would

a d d ,

n o

l e g i t i m a t e

e x p e c t a t i o n

-

o f

b e i n g

a l l o w e d

s t a y .

t o

He

r e f u s e d

c a n

b e

w i t h o u t

r e a s o n s

g i v e n

a n d

w i t h o u t

a

h e a r i n g .

Once

h i s

time

h a s

e x p l r e d ,

h

e

h a s

t o

go."

I n H e a t l e y

v

Tasmanlan

Raclng

a n d

Gaming

Commission,

c l t e d a b o v e ,

I t was held

by

Stephen,

Mason,

Murphy

and

Aickln

JJ,

Barwick

C J

14.

d l s s e n t l n g ,

t h a t

t h e

Tasmanian

Raclng

and

Gaming

Commisslon

had

t o

c o m p l y

w i t h

t h e

r u l e s

o f

n a t u r a l

j u s t i c e

when

r e q u i r i n g

a

p e r s o n t o n e c e s s a r y f o r me

r e f r a l n

f r o m

e n t e r i n g

a

r a c e c o u r s e .

I t

i s

h a r d l y

t o s t a t e

t h a t ,

i f t h e

exclusion

o f

a

p e r s o n

f r o m

a r a c e c o u r s e p r l n c i p l e s

1s

a

c l r c u m s t a n c e

r e q u l r l n g

t h e

a p p l l c a t i o n

o f

t h e

o f

n a t u r a l

l u s t i c e ,

t h e n

a n

e v e n

m o r e

a p p r o p r l a t e

c a s e ,

I n

t h e

a b s e n c e

o f

l e g l s l a t i v e

i n t e n t i o n .

t o

t h e c o n t r a r y ,

1s

0

t h e

c a n c e l l a t l o n

e n t r y

a n

o f

p e r m i t .

S u c h a u t h o r i t y

a

c a n c e l l a t l - o n

t e r m l n a t e s

t h e

w h l c h

t h e

h o l d e r

h a s

t o

s t a y

i n

A u s t r a l i a

t o e n l o y t h e f a m i l y ,

b u s i n e s s a n d s o c i a l

t l e s

w h l c h

t h e

h o l d e r m a y c a n c e l l a t l o n

h a v e

e s t a b l i s h e d

t h l s

c o u n t r y .

I n

S u c h

a

m a y ,

m o r e o v e r ,

p r e c l u d e

r e l i a n c e

u p o n

s.6A(l)(e)

o f

t h e

M i g r a t i o n

A c t .

Mr P. s u b m l t t e d t h a t I n

R o b e r t s ,

o f

c o u n s e l ,

who

a p p e a r e d

f o r

t h e

r e s p o n d e n t ,

Salemi's

case

and

Ra tu '

S

c a s e

t h e

H l g h C o u r t

o f

A u s t r a l i a

e x p r e s s e d

i t s

v i e w

t h a t

d e c i s i o n s

t a k e n be s u b j e c t

b y

t h e

M i n i s t e r

u n d e r

t h e

Migration Act

were

n o t

t o

t o

t h e

r u l e s

o f

n a t u r a l

l u s t i c e

e x c e p t

i n

a

c i r c u m s t a n c e s u c h a s a

d e c i s i o n

u n d e r

s . 1 4

o f

t h e M l q r a t i o n A c t

-

w h e r e

t h e P a r l i a m e n t

e x p r e s s l y p r o v l d e d

0

f o r

s u c h S a l e m l ' s case and

c o m p l i a n c e .

B u t

I

h a v e

a l r e a d y

i n d l c a t e d

my

v i e w

t h a t

R a t u ' s case

were

cases d e a l i n g w l t h

s.18

o f

t h e

M i g r a t l o n Act

and

t h a t t h e y

s h o u l d

n o t

b e

read

a s

d e t e r m l n i n g

t h e

p o s i t i o n

u n d e r

s . 7 ( 1 ) ,

e x c e p t

i n

s o

f a r

a s

t h e

j u d g m e n t s

d l s c u s s e d

t h e

p r l n c l p l e s

t o

b e

a p p l i e d .

-

Glbbs

J

s a l d ,

i n

S a l e m i ' s

c a s e ,

a t

p . 4 1 9 ,

" I n

t h e

case

o f

a

s t a t u t o r y

power,

t h e

q u e s t i o n

will

d e p e n d

o n

t h e

t r u e

c o n s t r u c t l o n

o f

t h e

s t a t u t o r y

p r o v i s i o n

i n

t h e

l l g h t

o f

t h e

common

l a w

p r l n c l p l e s " .

I t

1s

t h u s

n e c e s s a r y

g i v e

t o

f u l l

e € f e c t t o t h e terms

o f

t h e s t a t u t e .

However,

a s

J a c o b s J

sa ld

I n

S a l e m l ' s

c a s e

a t p .451

:

" I a c c e p t

t h a t

i n

t h e

c a s e

o

f

s t a t u t o r y

p r o v i s i o n s

I t

1s

a l w a y s

a

m a t t e r

o f

d l s c o v e r i n g t h e

i n t e n t l o n

of

t h e

legislature.

B u t

t h a t

d o e s

n o t

c a r r y

u s

v e r y

f a r .

The

l e g i s l a t u r e

is

a s s u m e d

b y

t h e

c o u r t s

t o

b e

a w a r e

o f

t h e

p r i n c i p l e s

o f

n a t u r a l

l u s t i c e

w h i c h

a r e

a

p a r t

o f

t h e

common

law.

The

a p p l i c a t i o n

o f

t h o s e

p r l n c l p l e s

d e p e n d s

o n

t h e

c i r c u m s t a n c e s

o f

t h e

case.

I t

i s

s e l d o m

p o s s l b l e

t o

s a y

i n p a r t i c u l a r

t h e

case

of

t h e

e x e r c l s e

o f

a n y

s t a t u t o r y

p o w e r

' A l l

t h e

p r l n c l p l e s

w h i c h

h a v e

e v e r

b e e n

a p p l i e d

i n

e n s u r i n g

n a t u r a l

~ u s t l c e w i l l

here

a p p l y '

o r

o n

t h e

o t h e r

h a n d

' N a t u r a l

j u s t i c e

was

l n t e n d e d

w h o l l y

b e

t o

e x c l u d e d ' .

The

q u e s t i o n s

w h l c h

m u s t

b e

a s k e d

a r e

- i n

p a r t i c u l a r

c i r c u m s t a n c e s

s u c h

a s

e x l s t e x c l u d e d ?

I n

t h i s

case

d i d t h e l e g l s l a t u r e i n t e n d t h a t - t h e p r i n c l p l e s

o f

n a t u r a l

j u s t i c e

s h o u l d

b e

w h o l l y

I f

n o t ,

w h a t

p a r t l c u l a r

p r l n c l p l e s

s h o u l d

be

a p p l l e d ?

I

r e c o g n i z e

t h a t

t h e

s e a r c h

f o r

l e g l s l a t l v e

I n t e n t i o n

c a n

b

e

d e s c r l b e d

as

somewhat

a r t i f l c i a l .

What

t h e

c o u r t s

d o

i n

t h e

a b s e n c e

of

e x p r e s s

l e g l s l a t i v e

i n t e n t i o n

1s

t o

ensure

t h a t

p o w e r ,

w h e t h e r

l t

b e

~ u d i c i a l

o r w e l g h l n g

q u a s l - j u d l c i a l

o r

e x e c u t l v e ,

be

e x e r c i s e d

f a l r l y ,

t h e

I n t e r e s t s

o f

t h e

l n d i v l d u a l

a n d

t h e

I n t e r e s t s

of

s o c i e t y a s

a

whole ."

Mr

R o b e r t s

r e l l e d

u p o n

t h e

w o r d

" a b s o l u t e "

i n

s.7(1)

a n d

s u b m i t t e d

t h a t

t h i s

w o r d

I n d i c a t e d

a n

i n t e n t l o n

o f M i n l s t e r

P a r l i a m e n t

t h a t

t h e

discretion

t o be

e x e r c l s e d

b y

t h e

was

t o t a l l y

u n f e t t e r e d .

e

That

Indeed

was ,

I

t h l n k ,

t h e

v l e w

w h l c h

was

t aken

by

Ba rwlck

C J

I n

S a l e m i ' s

case

a t p . 4 0 3

a n d

i n

R a t u ' s

c a s e

a t p .466 .

Alckln

J

may

appea r

t o h a v e

a c c e p t e d

t h a t

v i e w

i n

R a t u ' s

c a s e

a t

pp.485-6

b u t

I

t h i n k

h i s

H o n o u r ' s

r e m a r k s

a r e

e q u i v o c a l

o n

t h l s

p o l n t .

No

o t h e r member

of

t h e

C o u r t

e x p r e s s e d

t h i s

v l e w

a n d ,

a s

Barwick

C J was

t h e d i s s e n t l n g

member

I n H e s t l e y ' s c a s e ,

I

d o n o t g i v e

t h e

s a m e

w e i g h t

t o

h i s

H o n o u r ' s

v i e w

I n

t h i s

r e g a r d

t h a t

o t h e r w i s e

I

may

have

done

.

The

word

" a b s o l u t e "

u n d o u b t e d l y

i n d i c a t e s

t h a t

t h e

M l n l s t e r

h a s

a

v e r y

w i d e

d i s c r e t i o n

b u t

I t

d o e s

n o t

n e c e s s a r i l y

h a v e

t h e

e f f e c t

t h a t

t h e

M l n i s t e r ' s

d i s c r e t i o n

i s

t o t a l l y

u n f e t t e r e d .

I n d e e d ,

Mr

R o b e r t s

d i d

n o t C o u r t .

s u b m l t

t h a t

t h e

word

" a b s o l u t e "

p r e c l u d e s

r e v l e w

b y

t h i s

T h e

Issue

is

w h e t h e r

t h e

word

" a b s o l u t e " ,

I n a d d i t i o n d l s c r e t l o n ,

to maklng

i t c lear

t h a t

t h e

M i n i s t e r

h a s

a

v e r y

w i d e

a l s o

p r o v i d e s

t h a t

a

d e c l s l o n

may

bc

made

w l t h o u t

,'

16.

c o m p l y l n g

w l t h

t h e

r u l e s

n a t u r a l

o f

j u s t i c e .

The

r u l e s

o f

n a t u r a l

j u s t i c e

a r e

I n t e n d e d

t o

e n s u r e

t h a t

t h e

p e r s o n

t o

b e

a d v e r s e l y

a f f e c t e d

b y

a

d e c i s i o n

h a s

a

f a i r

o p p o r t u n i t y

o f

c o r r e c t i n g

t h e

m l s a p p r e h e n s l o n s o f f a c t w h l c h

may

o t h e r w l s e

e x i s t

a n d

o

f

p u t t i n g

f o r w a r d

f a c t o r s

w h l c h

a re

r e l e v a n t

t o

t h e e x e r c l s e

o f

a

d i s c r e t i o n a n d m l g h t n o t

o t h e r w i s e b e

known.

On

t h e

w h o l e ,

I

t h l n k t h a t

t h e

word

" a b s o l u t e "

i n

s.7( 1) d o e s

n o t

e

h a v e t h e p r l n c i p l e

e f f e c t

f o r

w h i c h

Mr

R o b e r t s

c o n t e n d e d .

The

c o r r e c t

i s ,

i n my

v i e w ,

s t a t e d

i n

d e

S m l t h ' s

" J u d i c l a l

R e v i e w

o f

A d m i n i s t r a t i v e

A c t i o n " ,

4 t h

e d . ,

p . 1 8 6 , h o l d i n g

a s

f o l l o w s

:

"There

m a y

b e

s o u n d

r e a s o n s

f o r

t h a t

i n

a

p a r t l c u l a r

c o n t e x t

i t

w i l l

be

u n d e s l r a b l e

o r

l m p r a c t l c a b l e

f o r

a

c o u r t

of

law

t o

e n g r a f t

a n y

p r o c e d u r a l

d u t y

o n

t o

a

w i d e

d l s c r e t i o n a r y

p o w e r ;

b u t

t h e

m e r e

f a c t

t h a t

t h e

d l s c r e t l o n a r y

p o w e r

is

v e r y

w l d e

1 s

i n c o n c l u s l v e .

The

n a t u r e

o f

t h e

p o w e r ,

t h e

c o n d l t i o n

u n d e r e x l s t e n c e

w h i c h

I t

h a s

t o

be

e x e r c l s e d

( t h e

o f

s e l f - I m p o s e d

r u l e s ,

p o l i c y or

p r e c e d e n t s

may

b e

r e l e v a n t

h e r e )

a n d

i t s

i m p a c t

o

n

t h e

I n t e r e s t s

o

f

I n d i v i d u a l s

m u s t

a l l

be

t a k e n

i n t o

a c c o u n t . "

T h u s ,

i n

H e a t l e y

v

Tasmanlan

Raclng

and

Gamlng

Commlssion,

c i ted comply

a b o v e ,

A i c k i n

J

a c c e p t e d

t h a t

t h e

Commiss ion

should

wi

th

t h e r u l e s d i s c r e t i o n " .

o f

n a t u r a l

j u s t i c e

t h o u g h

i t

h a d

a n

" a b s o l u t e

His

Honour

t h e r e

s a i d ,

a t p.515

:

" T h i s

i s

n o t

t o

s a y

t h a t

t h e

C o m m i s s i o n

i s

o b l i g e d

t o

a d h e r e

t o

t h e

r u l e s

o f

e v l d e n c e

or

c o n d u c t

f o r m a l

h e a r i n g s

or

t o be

s a t i s f i e d

a c c o r d i n g

t o

a n y

s t a t e d

o n u s

o f

p r o o f .

-

I t

i s

c l e a r

t h a t

t h e

C o m m l s s i o n

h a s t h e y may

a n

' a b s o l u t e

d i s c r e t i o n ' ,

i n

t h e

s e n s e

t h a t

d e v i s e

t h e l r

own

c r i t e r l a

a n d

n o

a p p e a l

i s a b s o l u t e

a v a i l a b l e

a g a i n s t

t h e l r

decision,

whether

I t b e

m i s t a k e n

o r

n o t .

T h e y

a r e

o f d e c l s l o n

c o u r s e

n o t

p r o t e c t e d

b y

t h e

n a t u r e

o f

t h e l r

d l s c r e t i o n

i n

a

ca se

w h e r e

t h e l r

i s

a f f e c t e d

b y

b i a s

o r

I n t e r e s t . "

I n

my

o p i n i o n ,

i n

s . 7 ( 1 )

t h e

w o r d s

" a b s o l u t e

d i s c r e t i o n "

h a v e

t h e

e f f e c t

a t t r i b u t e d

t o

them

by

Alckin

J

i n

H e a t l e y ' s

c a s e ,

t h a t

i s

t o

s a y ,

t h a t d l s c r e t i o n

t h e

d e c i s i o n - m a k e r

h a s

a

v e r y

w l d e

o r

a b s o l u t e

b u t

i s

n e v e r t h e l e s s

r e q u i r e d

t o

e x e r c i s e

t h a t

I

I

17.

discretion

i n

a

p r o p e r

m a n n e r .

I n d e e d ,

t h e

f a c t

t h a t

t h e S c h e d u l e

d i s c r e t i o n

1s n o t

i n c l u d e d

i n

e i t h e r

1 o r

S c h e d u l e

2

t o

t h e

A d m l n l s t r a t l v e

Decisions

(Judicial

Revlew)

Act

1 9 7 7

1 s

a n

I n d i c a t i o n

t h a t

P a r l l a m e n t

l n t e n d s

t h a t

a

d e c i s i o n

u n d e r

s . 7 ( 1 )

w l l l be

a

r e a s o n e d

d e c i s i o n

p r o p e r l y

c o n s i d e r e d .

I n t h e c o n t e x t

my

v l e w ,

t h e

w o r d s

" a b s o l u t e

d l s c r e t l o n "

d o

n o t ,

i n

I n

s . 7 (1 ) ,

e x c l u d e

t h e

o p e r a t l o n

o f

t h e

p r l n c i p l e s

o f

n a t u r a l

j u s t i c e .

I

e

t h i n k

t h a t ,

when

p r o p e r l y

c o n s t r u e d

i n

t h e

l i g h t

o f

t h e

common

l a w

p r l n c l p l e s

as

t o

n a t u r a l

j u s t l c e ,

s . 7 ( 1 )

w h l c h

a u t h o r i s e s

t h e

c a n c e l l a t i o n

o f

a

m o s t

v a l u a b l e

r i g h t ,

t h e

r i g h t

t o

r e m a l n

i n

A u s t r a l l a ,

c o n f e r s

a

d i s c r e t i o n

n h l c h

i s

t o

b e

e x e r c l s e d

i n

a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e p r l n c i p l e s o f n a t u r a l

j u s t i c e .

T h a t

1s

n o t n a t u r a l

t o

s a y

t h a t

a n y

r i g i d

r u l e s

o f

p r o c e d u r e

a p p l y . p r e c l u d e

The

r u l e s

o f

l u s t i c e

d o

n o t

t h e

mak ing

o f

an

a r b l t r a r y

d e c i s i o n

i n

a

c a s e

w h e r e

u r g e n t

o r

p o l i t i c a l

o r

n a t i o n a l

s e c u r l t y

f a c t o r s

n e g a t e

t h e

g i v i n g

o f

n o t l c e

t o

t h e

p e r s o n

t o

b e

a f f e c t e d

or

where

o t h e r

c i r c u m s t a n c e s

make

t h e

g l v i n g

o f

n o t i c e

i m p r a c t i c a b l e .

S e e

Murphy

J

i n

S a l e m l ' s

c a s e

a t p .457.

Nor d o

t h e

p r m c i p l e s

o f

n a t u r a l

j u s t l c e

r e q u l r e

t h a t

c)

t h e r e

b e

a

h e a r l n g c o n d u c t ,

I n

a

case where

t h e

p e r s o n s

t o

be

a f f e c t e d

h a v e ,

b y

t h e l r

f o r f e i t e d

t h e i r

c l a i m

t o

a

h e a r l n g .

See

Cinnamond v

B r i t i s h

A i r p o r t s

A u t h o r i t y

[ l 9 8 0 1

2

A l l ER 368.

!

Matters

o f

t h a t

t y p e a l l e g a t i o n s

were

n o t

i n v o l v e d

i n

t h e

p resent

c a s e .

I n d e e d ,

t h e

made

a g a i K s t

t h e h a v e

a p p l i c a n t

were

o f

t h e

v e r y type

of

which

t h e

a p p l i c a n t

s h o u l d

b e e n

g i v e n

n o t i c e .

The re

was

a n

a l l e g a t l o n

t h a t

t h e

m a r r l a g e

l n t o

w h l c h

s h e

h a d

e n t e r e d

was

n o t

a

g e n u l n e

m a r r i a g e ,

a n d

a

s u g g e s t i o n

t h a t ,

i n

t h e

e v e n t ,

s h e

h a d

p r e v l o u s l y

m a r r l e d

I n

T h a i l a n d

a n d

t h a t

h e r

s e c o n d

m a r r i a g e

was

bigamous. n a t u r a l

T h e s e

were

a l l e g a t i o n s

o f

t h e

t y p e

f o r

w h i c h

t h e

p r l n c i p l e s

o f

j u s t i c e

were

f ramed.

They

c o n c e r n e d

f a c t s

w h l c h

were

p r i n c i p a l l y

w l t h i n

t h e

k n o w l e d g e

o f

t h e

p e r s o n

t o

be g iven

a f f e c t e d .

T h e r e f o r e ,

t h e

p e r s o n

t o

b

e

a f f e c t e d

should

have

been

a

f a i r

o p p o r t u n l t y

t o

speak

a b o u t

them.

I'

.'

,-'

18.

As I have

men t ioned

above ,

I

t h i n k

t h a t

t h e

a p p l l c a n t

was

n o t

g l v e n

a d e q u a t e

n o t i c e

o f

t h e

d e c l s l o n

t o

b e

made

o r

o f

t h e

a l l e g a t l o n s

w h i c h

were

made

a g a l n s t

h e r .

S h e

was

s l m p l y

c a l l e d

t o a n n o t i c e

l n t e r v i e w

a n d

was

a s k e d

q u e s t l o n s .

S h e

was

n o t

g i v e

f a i r

o

f

t h e

m a t t e r s

w h l c h

w e r e

p u t

t o

t h e

M i n i s t e r

a g a l n s t

h e r

I n t e r e s t a n d s h e

was

n o t g l v e n

a

f a i r o p p o r t u n i t y t o r e b u t

them.

,

t h e s e

I n

c i r c u m s t a n c e s ,

t h e

d e c l s l o n

c a n c e l

t o

t e m p o r a r y

t h e

e n t r y p e r m i t h e l d b y t h e a p p l i c a n t s h o u l d b e

se t

a s ide .

I t

f o l l o w s

t h a t

t h e

d e c i s l o n

t o

d e p o r t

t h e

a p p l l c a n t

s h o u l d

a l s o

be

s e t

a s l d e .

I n

t h e

f i r s t

p l a c e ,

t h a t

d e c l s l o n

was

based

upon

t h e

c l r c u m s t a n c e

t h a t

t h e

a p p l l c a n t ' s

t e m p o r a r y

e n t r y

p e r m i t

h a d

b e e n

c a n c e l l e d

a n d

t h a t

s h e

was

t h e n

a

p r o h l b i t e d

l m m l g r a n t .

I n

t h e

c l r c u m s t a n c e s ,

t h e

d e p o r t a t i o n

o r d e r

was

wrong ly

based

and

s h o u l d

b e

s e t a s l d e .

See

Bowen

C J a n d

F r a n k i

J

i n

M l n i s t e r

f o r

_I-

I n m l q _ f a t l o n

a n d

----

E t h n l c

A f f a i r s v

X - I s m a i l ,

-----

c l t e d

a b o v e ,

a t

p .348 .

The

s e t t l n g

a s ide

o f

t h e

d e p o r t a t i o n

o r d e r

i s

a l s o

n e c e s s a r y

t o

g l v e

f u l l

f o r c e

a n d

e f f e c t

t o

t h e

C o u r t ' s

d e c l s i o n

t o

s e t

a s l d e

t h e

M i n l s t e r ' s

d e c i s i o n

t o

c a n c e l

t h e

a p p l i c a n t ' s

0,

t e m p o r a r y

e n t r y

p e r m l t .

The

c a n c e l l a t l o n

o f

t h e

t e m p o r a r y

e n t r y

p e r m i t

a n d

d e p o r t a t l o n

o r d e r

w e r e

c o n s i d e r e d

by

t h e

M i n l s t e r

a t

t h e

same

time.

T h e

C o u r t ' s

o r d e r

s e t t l n g

a s i d e

t h e

c a n c e l l a t l o n

o f

t h e

t e m p o r a r y

e n t r y

p e r m i t d e p o r t a t i o n

w o u l d

n o t

b e

f u l l y

e f f e c t i v e i f

t h e o r d e r

f o r

were

n o t

a l s o

set

a s i d e .

-

For

t h e s e r e a s o n s

t h e d e c i s i o n s u n d e r

revlew

s h o u l d

b e

s e t a s l d e .

T h e

r e s p o n d e n t

s h o u l d

p a y

t h e

a p p l l c a n t ' s

c o s t s

o f

t h e

p r o c e e d l n g s .

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

1

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0