Gade and Jabbar (No.16)

Link copied
Case Copied 6 min read

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

GADE & JABBAR (No.16) [2018] FCCA 2195
Catchwords:
FAMILY LAW – Property – wife to pay the husband’s costs of and incidental to an interim application concerning the wife’s failure to make mortgage payments.

Legislation:

Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s.117

Applicant: MR GADE
Respondent: MS JABBAR
File Number: NCC 2265 of 2015
Judgment of: Judge Terry
Hearing date: 19 March 2018
Date of Last Submission: 19 March 2018
Delivered at: Newcastle
Delivered on: 19 March 2018

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Weightman
Solicitors for the Applicant: NLS Law
The Respondent: In person

ORDERS

  1. The respondent shall pay the amount of $5,852.07 to Bank 1 by 5.00pm on 26 March 2018 and the respondent shall provide to the applicants’ solicitor evidence of payment by no later than 9.00am on 27 March 2018.

  2. If the respondent fails to pay the amount required by Order 1 then orders will forthwith be made in terms of Orders 2, 3 and 4 of the orders sought by the applicant in his application in a case filed on 24 January 2018.

  3. The existing order requiring the respondent to pay the mortgage payments in respect of the Property A property as they fall due continues to be in force until the final decision is delivered.

  4. The respondent shall pay the applicant’s costs of and incidental to the application in a case filed on 24 January 2018 fixed in the sum of $5,324.56 NOTING THAT the timeframe for which those costs are to be paid will be determined as part of the final decision concerning the property matter.

  5. Further consideration of the orders sought in the respondent’s response to the application in a case filed on 24 January 2018 is adjourned to delivery of the reserved decision.

  6. The applicant’s legal representative is granted liberty to apply to relist the matter should they consider it necessary to do so.

THE COURT NOTES THAT:

(A)The court will take into account in determining the property matter the evidence given today about the payment of rates by the applicant in respect of the Property A property NOTING THAT the respondent is of the view that she was not responsible for the payment of the rates and this issue will also be considered in the final decision.

(B) The court has informed the parties that it will use its best endeavours to ensure that a decision is handed down in relation to the parenting and property matter by 13 April 2018.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Gade & Jabbar (No.16) is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT
OF AUSTRALIA
AT NEWCASTLE

NCC 2265 of 2015

MR GADE

Applicant

And

MS JABBAR

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. These reasons for judgment were delivered orally and have been corrected from the transcript. Grammatical errors have been corrected and an attempt has been made to render the orally delivered reasons amenable to being read.

  2. I…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Gade and Jabbar (No.16) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2018] FCCA 2195
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Gade and Jabbar (No.16)*, Judge Terry considered an application concerning financial and parenting matters. The dispute involved the respondent's obligation to pay a specific sum to Bank 1 and the continuation of existing orders regarding mortgage payments for Property A. The applicants sought various orders, and the respondent had also filed a response.

The court was required to determine whether the respondent would comply with an order to pay $5,852.07 to Bank 1 by a specified date, and what consequences would follow a failure to do so. Additionally, the court needed to decide on the continuation of an order for the respondent to meet mortgage payments for Property A until a final decision was delivered. The court also addressed the payment of the applicant's costs and the consideration of evidence regarding the payment of rates for Property A.

Judge Terry ordered that the respondent pay $5,852.07 to Bank 1 by 5.00 pm on 26 March 2018, and provide proof of payment by 9.00 am on 27 March 2018. Failure to comply would result in immediate orders being made as sought by the applicant in their application filed on 24 January 2018. The existing order for the respondent to pay mortgage payments for Property A was continued until the final decision. The respondent was ordered to pay the applicant's costs of the application, fixed at $5,324.56, with the timeframe for payment to be determined in the final decision. Further consideration of the respondent's requested orders was adjourned pending the reserved decision. The court noted it would consider evidence of the applicant's payment of rates for Property A in the final property determination. The court indicated an intention to deliver a decision on both parenting and property matters by 13 April 2018.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The respondent shall pay the amount of $5,852.07 to Bank 1 by 5.00pm on 26 March 2018 and the respondent shall provide to the applicants’ solicitor evidence of payment by no later than 9.00am on 27 March 2018.

2.

If the respondent fails to pay the amount required by Order 1 then orders will forthwith be made in terms of Orders 2, 3 and 4 of the orders sought by the applicant in his application in a case filed on 24 January 2018.

3.

The existing order requiring the respondent to pay the mortgage payments in respect of the Property A property as they fall due continues to be in force until the final decision is delivered.

4.

The respondent shall pay the applicant’s costs of and incidental to the application in a case filed on 24 January 2018 fixed in the sum of $5,324.56 NOTING THAT the timeframe for which those costs are to be paid will be determined as part of the final decision concerning the property matter.

5.

Further consideration of the orders sought in the respondent’s response to the application in a case filed on 24 January 2018 is adjourned to delivery of the reserved decision.

6.

The applicant’s legal representative is granted liberty to apply to relist the matter should they consider it necessary to do so.

THE COURT NOTES THAT:

(A) The court will take into account in determining the property matter the evidence given today about the payment of rates by the applicant in respect of the Property A property NOTING THAT the respondent is of the view that she was not responsible for the payment of the rates and this issue will also be considered in the final decision.

(B) The court has informed the parties that it will use its best endeavours to ensure that a decision is handed down in relation to the parenting and property matter by 13 April 2018.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.