Gaba v Minister for Immigration
[2015] FCCA 1687
•18 June 2015
FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| GABA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & ANOR | [2015] FCCA 1687 |
| Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Costs. |
| Applicant: | SAHIL GABA |
| First Respondent: | MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & BORDER PROTECTION |
| Second Respondent: | MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL |
| File Number: | SYG 1344 of 2015 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Street |
| Hearing date: | 18 June 2015 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 18 June 2015 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 18 June 2015 |
REPRESENTATION
| No appearance by the applicant |
| Solicitors for the Respondents: | Ms E. Warner-Knight Australian Government Solicitor |
ORDERS
The applicant pay the first respondent’s costs fixed in the sum of $1367.
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT AT SYDNEY |
SYG 1344 of 2015
| SAHIL GABA |
Applicant
And
| MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & BORDER PROTECTION |
First Respondent
| MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
In the matter of Gaba, matter number 13, the Court notes that the applicant has filed a notice of discontinuance. The respondent has moved for an order for costs in respect of the notice of discontinuance, consistent with the Rules. As the notice of discontinuance was not filed pursuant to consent orders that provided for each party to bear its own costs the first respondent is entitled to its costs.
I certify that the preceding one (1) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Judge Street
Associate:
Date: 30 June 2015
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Immigration
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Costs
-
Procedural Fairness
0
0
0