Futuris Industrial Products P/L v Arrow Industries P/L

Case [1994] FCA 967

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

Sorry, that's a 500

Details

AGLC: Futuris Industrial Products P/L v. Arrow Industries P/L & Anor [1994] FCA 967
Case: [1994] FCA 967
Decision Date: 13 DECEMBER 1994

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Most Recent Citation

Quall v Northern Territory of Australia [2011] FCA 1441

Cases Citing This Decision

Stuart v State of South Australia (Oodnadatta Common Overlap Proceeding) (No 2) [2021] FCA 194
Citation 1 (Para 25)

…determination of native title (referring to Dale v Western Australia [2011] FCAFC 46, (2011) 191 FCR 521 at [92]; and to Wik Peoples v Queensland [1994] FCA 967, (1994) 49 FCR 1 at [8]‑[19]). Counsel also referred to the uncertainty as to the effect of a positive determination of native title on other interests i…
Heffernan v Ibell [2016] QDC 154
Citation 2 (Para 1)

…See also The Wik Peoples v Queensland & Ors [1994] FCA 967; (1994) 120 ALR 465, at [8], in the context of the finality of a native title determination, in respect of such determinations being “judgments in rem”.…
Quall v Northern Territory of Australia [2011] FCA 1441
Citation 3 (Para 14)

…etermination made concerning the area will bind the world at large. It is, in effect, a judgment in rem: see Wik Peoples v Queensland [1994] FCA 967; (1994) 49 FCR 1. The determination will bind persons beyond parties to the proceedings. Because of the special characteristics of a judgment in rem, it operates out…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

AI Chat isn't available for this judgment.