FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| FURLONG v AUSTRALIAN WORKERS UNION & ORS | [2007] FMCA 443 |
| INDUSTRIAL LAW – Application for imposition of penalties – unlawful strike – agreed facts – contrition and early co-operation of respondents – consideration of matters relevant to penalty. |
| Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005, s.38 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth), Part XA |
| CPSU v Telstra Corporation (2001) 108 IR 228 CFMEU v Coal and Allied Operations Pty Limited Number 2 (1999) 94 IR 231 TPC v CSR Limited (1991) ATPR 52 Minister for Industry, Tourism and Resources v Mobil Oil Australia Pty Limited (2004) FCAFC 72 NW Frozen Foods Pty Limited v ACCC (1996) 71 FCR 285. |
| Applicant: | MURRAY FURLONG |
| First Respondent: | AUSTRALIAN WORKERS UNION |
| Second Respondent: | TERRY LEE |
| Third Respondent: | DOUGLAS BROWN |
| Fourth Respondent: | PETER LAMBE |
| Fifth Respondent: | GREG WATKINS |
| File number: | MLG 1320 of 2006 |
| Judgment of: | Burchardt FM |
| Hearing date: | 19 March 2007 |
| Date of last submission: | 19 March 2007 |
| Delivered at: | Melbourne |
| Delivered on: | 19 April 2007 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Mr P. O’Grady |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Australian Government Solicitor |
| Counsel for the Respondents: | Mr C. Dowling |
| Solicitors for the Respondents: | Ms S. Hodgers, Australian Workers’ Union |
ORDERS
That the following penalties be imposed:
(a)on the AWU,
(i)subject to the following sub-paragraph, a penalty of $40,000.00 in respect of the contraventions of s.38 of the BCII Act and s.178 of the WR Act, such penalty to be paid into the Consolidated Revenue Fund;
(ii)the AWU is not obliged to pay one half of the said penalty if for a period of 6 months from the date of trial in this proceeding, it has not been adjudged to have breached any provision of the BCII Act or the WR Act in so far that those breaches relate to the building and construction industry;
(b)on Mr Lee,
(i)a penalty of $4,000.00 in respect of the contraventions of s.38 of the BCII Act, such penalty to be paid into the Consolidated Revenue Fund;
(c)on Mr Brown,
(i)a penalty of $4,000.00 in respect of the contraventions of s.38 of the BCII Act and s.178 of the WR Act, such penalty to be paid into the Consolidated Revenue Fund;
(d)on Mr Lambe,
(i)a penalty of $4,000.00 in respect of the contraventions of s.38 of the BCII Act and s.178 of the WR Act, such penalty to be paid into the Consolidated Revenue Fund;
(e)on Mr Watkins,
(i)a penalty of $4,000.00 in respect of the contraventions of s.38 of the BCII Act and s.178 of the WR Act, such penalty to be paid into the Consolidated Revenue Fund.
FEDERAL MAGISTRATES |
MLG1320 of 2006
| MURRAY FURLONG |
Applicant
And
| AUSTRALIAN WORKERS UNION |
First Respondent
| TERRY LEE |
Second Respondent
| DOUGLAS BROWN |
Third Respondent
| PETER LAMBE |
Fourth Respondent
| GREG WATKINS |
Fifth Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
By an application filed on 20 October 2006 the Applicant seeks orders imposing penalties upon the Five Respondents. The First…
Continue reading Furlong v AWU & Ors
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Furlong v AWU & Ors [2007] FMCA 443
- Case
- [2007] FMCA 443
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the defendants had indeed contravened sections 38 of the BCII Act and section 178 of the WR Act and, if so, what penalties should be imposed. The court had to consider the evidence presented regarding the actions of the AWU and the individuals, including their roles and the nature of their involvement in the alleged contraventions. Additionally, the court examined the relevant provisions of the BCII Act and the WR Act to determine the appropriate sanctions.
In delivering the judgment, the court found that the AWU and the individuals had contravened the specified sections of the Acts. The court concluded that the penalties should be proportionate to the severity and impact of the contraventions. The AWU was subjected to a penalty of $40,000, with the condition that it would not need to pay half of this amount if it did not commit further breaches within six months. Each of the individuals was fined $4,000, with the specific provisions they contravened taken into account. The court's reasoning was grounded in the need to deter future breaches and to ensure compliance with the regulatory framework governing the building and construction industry.
The final orders of the court mandated the payment of the specified penalties into the Consolidated Revenue Fund by the AWU and the individuals, with the conditions and timelines as outlined in the judgment. This decision underscores the importance of adherence to statutory provisions within the building and construction industry and the court's role in enforcing these laws to maintain regulatory standards.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
That the following penalties be imposed:
(a) on the AWU,
(i) subject to the following sub-paragraph, a penalty of $40,000.00 in respect of the contraventions of s.38 of the BCII Act and s.178 of the WR Act, such penalty to be paid into the Consolidated Revenue Fund;
(ii) the AWU is not obliged to pay one half of the said penalty if for a period of 6 months from the date of trial in this proceeding, it has not been adjudged to have breached any provision of the BCII Act or the WR Act in so far that those breaches relate to the building and construction industry;
(b) on Mr Lee,
(i) a penalty of $4,000.00 in respect of the contraventions of s.38 of the BCII Act, such penalty to be paid into the Consolidated Revenue Fund;
(c) on Mr Brown,
(i) a penalty of $4,000.00 in respect of the contraventions of s.38 of the BCII Act and s.178 of the WR Act, such penalty to be paid into the Consolidated Revenue Fund;
(d) on Mr Lambe,
(i) a penalty of $4,000.00 in respect of the contraventions of s.38 of the BCII Act and s.178 of the WR Act, such penalty to be paid into the Consolidated Revenue Fund;
(e) on Mr Watkins,
(i) a penalty of $4,000.00 in respect of the contraventions of s.38 of the BCII Act and s.178 of the WR Act, such penalty to be paid into the Consolidated Revenue Fund.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.