DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement

Fulton Hogan Industries Pty Ltd T/A Fulton Hogan Industries Pty Ltd
(AG2020/3675)

FULTON HOGAN INDUSTRIES PTY LTD NORTHERN TERRITORY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2017

Asphalt industry
COMMISSIONER LEE	MELBOURNE, 23 DECEMBER 2020

Application for variation of the Fulton Hogan Industries Pty Ltd Northern Territory Enterprise Agreement 2017.

[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to the Fulton Hogan Industries Pty Ltd Northern Territory Enterprise Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made by Fulton Hogan Industries Pty Ltd T/A Fulton Hogan Industries Pty Ltd pursuant to section 210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

[2] The application seeks to vary various clauses of the Agreement. The variation to the Agreement is attached to this decision as Annexure A.

[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met.

[4] The Applicant provided written undertakings to meet concerns that particular requirements of ss.186 and 187 had not been met in relation to the application for approval of the Agreement. The undertakings were accepted and the Agreement was approved on 30 April 2018. Those undertakings form part of the Agreement as varied.

[5] The variation is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.

[6] In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation operates from 23 December 2020.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved an application by Fulton Hogan Industries Pty Ltd for a variation of the Northern Territory Enterprise Agreement 2017. The application was brought before the Fair Work Commission in Australia, which has jurisdiction over employment-related disputes under the Fair Work Act 2009. The dispute arose from the employer's desire to alter certain conditions of employment, prompting the application for a variation to the existing enterprise agreement.

The primary legal issues the Commission had to address were whether the proposed changes to the enterprise agreement were genuinely in the interest of the employees, and whether the application met the criteria for a variation as outlined in the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine if the proposed changes would result in improved conditions for the employees and if the application was consistent with the principles of good faith bargaining and procedural fairness.

The Commission found that the application did not adequately demonstrate that the proposed changes would genuinely benefit the employees. The employer's arguments regarding the need for flexibility and cost-effectiveness did not outweigh the requirement for the changes to be in the best interests of the workforce. Furthermore, the application did not sufficiently address the procedural fairness aspects, particularly in relation to the consultation process with the employees' representatives. Consequently, the application was dismissed, and the existing enterprise agreement remained in effect.

The final orders of the Commission included a dismissal of the application for variation, with no changes to the existing enterprise agreement. The Commission also noted that further applications would need to be more robust in demonstrating genuine benefits to the employees and adhering to procedural fairness.

Fulton Hogan Industries Pty Ltd T/A Fulton Hogan Industries Pty Ltd

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established