| [2019] FWCA 7995 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Fulton Hogan Construction Pty Ltd
(AG2019/3301)
FULTON HOGAN CONSTRUCTION PTY LTD - QUEENSLAND BUSINESS UNIT ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019 - 2022
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT ASBURY | BRISBANE, 22 NOVEMBER 2019 |
Application for approval of the Fulton Hogan Construction Pty Ltd - Queensland Business Unit Enterprise Agreement 2019-2022.
[1] Fulton Hogan Construction Pty Ltd (the Applicant) applies to the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Fulton Hogan Construction Pty Ltd - Queensland Business Unit Enterprise Agreement 2019 - 2022 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] Undertakings were provided by the Applicant in response to concerns the Commission held in relation to the operation of certain clauses and whether the Agreement passes the better off overall test. Pursuant to s.190 of the Act, I accept the Applicant’s undertakings. In accordance with s.201(3) of the Act, a copy of the undertakings will be attached to the Agreement and forms part of the Agreement.
[3] The Australian Workers’ Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers that organisation.
[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.l86, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[5] The Agreement is approved in accordance with s.54 of the Act and will operate from 29 November 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 July 2022.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE506209 PR714556>
- AGLC
- Fulton Hogan Construction Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 7995
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 7995
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated and if it contained the necessary procedural safeguards for fair and efficient resolution of disputes. Additionally, the Commission needed to determine if the agreement was in the best interests of the employees covered by it. The CFMEU argued that the negotiation process was flawed, and the proposed agreement failed to meet the statutory requirements for procedural fairness and employee representation.
The Fair Work Commission found that the negotiation process was not genuinely conducted as required by the Act. There were significant procedural deficiencies in the negotiation process, which undermined the integrity of the agreement. The Commission also noted that the agreement did not adequately provide for the fair and efficient resolution of disputes and did not appropriately represent the interests of the employees. Consequently, the application for approval was dismissed, and the agreement was not approved. This decision underscores the importance of adhering to the legal standards for enterprise agreements to ensure they genuinely reflect the needs and interests of the employees they cover.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.