Fulton Hogan Construction Pty Ltd

Case

[2020] FWCA 3224

19 JUNE 2020

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2020] FWCA 3224
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.225 - Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

Fulton Hogan Construction Pty Ltd
(AG2020/1724)

FULTON HOGAN CENTRAL REGION CIVIL CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER SPENCER

BRISBANE, 19 JUNE 2020

Application for termination of the Fulton Hogan Central Region Civil Construction Enterprise Agreement 2014.

[1] An application pursuant to s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) was made by Fulton Hogan Construction Pty Ltd (the Applicant) to terminate the Fulton Hogan Central Region Civil Construction Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement).

[2] The Agreement is an enterprise agreement that has passed its nominal expiry date. The nominal expiry date for the Agreement was 30 September 2017.

[3] Further, ss.225 and 226 of the FW Act relevantly provide:

225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:

(a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;

(b) an employee covered by the agreement;

(c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.

226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement

If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:

(a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and

(b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:

(i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and

(ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.”

[4] Ms Cherie Ellis, Human Resources Manager for the Applicant, filed a Form 24C Statutory Declaration in support of the application to terminate the Agreement. Ms Ellis stated that the Applicant sought the termination of the Agreement on the basis that the Company does not have any employees.

[5] Ms Ellis stated that the Agreement is no longer relevant for the civil construction sector in South Australia and the Northern Territory. She stated that the wage structures and employment terms in the Agreement did not reflect the contemporary wage market for the regions covered by the Agreement. Ms Ellis further stated that the Agreement may restrict the ability of the contractor to secure work and employment opportunities for the future.

[6] Ms Ellis confirmed in her statutory declaration that the Applicant does not have any employees covered by this Agreement and therefore the termination would not have any effect on any employees nor would the termination be contrary to the public interest. Ms Ellis stated that the termination of the Agreement would allow the Company to continue to operate and offer employment in the currently strained market and allow them to compete with more cost-effective labour arrangements of market competitors.

[7] Ms Ellis confirmed that employees engaged by the Applicant in the future will be employed under the Building and Construction General On-site Award 2010 (the Award) until such a time that a replacement Enterprise Agreement can be negotiated.

[8] Taking into account the information provided in response to the matters in s.226 of the Act, and in accordance with the above submissions, the material satisfies the legislative requirements that the termination of the Agreement is appropriate. The termination will take effect from 19 June 2020.

[9] I Order accordingly

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE412116  PR720339>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0