Legal Research
Cases
Fuat v OneSteel Ltd

Fuat v OneSteel Ltd

Case [2010] VCC 584

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Fuat v OneSteel Ltd [2010] VCC 584
Case: [2010] VCC 584
Decision Date: 10 June 2010

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Fuat v OneSteel Ltd [2010] VCC 584

Most Recent Citation

Lloyd v PFD Food Services (Melb) Pty Ltd [2016] VCC 1863

Cases Citing This Decision

McKenzie v Healthscope Operations Pty Ltd [2020] VSC 217
Citation 1 (Para 1)

…a Pty Ltd and Turner v Clinical Laboratories Pty Ltd .[4] His Honour considered these authorities to be distinguishable.[5] [4] Fuat v OneSteel Ltd [2010] VCC 584 (‘ Fuat ’); Filipovski v Tandem Australia Pty Ltd [2016] VMC 3 (‘ Filipovski ’); Turner v Clinical Laboratories Pty Ltd [2016] VMC 9 (‘ Turner ’). [5]H…
Derks v CSR Virdian Ltd [2019] VMC 6
Citation 2

…s regard. Those documents include Fuat v OneSteel [2010] VCC 584, Turner v Clinical Labs [2016] VMC 9, Breen v VWA [2012] VMC 21, Bucic v Arnej [2014] VMC 17, Zubic v PPG [2016] VMC 10, Bunney v Ryan Moves (MCV, Magistrate Saines, del. 5 April 2013) and Ozbilgi v Bradnams [2011] VSCA 210. 49In Ozbilgi the discuss…
Turner v Clinical Laboratories [2016] VMC 9
Citation 3

…[4] [2010] VCC 584…
Filipovski v Tandem Australia Pty Ltd [2016] VMC 3
Citation 4

…27 As for accord and satisfaction, she referred to two County Court decisions, Fuat v Onesteel Limited [2010] VCC 584 (per Judge Bowman) and Warren v Jennifer A Yates Pty Ltd [2006] VCC 1780 (per Judge Dyett). Both judges determined that the defence of accord and satisfaction could only relate to the period in re…
Bucic v Arnej [2014] VMC 17
Citation 5

…el. 26 October 2006). 40.County Court decisions referred to by Counsel include Fuat v.Onesteel ([2010] VCC 584, per Judge Bowman) and Warren v. Yates ([2006] VCC 1780, per Judge Dyett). The Supreme Court decisions referred to were Derks v. R & J Fibreglass ([2009] VSC 601), AMP v. Chalkley ([1998] VSC 290 and Ozb…
Lloyd v PFD Food Services (Melb) Pty Ltd [2016] VCC 1863
Citation 6

…101 There are marked differences between the situation in the present case and that in Fuat v One Steel Ltd [2010] VCC 584. In the present case, there is no evidence of a deterioration in the plaintiff’s condition or any incapacity flowing from it. In the present case, there has been no change which would entitle…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 45
Citation 1

…ere should be an end to litigation. I am conscious of the observations made, for example, by Murphy J in Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589 at 605 as follows: “These notions of res judicata and issue estoppel are founded on the necessity, if there is to be an orderly administration of jus…
Derks v R and J Fibreglass Pty Ltd [2009] VSC 601
Citation 2

…ongoing liability to make weekly payments. 35 Reference is also made to the decision of the Supreme Court in Derks v R J Fibreglass Pty Ltd [2009] VSC 601.…
AMP Workers Compensation Services Ltd v Chalkley [1998] VSC 29
Citation 3

…dismissal of his claim. Reference is made to the decision of the Supreme Court in the matter of AMP Workers Compensation Services Ltd v Chalkley [1998] VSC 29. The plaintiff is not estopped. He is entitled to have the opportunity of attempting to establish that there has been a change in the prevailing circumst…

AI Chat coming soon