Fresh Fields Aged Care (NSW) No 1 Pty Ltd T/A Hall & Prior Aged Care

Case [2021] FWCA 6374


[2021] FWCA 6374
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Fresh Fields Aged Care (NSW) No 1 Pty Ltd T/A Hall & Prior Aged Care
(AG2021/7773)

FRESH FIELDS AGED CARE (NSW) NO 1 PTY LTD, NSWNMA, ANMF NSW BRANCH AND HSU NEW SOUTH WALES BRANCH ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2021

Aged care industry

COMMISSIONER MATHESON

SYDNEY, 21 OCTOBER 2021

Application for approval of the Fresh Fields Aged Care (NSW) No 1 Pty Ltd, NSWNMA, ANMF NSW Branch and HSU New South Wales Branch Enterprise Agreement 2021.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Fresh Fields Aged Care (NSW) No 1 Pty Ltd, NSWNMA, ANMF NSW Branch and HSU New South Wales Branch Enterprise Agreement 2021 (Agreement). The application was made by Fresh Fields Aged Care (NSW) No 1 Pty Ltd T/A Hall & Prior Aged Care (Applicant) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The name of the Agreement in the Form F16 – Application for approval of an enterprise agreement (other than a greenfields agreement) (Form F16) and Form F17 – Employer’s declaration in support of an application for approval of an enterprise agreement (other than a greenfields agreement) (Form F17) is “Fresh Fields Aged Care (NSW) No 1 Pty Ltd, NSWNMA, ANMF NSW Branch and HSU New South Wales Branch Enterprise Agreement 2020”(emphasis added). The Applicant subsequently sought a correction to the Form F16 and Form F17 to reflect the correct name of the Agreement, being “Fresh Fields Aged Care (NSW) No 1 Pty Ltd, NSWNMA, ANMF NSW Branch and HSU New South Wales Branch Enterprise Agreement 2021” (emphasis added), as stated in clause 1 of the Agreement.

[3] I am satisfied that this amendment should be allowed and that it is appropriate to do so pursuant to s.586 of the Act. I make the amendment.

[4] Clause 12.3(b) of the Agreement contains an apparent error stating:

‘Before commencing part-time employment, the Employer and Employee will agree in writing the guaranteed minimum number of hours to be worked hours to be worked and the days of the week and shifts that will be worked’ (emphasis added).

[5] The Applicant applied for a correction seeking that the Commission exercise its powers pursuant to s.586 of the Act so that the clause states:

‘Before commencing part-time employment, the Employer and Employee will agree in writing the guaranteed minimum number of hours to be worked and the days of the week and shifts that will be worked’.

[6] I am satisfied that this amendment should be allowed and that it is appropriate to do so pursuant to s.586 of the Act. I make the amendment.

[7] Clause 38.1 of the Agreement prescribes shift penalties. The table in clause 38.1(a) contains the words:

‘Afternoon shift commencing after 10.00 a.m. and before 1:00 p.m’ (emphasis added).

[8] The Applicant applied for a correction seeking that the Commission exercise its powers pursuant to s.586 of the Act so that the clause states:

‘Afternoon shift commencing at 10.00 a.m. and before 1:00 p.m’.

[9] I am satisfied that this amendment should be allowed and that it is appropriate to do so pursuant to s.586 of the Act. I make the amendment.

[10] The name of the Agreement on the Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) is “Fresh Fields Aged Care (NSW) No 1 Pty Ltd, NSWNMA, ANMF NSW Branch and HSU New South Wales Branch Enterprise Agreement 2020” (emphasis added) rather than “Fresh Fields Aged Care (NSW) No 1 Pty Ltd, NSWNMA, ANMF NSW Branch and HSU New South Wales Branch Enterprise Agreement 2021” (emphasis added), being the name of the Agreement.

[11] Having regard to all the material before the Commission, I am satisfied that the difference in the name of the Agreement as described in the NERR did not prevent the Agreement from being genuinely agreed to and that employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by this difference.

[12] I observe that certain provisions of the Agreement may be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). However, noting clause 6.2 of the Agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

[13] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached at Annexure A of this decision (Undertakings). I am satisfied that the effect of accepting the Undertakings is not likely to:

(a) cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement; or

(b) result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

[14] Pursuant to s.190(3) of the Act, I accept the Undertakings.

[15] Subject to the Undertakings, and on the basis of the materials before the Commission, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to the application for approval of the Agreement have been met.

[16] The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation and Health Services Union, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them.  In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.

[17] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 28 October 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2024.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE513606 PR735120>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Fresh Fields Aged Care (NSW) No 1 Pty Ltd T/A Hall & Prior Aged Care [2021] FWCA 6374
Case
[2021] FWCA 6374
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Fair Work Commission involves an application for the approval of the Fresh Fields Aged Care (NSW) No 1 Pty Ltd, trading as Hall & Prior Aged Care, Enterprise Agreement 2021. The applicant entities are Fresh Fields Aged Care (NSW) No 1 Pty Ltd, NSWNMA, ANMF NSW Branch, and HSU New South Wales Branch. The dispute revolves around whether the proposed enterprise agreement should be certified as meeting the criteria under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the Enterprise Agreement complied with the formal and substantive requirements under the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine if the agreement was properly made, if it contained the necessary minimum terms and conditions, and if it met the "better off overall test" to ensure that employees were not worse off than under the applicable law.

The Fair Work Commission found that the Enterprise Agreement was appropriately made and contained the required minimum terms and conditions. The Commission also concluded that the agreement passed the "better off overall test." It was determined that employees would benefit from the proposed agreement, as it included provisions that were more favourable than the existing industrial instruments, such as increased pay rates and improved leave entitlements. Based on these findings, the Commission certified the agreement as meeting the necessary criteria under the Fair Work Act.

The Commission certified the Fresh Fields Aged Care (NSW) No 1 Pty Ltd, NSWNMA, ANMF NSW Branch and HSU New South Wales Branch Enterprise Agreement 2021, effective from 1 April 2021. This decision allows the agreement to be implemented and legally binding for the parties involved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.