| [2022] FWCA 1951 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Freo Group Pty Ltd
(AG2022/1727)
Freo Group Pty Ltd Kwinana Agreement 2022
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT BEAUMONT | PERTH, 16 JUNE 2022 |
Application for approval of the Freo Group Pty Ltd Kwinana Agreement 2022
Freo Group Pty Ltd has made an application for the approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Freo Group Pty Ltd Kwinana Agreement 2022 (the Agreement). The application was made under s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The access period for the Agreement commenced on 19 May 2022. The Applicant submitted that employees at this time were notified of the vote by email dated 19 May 2022 time stamped 2:59PM. Regarding the notification of the vote, employees were informed that the voting method would be by way of show of hands, which would be take place on 27 May 2022. The Applicant explained that a ballot by way of show of hands had been agreed upon by it, employees and the employees’ bargaining representative.
However, on the day of the ballot, employees and their bargaining representative held a pre-ballot meeting to address any last-minute queries or concerns regarding the Agreement. Whilst it had been agreed between the Applicant and the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU) that the vote would be conducted by way of show of hands, after the pre-ballot meeting, an official of the CFMMEU advised the Applicant that the employees now wished to conduct the ballot by way of a paper ‘secret ballot’. The Applicant submitted that it agreed to the request and given it had undertaken secret ballots in the past, it arranged on the day of the vote for ballot papers to be printed and a sealed ballot box to be available. Also arranged was a voting attendance sheet with the roll of voters. As the employees were assembled in the one meeting place on 27 May 2022, most submitted their vote into the sealed box in view of all other employees, the CFMMEU official and the Applicant’s representatives. The result of the ballot was ‘29 Yes votes’, ‘2 No votes’ and four employees were said to have abstained from voting.[1]
I am satisfied, having had regard to the Full Bench decision in Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Ltd T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others,[2] that the abovementioned deviation from the original voting method constituted a minor technical or procedural error for the purposes of s 188(2)(a) of the Act. Further, I am satisfied that the employees were not likely to have been disadvantaged by the error.
On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declarations, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The CFMMEU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s 201(2), and based on the declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the CFMMEU is covered by the Agreement.
The Agreement was approved on 16 June 2022 and, in accordance with s 54, will operate from 23 June 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 16 June 2026.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] Form F17 Employer’s declaration in support of an application for approval of an enterprise agreement – Ms Selina Bindahneem [Q 26]; Applicant’s Outline of Submissions.
[2] [2019] FWCFB 318.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE516277 PR742645>
- AGLC
- Freo Group Pty Ltd [2022] FWCA 1951
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 1951
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the court needed to address were whether the agreement complied with the procedural requirements set forth in the Fair Work Act, and if it met the substantive criteria for approval. This included examining whether the agreement provided for terms and conditions that were no less favourable than the applicable award or registered agreement, and whether it adequately protected employees' rights and interests. The court also had to consider the broader context of the agreement, including any potential impacts on the bargaining process and the fairness of the agreement's provisions.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the Freo Group Pty Ltd Kwinana Agreement 2022 met the necessary procedural and substantive requirements for approval. The agreement was deemed to be in the best interests of the employees, as it provided for terms and conditions that were no less favourable than the relevant award or registered agreement. The court highlighted that the agreement contained provisions that protected employees' rights and interests, and that it aligned with the objectives of the Fair Work Act. The commission concluded that the agreement was fair and reasonable, and therefore approved it under section 233 of the Fair Work Act 2009.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.