[2014] FWCA 153 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Freo Group Limited
(AG2013/10258)
FREO GROUP LIMITED ROY HILL AWU GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2013
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 7 JANUARY 2014 |
Application for approval of the Freo Group Limited Roy Hill AWU Greenfields Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Freo Group Limited Roy Hill AWU Greenfields Agreement 2013 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by Freo Group Limited. The Agreement is a greenfields agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] I am satisfied that The Australian Workers’ Union, the employee organisation to be covered by the agreement, is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 7 January 2014 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 14 January 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 7 July 2014.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE406248 PR546557>
- AGLC
- Freo Group Limited [2014] FWCA 153
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 153
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission had to determine whether the agreement was a "better off overall" agreement and whether it included provisions that were contrary to public policy or not in the best interests of the employees. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement was fairly negotiated and whether it complied with the procedural requirements of the Act.
After considering the evidence and submissions from both parties, the Commission found that the agreement was a "better off overall" agreement and that it was fairly negotiated. The Commission also found that the agreement did not include any provisions that were contrary to public policy or not in the best interests of the employees. The Commission concluded that the agreement met all the requirements for approval under the Act and granted the application for approval. The agreement is now a legally binding enterprise agreement between Freo Group Limited and the AWU, covering the employees working at the Roy Hill mine.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.