Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: French v Bremner (No 2) [2020] NSWCA 211 Hearing dates: 4 September 2020 Decision date: 04 September 2020 Before: Basten JA Decision: (1) In relation to the motion filed by Mr French on 4 August 2020:
(a) Dismiss the motion.
(b) Order that the costs of the motion be costs in the cross-appeal.
(2) In relation to the motion filed by Ms Bakey on 4 August 2020:
(a) Dismiss the motion.
(b) Order that the second cross-respondent’s costs of the motion be her costs in the cross-appeal.
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – appeal and cross-appeal – failure to prosecute with due despatch – application to dismiss cross-appeal – non-compliance with directions for filing submissions – indulgences granted by extending dates – submissions filed by extended date – Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 12.7
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – appeal and cross-appeal – cross-appeal – procedural irregularity – notice of cross-appeal to commence proceedings against non-appellant – proceedings lacking in merit – whether frivolous, vexatious or an abuse of process – Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 13.4
Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 12.7, 13.4
Cases Cited: Chamberlain Group Pty Ltd v Kids for Life Academy Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 241
Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Andrew Boyd French (Appellant / First Cross-Respondent)
Christopher Bremner (Respondent / Cross-Appellant)
Gabrielle June Bakey (Second Cross-Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Appellant / First Cross-Respondent in person
Mr A Harding (First Respondent / Cross-Appellant))
Ms G Bakey in person (Second Cross-Respondent)
Applicant self-represented
Johnson Winter & Slattery (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2019/285092 Decision under appeal
- Court or tribunal:
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction:
- Equity – Commercial List
- Citation:
- Date of Decision:
- 15 August 2019
- Before:
- Parker J
- File Number(s):
- 2014/101136
Judgment
-
BASTEN JA: Over the years prior to 2014 the appellant, Andrew Boyd French, and the respondent, Christopher Bremner, were engaged in commercial activities which resulted in the purchase of a number of rural properties in Victoria and one in New South Wales. Proceedings commenced against Mr French by Provident Capital Ltd (Receivers and managers appointed) (In liq) in 2014 were resolved. However, a cross-claim brought by Mr French joined Dr Bremner in the proceedings. Dr Bremner then filed his own cross-claim against Mr French and against Mr French’s de facto partner, Gabrielle June Bakey. (One of the Victorian properties was registered in Ms Bakey’s name.)
-
Following a trial of the cross-claims in the Equity Division, Parker J dismissed all of Mr French’s claims and Dr Bremner’s cross-claims with respect to the properties, including the cross-claim against Ms Bakey. Otherwise, Dr Bremner was successful in obtaining a judgment for repayment of a loan in an amount of $3.15 million, together with interest. Orders were made for the sale of the properties held in joint names.
-
On 15 November 2019 Mr French filed a notice…
Continue reading French v Bremner (No 2)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- French v Bremner (No 2) [2020] NSWCA 211
- Case
- [2020] NSWCA 211
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Court was required to determine whether the cross-appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution, specifically in light of the non-compliance with filing directions and the granting of indulgences by extending time. Additionally, the Court had to consider whether the notice of cross-appeal, which sought to commence proceedings against a non-appellant, was a procedural irregularity that rendered it frivolous, vexatious, or an abuse of process under rule 13.4 of the *Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005* (NSW).
Basten JA, in his decision, dismissed the motion to dismiss the cross-appeal, indicating that the indulgences granted for filing submissions were sufficient. The Court also dismissed the motion to strike out the notice of cross-appeal. The costs associated with both motions were ordered to be costs in the cross-appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) In relation to the motion filed by Mr French on 4 August 2020:
(a) Dismiss the motion.
(b) Order that the costs of the motion be costs in the cross-appeal.
(2) In relation to the motion filed by Ms Bakey on 4 August 2020:
(a) Dismiss the motion.
(b) Order that the second cross-respondent’s costs of the motion be her costs in the cross-appeal.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.