Fredon Industries Pty Ltd v Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia

Case

[2016] FWC 2529

20 April 2016

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2016] FWC 2529

INTERIM DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.418 - Application for an order that industrial action by employees or employers stop etc.

Fredon Industries Pty Ltd T/A Fredon

v

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal,

Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia

(C2016/3415)

COMMISSIONER RIORDAN SYDNEY, 20 APRIL 2016

s.418 - Application for an order that industrial action by employees or employers stop etc.

[1]        This decision relates to an application by Fredon Industries Pty Ltd (Fredon) in

accordance with section 418 of the Fair Work Act, 2009 (the Act) to stop the

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied

Services Union of Australia (CEPU) from taking industrial action, by way of a 48 hour strike,

effective from 12.01am on Thursday, 21 April 2016.

[2]        Leave was granted in accordance with section 596(2) of the Act to allow Fredon to be

represented by Mr G. Boyce of Counsel. The CEPU was represented by Mr O. Fagir of

Counsel and Mr J. Kennedy from Hall Payne Lawyers.

1

[3] Witness statements were attested by Mr A. Blachura , the NSW Electrical Division

2

General Manager of Fredon and Mr D. McKinley an Assistant Secretary of the CEPU.

[4]        For the record, I am a former Officer of the CEPU and a former Chairman of the

Electro Group Training Company. Mr previous work experience is well known to the parties.

Neither party made application for me to excuse myself in relation to this application.

[5]        The principal issue in relation to this application is that the impending industrial action

is not “employee claim action” in accordance with section 409(1)(a) of the Act;

“409 Employee claim action

Employee claim action

(1) Employee claim action for a proposed enterprise agreement is industrial action

that:

(a) is organised or engaged in for the purpose of supporting or advancing claims in

relation to the agreement that are only about, or are reasonably believed to only be

3

about, permitted matters.

[2016] FWC 2529

[6]        There is no dispute that the CEPU and Fredon have been involved in enterprise

bargaining over the past few months. There is no dispute that the proposed industrial action

has been authorised by a protected action ballot.

[7]        There is no suggestion that the CEPU is engaging in pattern bargaining with Fredon.

[8]        Mr Blachura submitted that the proposed action is unprotected action because the

CEPU is trying to regulate the wages and conditions of apprentices who are employed

through a third party, namely, a group training company. Annexure 2 of Exhibit F1 is an

email from Mr McKinley to Mr Blachura which contained the following comments:

“From: Dave McKinley

Sent: Thursday, 14 April 2016 24:41pm

To: Andrew Blachura

Cc: Stewart Edward; Fred Barbin; Steve Banks

Subject: ETU Position

Andrew

The following is the position the members of Fredon have endorsed as their final

claim:

Delegates Rights Clause

Supplementary Labour Clause requiring the company to ensure that any

supplementary labour employee is engaged on terms no less favourable than those

contained in the Fredon agreement

Apprentice Clause requiring the company to ensure that any apprentice engaged

through a group training company is engaged on terms no less favourable than

those contained in the Fredon agreement

All other conditions in current EBA rolled over except for wages which are outlined

4

below”

(my emphasis)

[9]        Relevantly, the wage schedules did not contain any rates of pay for apprentices.

[10]      Mr Fagir argued that Mr McKinley’s evidence should be regarded as being paramount

in this matter. Mr McKinley testified that he has concerns that if the rates of pay that are

currently paid to apprentices by Fredon revert down to the Modern Award rates, then the job

security of the Electricians and Trades Assistants directly employed by Fredon may be in

jeopardy on the basis of the flexibility of the classifications in the industry.

[11]      As a result, Mr Fagir argued that the evidence of Mr McKinley satisfies the

“reasonably believed” test of section 409 of the Act.

[12]      Mr Blachura makes no mention of any correlation between the job security of

employees and the rates of pay being paid to apprentices of group training company ever

being discussed during an EBA meeting. Under cross examination, Mr McKinley admitted

that he had not been at every meeting for the current EBA but recalled discussions in relation

to this issue during the negotiations of previous Agreements. Unfortunately, the CEPU
[2016] FWC 2529

Official who has had carriage of these negotiations is on leave and the Union’s delegate is

unwell and unavailable.

[13]      In my view, it would be premature for industrial action to occur if the parties had not

had the opportunity to discuss this issue.

[14]      It would be inappropriate to determine this application on the basis of the evidence

that is currently before the Commission. At this stage, such a determination would be at odds

with the overall objectives of the Act.

[15]      Section 420(2) of the Act, allows the Commission to issue interim orders. I am of the

view, that an interim order to stop the pending industrial action is the appropriate course of

action in this circumstance.

[16]      In accordance with section 420(2) of the Act, I hereby Order that the industrial action

planned for 12.01am on 21 April 2016 not proceed.

[17]      In accordance with s.420(5) of the Act the interim order will operate until the

application is determined.

[18]      I direct the parties to confer in relation to the job security concerns raised by Mr

McKinley.

[19]      The matter will be listed for further hearing and determination on 29 April 2016 at

9am.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR579327>

1

Exhibit F1 Witness Statement – Mr Andrew Blachura

2

Exhibit C1 Witness Statement – Mr Dave McKinley

3

Section 409(1)(a) – The Fair Work Act, 2009

4

Exhibit F1 – Annexure 2