SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION: Fraser v Fraser and Anor [2001] QSC 490 PARTIES: BRUCE WILLIAM FRASER
(applicant)
v
ELSIE JEAN LYNETTE FRASER and
CAMERON ARNOLD FRASER
(respondents)FILE NO/S: S 8421/01 DIVISION: Trial Division PROCEEDING: Application ORIGINATING COURT: Supreme Court
DELIVERED ON: 19 December 2001 DELIVERED AT: Brisbane HEARING DATE: 30 October 2001 JUDGE: Philippides J ORDER: 1. It is declared that, upon its proper construction, the condition stated in cl 3(b)(i) of the Will of John William Joseph Fraser deceased dated 1st June 1990, that Cameron Arnold Fraser transfer to Bruce William Fraser by way of gift his one-half share and interest in the property known as “Saltern Creek”, is not void for uncertainty.
2. It is ordered that each party’s costs of and incidental to the application be assessed on an indemnity basis and paid from the estate of John William Joseph Fraser, deceased.CATCHWORDS: WILLS – PROBATE AND LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION - construction and effect of testamentary disposition – uncertainty – condition subsequent – need for certainty in operation – condition that beneficiary transfer his interest in a specified property – whether condition uncertain as to time – whether reasonable period for performance can be implied – whether condition uncertain in operation because not capable of being fulfilled solely by the beneficiary
Clavering v Ellison (1859) 7 HL Cas 707
Davies v Lowndes (1835) 1 Bing NC 597
Huckstep v Mathews (1685) 1 Vern 362
Miller v Miller (1995) 16 ACSR 73
Morley v Rennoldson (1843) 2 Ha 570
Re Bradley [1994] 2 Qd R 233
Re Burton’s Settlements [1955] 1 Ch 82
Re Corr Unreported, S Ct of Qld, No 5712 of 1996, 15.8.96
Re Denley’s Trust Deed [1969] 1 Ch 373
Re Viscount Exmouth, Viscount Exmouth v Praed (1883) 23 Ch D 158
Watson v Watson [1999] NSWSC 325COUNSEL: G Gibson QC for applicant
D Mullins for respondentsSOLICITORS: Hunt & Hunt for applicant
McCullough Robertson for respondents
PHILIPPIDES J:
The issues raised by this application concern the validity of cl 3(b)(i) of the Will of John William Joseph Fraser, deceased, dated 1 June 1990.
The applicant, Bruce Fraser, is the eldest of two sons, the only children of the testator, John Fraser. The respondents are the applicant’s mother, Mrs Fraser and his brother, Cameron Fraser, each of whom (together with the applicant) are the executors and trustees appointed by the Will.
The testator was, and the applicant and his brother are, graziers at Barcaldine. Members of the family hold, and at all material times have held, interests in three grazing homestead leases at Barcaldine, namely “Bendigo”, “Culburnie” and “Saltern Creek”. In 1989, the lease of “Saltern Creek” was given to the sons, Bruce and Cameron Fraser, in equal shares. It is fenced into two approximately equal areas, each of which is operated by Bruce Fraser and Cameron Fraser respectively. The testator was the lessee of “Culburnie”, on which property he and Mrs Fraser resided and on which Mrs Fraser continues to…
Continue reading Fraser v Fraser
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Fraser v Fraser [2001] QSC 490
- Case
- [2001] QSC 490
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine whether the condition was uncertain as to time and if a reasonable period for performance could be implied. Additionally, the court had to consider whether the condition was uncertain in operation because it could not be fulfilled solely by the beneficiary. The court examined the language of the will and relevant legal principles to ascertain the testator's intentions.
The court found that the condition was not void for uncertainty. It held that the condition could be performed within a reasonable time, and the court could imply such a period if necessary. The court also determined that the condition was not uncertain in operation because it could be fulfilled by the beneficiary. Consequently, the court declared that the condition in the will was valid and enforceable.
The court further ordered that each party's costs of and incidental to the application be assessed on an indemnity basis and paid from the estate of John William Joseph Fraser, deceased.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. It is declared that, upon its proper construction, the condition stated in cl 3(b)(i) of the Will of John William Joseph Fraser deceased dated 1st June 1990, that Cameron Arnold Fraser transfer to Bruce William Fraser by way of gift his one-half share and interest in the property known as “Saltern Creek”, is not void for uncertainty.
2. It is ordered that each party’s costs of and incidental to the application be assessed on an indemnity basis and paid from the estate of John William Joseph Fraser, deceased.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.