Franchise Retail Brands Ltd v David Loh
Case
•
[2020] ATMO 26
•19 February 2020
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Franchise Retail Brands Ltd v David Loh [2020] ATMO 26
[2020] ATMO 26
19 February 2020
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an opposition by David Loh to an application by Franchise Retail Brands Limited to remove trade mark number 1483715, registered in classes 29, 30, 32, and 43. The opposition was brought under section 92 of the *Trade Marks Act 1995* (Cth).
The court was required to determine whether the grounds of opposition nominated by David Loh had been established. The onus was on the opponent to prove these grounds on the balance of probabilities.
The Hearing Officer found that the opponent had failed to establish any of the grounds of opposition. The application by Franchise Retail Brands Limited for trade mark number 2011489 was therefore permitted to proceed to registration one month from the date of the decision, unless an appeal was filed. Given that each party had achieved partial success, no order was made as to costs.
The court was required to determine whether the grounds of opposition nominated by David Loh had been established. The onus was on the opponent to prove these grounds on the balance of probabilities.
The Hearing Officer found that the opponent had failed to establish any of the grounds of opposition. The application by Franchise Retail Brands Limited for trade mark number 2011489 was therefore permitted to proceed to registration one month from the date of the decision, unless an appeal was filed. Given that each party had achieved partial success, no order was made as to costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Commercial Law
-
Intellectual Property
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
16
Statutory Material Cited
0
Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network GP
[2010] FCAFC 58
Kicking Horse Coffee Co. Ltd
[2018] ATMO 193