FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Fortrend Securities Pty Ltd v Wollermann (No 3) [2025] FCA 444
File number(s): VID 38 of 2023 Judgment of: O’CALLAGHAN J Date of judgment: 6 May 2025 Catchwords: COSTS – where respondents were entirely successful following 15-day trial – where respondents previously made two offers to settle the proceeding by which respondents would have paid to applicants substantial sums of money and their costs – where both offers not accepted – whether offers unreasonably refused – held: applicants liable to pay respondents’ costs on a party-party basis up to a date determined under r 25.14(2) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) by reference to the date of the first offer and thereafter on an indemnity basis Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 182(1) and 183(1)
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43
Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Pt 25, r 25.14(2)
Cases cited: Anchorage Capital Partners Pty Limited v ACPA Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 112
Fortrend Securities Pty Ltd v Wollermann (No 2) [2025] FCA 96
Re Wilcox; Ex parte Venture Industries Pty Ltd (No 2) (1996) 72 FCR 151
Division: General Division Registry: Victoria National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance Number of paragraphs: 42 Date of last submission/s: 13 March 2025 Date of hearing: Determined on the papers Solicitor for the Applicants: Cornwalls Counsel for the Respondents: P Crutchfield KC and L Merrick KC with T Burn-Francis Solicitor for the Respondents: Seyfarth Shaw ORDERS
VID 38 of 2023 BETWEEN: FORTREND SECURITIES PTY LTD ACN 055 702 693
First Applicant
JOSEPH BURKE FORSTER
Second ApplicantFORTREND SECURITIES INC
Third ApplicantAND: CHRISTOPHER JAMES WOLLERMANN
First Respondent
STEPHEN MATTHEW LYLE
Second RespondentSHAW AND PARTNERS LIMITED
Third RespondentLWAM PTY LTD
Fourth RespondentALTA VIA PTY LTD
Fifth RespondentGROLLA PTY LTD
Sixth Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
O’CALLAGHAN J
DATE OF ORDER:
6 MAY 2025
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The applicants pay the respondents’ costs of the proceeding:
(a)before 11am on 3 October 2023 — on a party and party basis; and
(b)thereafter — on an indemnity basis.
2.The costs in order 1 be paid as a lump sum.
3.The calculation of the lump sum be referred to a registrar of this court to fix the amount of the lump sum payable, and:
(a)within 28 days of the date of this order, the respondents file and serve any costs summary and submissions in accordance with the Costs Practice Note (GPN-COSTS);
(b)within 28 days of service of the respondents’ costs summary and submissions, the applicants file and serve any costs response and submissions in accordance with the Costs Practice Note; and
(c)pursuant to r 1.37 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), the registrar determine the quantum of costs in any referred costs dispute in such manner as they think fit (including, if thought appropriate, on the papers) and, within two weeks of the making of the determination, make orders for the payment of the amounts…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Fortrend Securities Pty Ltd v Wollermann (No 3) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2025] FCA 444
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the circumstances surrounding the settlement offers and the applicants' reasons for rejecting them. It considered whether the applicants had a reasonable basis for their refusal and whether there were any mitigating factors that could justify their decision not to accept the settlement offers. The court found that the applicants had not provided sufficient justification for their refusal and that the offers were reasonable under the circumstances. Therefore, the applicants were held liable for the respondents' costs on a party-party basis up to a date determined by reference to the date of the first offer, and thereafter on an indemnity basis.
In conclusion, the court ordered that the applicants pay the respondents' costs of the proceeding before a specified date on a party-party basis and thereafter on an indemnity basis. The calculation of the lump sum for these costs was to be referred to a registrar of the court. The respondents were required to file and serve their costs summary and submissions within 28 days, and the applicants were to respond within 28 days of the service of the respondents' submissions. The registrar was tasked with determining the quantum of costs in any referred dispute and making orders for payment within two weeks of the determination.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The applicants pay the respondents’ costs of the proceeding:
(a) before 11am on 3 October 2023 — on a party and party basis; and
(b) thereafter — on an indemnity basis.
2. The costs in order 1 be paid as a lump sum.
3. The calculation of the lump sum be referred to a registrar of this court to fix the amount of the lump sum payable, and:
(a) within 28 days of the date of this order, the respondents file and serve any costs summary and submissions in accordance with the Costs Practice Note (GPN-COSTS);
(b) within 28 days of service of the respondents’ costs summary and submissions, the applicants file and serve any costs response and submissions in accordance with the Costs Practice Note; and
(c) pursuant to r 1.37 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), the registrar determine the quantum of costs in any referred costs dispute in such manner as they think fit (including, if thought appropriate, on the papers) and, within two weeks of the making of the determination, make orders for the payment of the amounts so determined.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.