Formston v Pittwater Council

Link copied
Case Copied 76 min read

Land and Environment Court


of New South Wales


CITATION: Formston v Pittwater Council [2004] NSWLEC 50
PARTIES:

APPLICANTS
Katie Formston, Helen Kaminski, John MacRae and Pat MacRae

RESPONDENT
Pittwater Council

FILE NUMBER(S): 10319 of 2004
CORAM: Nott C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Subdivision of steep land into four lots - size of lots - subject to slip - means of vehicular access - pedestrian access via an inclinator - removal of trees - visual impact - bushfire threat - threatened species
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 97
CASES CITED:
DATES OF HEARING: 3-7 November 2003
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/23/2004
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:


APPLICANTS
Mr C J Leggat, barrister
SOLICITORS
Wilshire Webb

RESONDENT
Ms H P Irish, barrister
SOLICITORS
Malleson Stephen Jaques



JUDGMENT:


    IN THE LAND AND
    ENVIRONMENT COURT
    OF NEW SOUTH WALES

    10319 of 2003
    Nott C
    23 February 2004

    Katie Formston, Helen Kaminski, John MacRae and Pat MacRae
    Applicants
    v
    Pittwater Council
    Respondent

    Reasons for Judgment


    Overview

    1 . In this appeal, the applicants seek consent for an amended development application comprising:
      (1) a four-lot subdivision of a steep parcel of land presently containing three lots at Nos 29, 31 and 33 Bakers Road, Church Point;
      (2) the erection of a house on new lot 4 (to be known as No 29A);
      (3) the provision of three double garages and a visitor carparking space in what might be called a carparking court towards the lower level of the subject land; and
      (4) the construction of a long inclinator (with its waiting stations or platforms) and a stairway , to give pedestrian access from the carparking court to three of the proposed lots on the higher part of the subject land.

    2 . An earlier version of the development application had been recommended for refusal by a council town planner and by the council’s development unit. The council’s environment and planning committee resolved to refuse the application on 1 September 2003.

    3 . The current amended plan of the proposed subdivision is dated 31 October 2003 (ex E) and is reproduced at par 26 below. Details of the proposed house, carparking court, access, inclinator and stairway, and of the erosion and concept stormwater controls can be seen in the amended architectural DA plans 02E and 03C (ex B), 05C and 06B (ex G), 10A to 12A (ex H), 18B (ex AD), and plan ex Z. The landscape concept plan of Mr W Ashton dated 1 November 2003 is ex F.

    4 . The amended statement of issues is dated 8 October 2003. The main issues related to the size of the proposed lots and character of the locality, the steepness and stability of the land, adequacy of access, visual impact, threatened species and bushfire protection.

    5 . Written or oral evidence for the applicants was given by: Ms K Formston, who is one of the applicants and a chartered architect; Mr M Green, surveyor; Mr D Fish, town planner, horticulturist and landscape designer; Mr W Ashton,…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Formston v Pittwater Council and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2004] NSWLEC 50
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicants, Katie Formston, Helen Kaminski, John MacRae and Pat MacRae, sought consent for an amended development application to subdivide a steep parcel of land at Nos 29, 31 and 33 Bakers Road, Church Point. The proposed subdivision would consist of four lots, with a new house to be erected on lot 4 (to be known as No 29A), and the provision of three double garages and a visitor carparking space in a carparking court towards the lower level of the subject land. The development would also include the construction of a long inclinator and a stairway to give pedestrian access from the carparking court to three of the proposed lots on the higher part of the subject land. The Land and Environment Court was required to decide whether to grant consent for the proposed development. The Court considered various legal issues, including the size of the proposed lots, the steepness and stability of the land, adequacy of access, visual impact, threatened species and bushfire protection. The Court found that there were unresolved problems relating to vehicular access, excavation and construction, and that it was not satisfied on the balance of probability that it would be appropriate to grant consent in respect of the present application. The Court did not grant consent for the proposed development.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.