Forbes Local Environmental Plan 2013 (Amendment No 7) (2018-416) LW 3 August 2018 (NSW)

New South Wales

Forbes Local Environmental Plan 2013

(Amendment No 7)

under the

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979

The following local environmental plan is made by the local plan-making authority under the

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

PAUL BENNETT, DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AND PLANNING,

FORBES SHIRE COUNCIL

As delegate for the local plan-making authority

Forbes Local Environmental Plan 2013 (Amendment No 7) [NSW]

Forbes Local Environmental Plan 2013 (Amendment No 7)

under the

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979

1      Name of Plan

This Plan is Forbes Local Environmental Plan 2013 (Amendment No 7).

2      Commencement

This Plan commences on the day on which it is published on the NSW legislation website.

3      Land to which Plan applies

This Plan applies to land in Zone RU1 Primary Production and Zone RU4 Primary

Production Small Lots under Forbes Local Environmental Plan 2013.

4 Amendment of Forbes Local Environmental Plan 2013

Insert after clause 4.2D:

4.2E

Boundary adjustments in certain rural zones

(1)	The objective of this clause is to facilitate boundary adjustments between lots where 1 or more resultant lots do not meet the minimum lot size shown on the Lot Size Map in relation to that land but the objectives of the relevant zone can be achieved.
(2)	This clause applies to land in any of the following zones:

(a)	Zone RU1 Primary Production,
(b)	Zone RU4 Primary Production Small Lots.

(3)

Despite clause 4.1, development consent may be granted to subdivide land by way of a boundary adjustment between adjoining lots where 1 or more resultant lots do not meet the minimum lot size shown on the Lot Size Map in relation to that land if the consent authority is satisfied that:

(a)	the subdivision will not create additional lots or the opportunity for additional dwellings, and
(b)	the number of dwellings or opportunities for dwellings on each lot after the subdivision will be the same as before the subdivision, and
(c)	the potential for land use conflict will not be increased as a result of the subdivision, and
(d)	the agricultural viability of the land will not be adversely affected as a result of the subdivision.